Navigating the Sale of Your Home with an SBA Lien
Discover essential steps and strategies for selling your home with an SBA lien. Learn how to navigate legal challenges and secure lender approval effectively.
Discover the latest EIDL developments: SBA cuts staff in Fort Worth, creating delays, and no offers in compromise approved, impacting small businesses' relief efforts.

Are you wondering how the latest developments in the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program might affect you or your small business? Navigating the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) recent staff reductions and the ongoing challenges with offers in compromise can feel overwhelming. This article, tailored for clients of Protect Law Group, aims to provide clarity on these updates and explore potential strategies for moving forward.
The EIDL program was established by the SBA to provide economic relief to small businesses and non-profits experiencing revenue loss due to disasters, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Its primary goal is to help businesses maintain operations during challenging times.
The SBA administers the EIDL program, handling applications, managing accounts, and addressing borrower inquiries. The effectiveness of these processes is critical for the program’s success and the survival of many small businesses.
One of the most significant changes impacting the EIDL program is the reduction of SBA staff, particularly in Fort Worth, Texas. This decision has far-reaching implications for borrowers.
The Fort Worth EIDL servicing center was a key hub for managing inquiries and servicing loan accounts. It played a pivotal role in addressing the high demand for EIDL loans during the pandemic.
As of May 5th, the staff cuts have significantly affected EIDL loan servicing operations. Borrowers no longer have access to live phone support, and communications are now limited to emails or messages through the SBA portal, which may take up to ten business days for a response. This delay can be particularly frustrating for those in urgent situations.
Another major roadblock for borrowers is the lack of progress with offers in compromise, which allow borrowers in financial distress to settle their debts for less than what they owe. Unfortunately, approvals remain nonexistent.
While borrowers have been receiving paperwork for offers in compromise, no approvals have been reported. This highlights a disconnect between what appears to be available and what is actually achievable.
Several factors may contribute to the lack of approvals, including a focus on addressing fraud within the system and systemic inefficiencies that hinder the approval process.
Political will appears to be lacking when it comes to addressing these issues, further complicating the situation for borrowers.
Recent political discussions have prioritized addressing fraud within the EIDL program, overshadowing the struggles of honest borrowers. Many businesses are suffering from genuine financial distress, not fraudulent activities.
Policymakers need to balance the focus on fraud with tangible support for struggling borrowers. Approving offers in compromise or providing alternative relief options should be prioritized.
In light of these challenges, borrowers must adopt practical strategies to navigate this complex landscape. Protect Law Group offers the following advice:
Since direct phone support is no longer available, document all communications with the SBA via email or the portal. Keeping a clear record of correspondences can be useful in case of disputes or clarifications.
Know your financial standing and obligations to the SBA. This understanding is crucial if you consider negotiating offers in compromise.
Monitor updates related to EIDL, especially regarding changes in policies or relief options. Staying informed will help you make better decisions and seize new opportunities as they arise.
The recent EIDL updates present a challenging scenario for small business owners. With the SBA cutting staff in Fort Worth and no offers in compromise being approved, navigating the economic recovery journey requires strategic approaches and constant adaptation.
Being informed is crucial. By understanding the current state of affairs and staying engaged with developments, you can better position your business for future success.
If you’re feeling overwhelmed, consider consulting with Protect Law Group. Their experienced SBA attorneys and Federal Agency Practitioners specialize in providing tailored solutions for SBA loan issues. Contact them at (833) 428-0937 for a case evaluation and personalized advice.
Ultimately, navigating the uncertainties of the EIDL program requires patience, proactive communication, and strategic planning. Protect Law Group is here to help you secure solutions for your business.
Are you struggling to navigate the recent changes in the EIDL program, including the SBA's staff cuts in Fort Worth and the lack of approved offers in compromise? Protect Law Group specializes in providing expert guidance for individuals and businesses dealing with SBA loan issues. Our experienced team of SBA Attorneys and Federal Agency Practitioners is ready to help you understand your options and develop actionable solutions tailored to your unique situation. Don't face these challenges alone—contact us today for a case evaluation at (833) 428-0937 and take the first step toward resolving your SBA loan concerns.
The EIDL (Economic Injury Disaster Loan) program is designed by the Small Business Administration (SBA) to provide economic relief to small businesses and non-profit organizations experiencing temporary revenue loss due to disasters, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Its goal is to help businesses maintain operations during challenging times.
The reduction of SBA staff in Fort Worth, Texas, has significantly impacted EIDL loan servicing. The removal of live phone support means borrowers can no longer access immediate assistance for their queries. Communications are now limited to emails or messages through the SBA portal, which can take up to ten business days for a response, causing delays and frustration for borrowers.
Offers in compromise allow borrowers in financial distress to settle their debts for less than the owed amount. However, despite borrowers receiving paperwork for these offers, no approvals have been reported. This lack of progress may be due to a focus on addressing fraud, systemic inefficiencies, and policy limitations within the SBA.
Recent political discussions have prioritized addressing fraud within the EIDL program, overshadowing the financial struggles of honest borrowers. This focus has delayed tangible support for businesses genuinely in distress, leaving them with fewer options for relief.
Borrowers should communicate proactively by documenting all interactions with the SBA via email or the portal. They should also understand their financial position and obligations to the SBA, stay informed about policy updates, and consider consulting with experts specializing in SBA loan issues for personalized advice.
Policymakers need to balance their focus on fraud prevention with providing tangible support for struggling borrowers. Approving offers in compromise, addressing systemic inefficiencies, and introducing alternative relief options are essential steps to help businesses recover and thrive.

Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000. He and his wife signed personal guarantees and pledged their home as collateral. The SBA loan went into default, the term or maturity date was accelerated and demand for payment of the entire amount claimed was made. The SBA lender’s note gave it the right to adjust the default interest rate from 7.25% to 18% per annum. The business filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy but was dismissed after 3 years due to its inability to continue with payments under the plan. Clients wanted to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which would have been a mistake as their home had significant equity to repay the SBA loan balance in full as the Trustee would likely seize and sell the home to repay the secured and unsecured creditors. However, the SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection to the SBA. Clients then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and hired the Firm to respond to it and negotiate on their behalf. Clients disputed the SBA’s alleged balance of $148,000, as several payments made to the SBA lender during the Chapter 11 reorganization were not accounted for. To challenge the SBA’s claimed debt balance, the Firm Attorneys initiated expedited discovery to obtain government records. SBA records disclosed the true amount owed was about $97,000. Moreover, because the Clients’ home had significant equity, they were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise or an immediate Release of Lien for Consideration, despite being incorrectly advised by non-attorney consulting companies that they were. Instead, our Firm Attorneys recommended a Workout of $97,000 spread over a lengthy term and a waiver of the applicable interest rate making the monthly payment affordable. After back and forth negotiations, SBA approved the Workout proposal, thereby saving the home from imminent foreclosure and reducing the Clients' liability by nearly $81,000 in incorrect principal balance, accrued interest, and statutory collection fees.

Our firm successfully resolved an SBA COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) in the original amount of $150,000 for a Florida-based borrower. The loan, issued on June 4, 2020, was secured by business assets and potential personal liability through the SBA's Security Agreement.
Following the permanent closure of the business, we guided the client through the SBA’s Business Closure Review process and prepared a comprehensive collateral analysis. We negotiated directly with the SBA, obtaining a full release of the business collateral for $2,910 — satisfying the borrower’s obligations under the Security Agreement and eliminating any further enforcement risk against the pledged assets.

Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $324,000 to buy a small business and its facility. The business and real estate had an appraisal value of $318,000 at the time of purchase. The business ultimately failed but the participating lender abandoned the business equipment and real estate collateral even though it had valid security liens. As a result, the lender recouped nearly nothing from the pledged collateral, leaving the business owners liable for the deficiency balance. The SBA paid the lender the 7(a) guaranty money and was assigned ownership of the debt, including the right to collect. However, the clients never received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and were denied the opportunity to negotiate an Offer in Compromise (OIC) or a Workout directly with the SBA before being transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service, which added an additional $80,000 in collection fees. Treasury garnished and offset the clients' wages, federal salary and social security benefits. When the clients tried to negotiate with Treasury by themselves, they were offered an unaffordable repayment plan which would have caused severe financial hardship. Clients subsequently hired the Firm to litigate an Appeals Petition before the SBA Office & Hearings Appeals (OHA) challenging the legal enforceability and amount of the debt. The Firm successfully negotiated a term OIC that was approved by the SBA Office of General Counsel, saving the clients approximately $205,000.