Navigating SBA Offer in Compromise: A Step-by-Step Guide
Dealing with SBA Bankruptcy? A SBA offer in compromise may help get you out of this difficult situation. Protect Law Group is here to help. Find out more today!
Contact Our SBA Attorneys for Nationwide Representation of SBA and Treasury Debt Problems
Book a Consultation CallPursuant to 31 U.S.C. §§ 3711(g)(1)(B), 3711(g)(4), and 3711(g)(5), and the authority delegated to the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Fiscal Service (BFS) by the U.S. Department of Justice, BFS is authorized to take appropriate action to collect or compromise transferred debts.
With regard to debts that have been transferred to BFS for debt collection services, BFS has the same authority available to the head of the federal creditor agency to compromise transferred debts or collect transferred debts in installments.
In addition, the Department of Justice has delegated to BFS the authority to compromise debts with a principal balance of up to $500,000. BFS may accept proposed compromises of debts with a principal balance of over $500,000 only with the approval of the Department of Justice.
BFS may collect and/or compromise debts in accordance with applicable Federal law, including the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR Parts 900-904). Prior to transferring debts, the federal creditor agency must provide to BFS a detailed description of any agency or debt-specific laws, policies, and procedures that govern the compromise and/or collection of its debts. Therefore, any federal creditor agency debts, including SBA debts, that have been transferred to BFS, are eligible for compromise by the Treasury’s BFS, in accordance with applicable federal law and supporting regulations.
A BFS offer in compromise (OIC) is a written settlement agreement with the BFS for less than the full amount owed. Generally, it is based on the argument that you do not have the financial ability to pay back the federal creditor agency debt (along with the administrative fees) in full within a reasonable amount of time.
The BFS are required to use the same formula that the original federal creditor agency (such as the SBA) to determine an acceptable settlement amount. A cash offer in compromise can be made. Short term and longer term deferred repayment plans are also available if you are unable to pay the settlement amount in full.
You may qualify for an OIC and not know it. Treasury’s BFS employees generally will not tell you that you qualify or that a compromise offer proposal is even available for consideration. Or, a seemingly friendly BFS official may offer to “help” you prepare and process your own OIC only to discover the whereabouts of your remaining personal assets. Then, the BFS will use its own formula against you, reject your OIC and demand payment in full or simply seize your recently discovered assets through various collection tools, such as Administrative Wage Garnishment, Treasury Offset Program levy, or referral to the Department of Justice or Private Litigation Counsel for collection litigation in federal or state court.
Thus, it is important to find out if a BFS OIC is even an option as this may be the only vehicle that can possibly save you a lot of money. If you qualify, we prepare your OIC and aggressively advocate your interests with the BFS until a final decision is reached.
Contact us today for a Case Evaluation.
Client's small business obtained an SBA COVID EIDL for $301,000 pledging collateral by executing the Note, Unconditional Guarantee and Security Agreement. The business defaulted on the loan and the SBA CESC called the Note and Guarantee, accelerated the principal balance due, accrued interest and retracted the 30-year term schedule.
The loan was transferred to the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service which resulted in the statutory addition of $90,000+ in administrative fees, costs, penalties and interest with the total debt now at $391.000+. Treasury also initiated a Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against the client's federal contractor payments for the full amount each month - intercepting all of its revenue and pushing the business to the brink of bankruptcy.
The Firm was hired to investigate and find an alternate solution to the bankruptcy option. After submitting formal production requests for all government records, it was discovered that the SBA failed to send the required Official 60-Day Pre-Referral Notice to the borrower and guarantor prior to referring the debt to Treasury. This procedural due process violation served as the basis to submit a Cross-Servicing Dispute to recall the debt from Treasury back to the SBA and to negotiate a reinstatement of the original 30-year maturity date, a modified workout, cessation of the TOP levy against the federal contractor payments and removal of the $90,000+ Treasury-based collection fees, interest and penalties.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000. He and his wife signed personal guarantees and pledged their home as collateral. The SBA loan went into default, the term or maturity date was accelerated and demand for payment of the entire amount claimed was made. The SBA lender’s note gave it the right to adjust the default interest rate from 7.25% to 18% per annum. The business filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy but was dismissed after 3 years due to its inability to continue with payments under the plan. Clients wanted to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which would have been a mistake as their home had significant equity to repay the SBA loan balance in full as the Trustee would likely seize and sell the home to repay the secured and unsecured creditors. However, the SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection to the SBA. Clients then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and hired the Firm to respond to it and negotiate on their behalf. Clients disputed the SBA’s alleged balance of $148,000, as several payments made to the SBA lender during the Chapter 11 reorganization were not accounted for. To challenge the SBA’s claimed debt balance, the Firm Attorneys initiated expedited discovery to obtain government records. SBA records disclosed the true amount owed was about $97,000. Moreover, because the Clients’ home had significant equity, they were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise or an immediate Release of Lien for Consideration, despite being incorrectly advised by non-attorney consulting companies that they were. Instead, our Firm Attorneys recommended a Workout of $97,000 spread over a lengthy term and a waiver of the applicable interest rate making the monthly payment affordable. After back and forth negotiations, SBA approved the Workout proposal, thereby saving the home from imminent foreclosure and reducing the Clients' liability by nearly $81,000 in incorrect principal balance, accrued interest, and statutory collection fees.
Our firm successfully facilitated the SBA settlement of a COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) where borrower received an SBA disaster loan of $150,000, but due to the severe economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the business was unable to recover.
Despite the borrower’s efforts to maintain operations, shutdowns and restrictions significantly reduced the customer base and revenue, making continued operations unsustainable. After a thorough business closure review, we negotiated with the SBA, securing a resolution where the borrower paid only $6,015 to release the collateral, with no further financial liability for the owner/officer.
This case demonstrates how businesses affected by the pandemic can navigate SBA loan settlements effectively. If your business is struggling with an SBA EIDL loan, we specialize in SBA Offer in Compromise (SBA OIC) solutions to help close outstanding debts while minimizing financial burden.
.jpg)
