Your Best Path to SBA Debt Relief: OIC vs. Negotiated Workout

When facing the default of an SBA loan, business owners often feel a profound sense of pressure and uncertainty. Understanding your options is the first step toward reclaiming financial stability and securing lasting business debt relief. For many, the path forward involves either an SBA Offer in Compromise (OIC) or a structured loan workout. As experienced SBA loan attorney professionals, we help you carefully evaluate your situation to choose the strategy that offers the best outcome for your specific SBA debt challenge.

Schedule a Consultation

When facing the default of an SBA loan, business owners often feel a profound sense of pressure and uncertainty. Understanding your options is the first step toward reclaiming financial stability and securing lasting business debt relief. For many, the path forward involves either an SBA Offer in Compromise (OIC) or a structured loan workout. As experienced SBA loan attorney professionals, we help you carefully evaluate your situation to choose the strategy that offers the best outcome for your specific SBA debt challenge.

What is an SBA Offer in Compromise (OIC)?

An OIC is a formal settlement proposal where we ask the SBA to accept a reduced, lump-sum payment to satisfy the full debt. We typically use this option when the business has closed and the personal guarantor lacks the financial ability to repay the full amount. Our firm thoroughly prepares the complex financial package required to demonstrate a genuine inability to pay and maximize the potential debt reduction.

The Power of a Structured SBA Loan Workout

A negotiated loan workout is designed to make the existing SBA debt manageable for an ongoing business. This involves modifying the loan's terms, such as extending the maturity date, lowering the interest rate, or temporarily deferring payments. We often pursue this option for viable businesses that simply need breathing room due to temporary hardship. This preserves the business while providing crucial business debt relief.

The Attorney’s Role in Protecting Personal Guarantees

Nearly all SBA loans require a personal guarantee, making the debt a personal financial risk after a default. Our primary role as your SBA loan attorney is to minimize this personal liability, whether through an OIC or a workout. We provide comprehensive protection by defending against aggressive collection actions, including Treasury offsets, ensuring your family’s assets are safeguarded while resolving your SBA debt.

Choosing the Right Strategy for Your Financial Future

Selecting between an OIC and a workout is a case-by-case decision requiring deep knowledge of SBA regulations. An OIC may offer the highest percentage of business debt relief but requires a stringent financial disclosure and business closure. A workout focuses on business continuity. Our expertise lies in analyzing your unique circumstances to determine the most effective and aggressive legal path forward.

‍

If you are struggling with overwhelming SBA debt and need expert guidance, the time to act is now. At Protect Law Group, we have a proven track record of securing favorable outcomes for business owners nationwide. We specialize in navigating the complexities of the SBA and Treasury collection processes to achieve the debt resolution you deserve. Contact us today for a consultation to explore how our SBA loan attorney team can bring you peace of mind and genuine financial freedom.

‍

Frequently Asked Questions

Your Best Path to SBA Debt Relief: OIC vs. Negotiated Workout

No items found.

$350,000 SBA 7A LOAN - NEGOTIATED STRUCTURED WORKOUT AGREEMENT

Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan for $350,000. The small business failed but because of the personal guarantee liability, the client continued to pay the monthly principal & interest out-of-pocket draining his savings. The client hired a local attorney but quickly realized that he was not familiar with SBA-backed loans or their standard operating procedures. Our firm was subsequently hired after the client received the SBA's official 60-day notice. After back-and-forth negotiations, we were able to convince the SBA to reinstate the loan, retract the acceleration of the outstanding balance, modify the original terms, and approve a structured workout reducing the interest rate from 7.75% to 0% and extending the maturity date for a longer period to make the monthly payments affordable. In conclusion, not only we were able to help the client avoid litigation and bankruptcy, but our SBA lawyers also saved him approximately $227,945 over the term of the workout.

$750,000 SBA 7A LOAN – NEGOTIATED WORKOUT AGREEMENT

Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.

$1,500,000 SBA COVID-EIDL LOAN - SBA OHA LITIGATION

Small business and guarantors obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $1,000,000. Clients defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for collection. Treasury added nearly $500,000 in collection fees totaling $1,500,000. Clients were served with the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice and exercised the Repayment option by applying for the SBA’s Hardship Accommodation Plan. However, their application was summarily rejected by the SBA without providing any meaningful reasons. Clients hired the Firm to represent them against the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury. During litigation and before the OHA court issued a final Decision and Order, the Firm successfully negotiated a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, a modification of the original repayment terms, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.