Eligibility for Relief in the Complete COVID Collections Act: A Legal Perspective
Discover who qualifies for relief under the Complete COVID Collections Act. Explore eligibility, legal insights, and navigate requirements for small businesses today.
Discover how to mitigate SBA loan defaults using CARES Act provisions. Learn about deferral, forgiveness options, and legal strategies for financial resilience.

Have you ever found yourself grappling with the complexities of an SBA loan while concerns about defaults keep you awake at night? Navigating the labyrinth of legal and financial intricacies around Small Business Administration (SBA) loans can be daunting, especially in the face of potential defaults. Given the profound impact that such defaults may have on your business and personal financial stability, it’s crucial to be well-informed about the available avenues for resolution and the protective measures in place under specific legislative provisions such as the CARES Act.
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, passed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, includes several provisions aimed at aiding small businesses overwhelmed by financial challenges. Though primarily designed to provide relief in uncertain times, certain CARES Act provisions can directly benefit businesses facing difficulties with SBA Loan Defaults.
Under the CARES Act, mechanisms were introduced that might ease the pressures associated with loan repayment and provide opportunities for restructuring your financial obligations. These include deferments and forgiveness programs, crucial if you are facing operational challenges or significant reductions in revenue.
By leveraging these provisions, borrowers have the opportunity to renegotiate the terms of their loans or even resolve certain debts for less than what is owed. Taking advantage of such modifications requires a thorough understanding of your eligibility and the application processes involved.
Understanding your legal rights and options can mean the difference between overcoming financial obstacles and succumbing to them. At this juncture, consulting with legal experts familiar with both SBA regulations and CARES Act provisions becomes essential.
Protect Law Group focuses specifically on representing business owners in SBA and treasury debt challenges, offering robust support mechanisms to manage and resolve financial distress related to SBA loan defaults. Their legal expertise is critical in:
A strategic approach to handling SBA loan defaults under the CARES Act may involve settlement negotiations or structured repayment plans. With this in mind, Protect Law Group extends various services designed to facilitate these objectives.
For those unable to meet their SBA obligations, an Offer in Compromise presents a viable route to negotiate debt reduction. This allows eligible businesses to settle their loans for a fraction of the owed amount, provided they can substantiate their inability to pay the full sum.
A structured workout plan acts as a second lifeline, altering the repayment framework to better align with your current financial capacity.
When debts are transferred to the Treasury’s Bureau of Fiscal Service, challenges might escalate, necessitating legal intervention.
To combat administrative offsets or cross-servicing actions by the Treasury, filing a Petition for Dispute Resolution with competent authorities is imperative. This ensures debt reviews adhere to procedural fair-play, preventing unwarranted asset seizures or income penalties.
Selecting the right legal representation can significantly affect the outcome of your debt resolution process. Protect Law Group’s credentials include:
Choosing a firm like Protect Law Group means being supported by seasoned negotiators skilled in dealing with SBA intricacies, yielding peace of mind amid the financial turbulence associated with loan defaults.
The CARES Act stands as a pivotal element in providing relief options for SBA loan defaults. However, capitalizing on its benefits requires astute navigation bolstered by legal expertise. Protect Law Group equips businesses with the necessary legal strategies to manage and potentially dissolve financial liabilities stemming from SBA loans, fostering an environment for rebuilding with minimal setbacks.
By understanding the options before you and actively seeking expert guidance, you can take decisive steps towards regaining financial stability, securing your enterprise’s future, and ensuring that fear of defaults no longer necessitates sleepless nights.

Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.

Small business sole proprietor obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $500,000. Client defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for aggressive collection. Treasury added $180,000 in collection fees totaling $680,000+. Client tried to negotiate with Treasury but was only offered a 3-year or 10-year repayment plan. Client hired the Firm to represent before the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery and reviewing them, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury citing a host of purported violations. The Firm was able to negotiate a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, participation in the Hardship Accommodation Plan, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.

Clients personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan balance of $65,000 for their Texas-based business. The SBA loan was paid down to $41,000 before the business failed. The loan was referred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service. Treasury assessed its collection fees increasing the debt to $66,000. The client received a Notice of Intent to Initiate Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG) Proceedings. The Firm represented the client at the hearing and successfully challenged the legal enforceability of the debt. Based on our legal arguments, the Hearing Officer issued a Decision and Order terminating collection of the $66,000 debt by operation of law.