SBA Loan Default - Recoverable Fees
We help people who need to avoid an SBA loan default by advising them about the SBA offer in compromise and other SBA loan problems and their solutions.
The Biden administration has made it clear that it will take action against scammers who have stolen billions in COVID relief funds. The administration directed federal agencies to step up their efforts to investigate and prosecute fraud.
Book a Consultation CallThe Biden administration has made it clear that it will take action against scammers who have stolen billions in COVID relief funds. The administration has directed federal agencies to step up their efforts to investigate and prosecute fraud related to pandemic relief programs.
The relief programs were established to provide financial support to individuals and businesses impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, scammers have taken advantage of these programs and have stolen billions of dollars.
The Biden administration has taken several steps to combat this fraud. It has created a COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force to coordinate investigations and prosecutions across multiple agencies. The task force is also working to increase public awareness of COVID-19 fraud and how to report it.
In addition, the administration has directed federal agencies to take a more proactive approach to preventing fraud. This includes improving fraud detection systems and sharing data across agencies to identify fraudulent activity.
The Biden administration has also made it clear that it will hold those who engage in COVID-19 fraud accountable. The Department of Justice has already brought several cases against individuals and companies that have defrauded the relief programs.
There have been various estimates of the amount of fraud that has occurred in COVID-19 relief programs. According to a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released in November 2020, the federal government had distributed more than $2.6 trillion in pandemic relief funds as of September 2020, and the GAO estimated that improper payments, including fraud, could range from $2 billion to $4 billion.
However, more recent estimates suggest that the amount of fraud could be higher. According to a report from the Office of the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery (SIGPR) released in January 2021, there were "significant levels of fraud" in the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program, with estimated losses of $4.6 billion to $5.4 billion. More recent estimates put the number at $60 billion.
In February 2021, the Department of Justice announced that it had charged more than 150 individuals with COVID-19 related fraud, including schemes related to PPP and EIDL. The DOJ also announced that it had recovered more than $580 million in COVID-19 related fraud cases.
So while it's difficult to estimate the exact amount of fraud that has occurred in COVID-19 relief programs, it's clear that it has been a significant problem.
If you have a EIDL loan issue of more that $30,000, contact our law firm to reserve a consultation time.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Our firm successfully negotiated an SBA offer in compromise (SBA OIC), settling a $974,535.93 SBA loan balance for just $18,000. The offerors, personal guarantors on an SBA 7(a) loan, originally obtained financing to purchase a commercial building in Lancaster, California.
The borrower filed for bankruptcy, and the third-party lender (TPL) foreclosed on the property. Despite the loan default, the SBA pursued the offerors for repayment. Given their limited income, lack of significant assets, and approaching retirement, we presented a strong case demonstrating their financial hardship.
Through strategic negotiations, we secured a favorable SBA settlement, reducing the nearly $1 million debt to a fraction of the amount owed. This outcome allowed the offerors to resolve their liability without prolonged financial strain.
Client received the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice for a loan that was obtained by her small business in 2001. The SBA loan went into default in 2004 but after hearing nothing from the SBA lender or the SBA for 20 years, out of the blue, she received the SBA's collection due process notice which provided her with only one of four options: (1) repay the entire accelerated balance immediately; (2) negotiate a repayment arrangement; (3) challenge the legal enforceability of the debt with evidence; or (4) request an OHA hearing before a U.S. Administrative Law Judge.
Client hired the Firm to represent her with only 13 days left before the expiration deadline to respond to the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice. The Firm attorneys immediately researched the SBA's Official loan database to obtain information regarding the 7(a) loan. Thereafter, the Firm attorneys conducted legal research and asserted certain affirmative defenses challenging the legal enforceability of the debt. A written response was timely filed to the 60-Day Notice with the SBA subsequently agreeing with the client's affirmative defenses and legal arguments. As a result, the SBA rendered a decision immediately terminating collection of the debt against the client's alleged personal guarantee liability saving her $50,000.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000. He and his wife signed personal guarantees and pledged their home as collateral. The SBA loan went into default, the term or maturity date was accelerated and demand for payment of the entire amount claimed was made. The SBA lender’s note gave it the right to adjust the default interest rate from 7.25% to 18% per annum. The business filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy but was dismissed after 3 years due to its inability to continue with payments under the plan. Clients wanted to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which would have been a mistake as their home had significant equity to repay the SBA loan balance in full as the Trustee would likely seize and sell the home to repay the secured and unsecured creditors. However, the SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection to the SBA. Clients then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and hired the Firm to respond to it and negotiate on their behalf. Clients disputed the SBA’s alleged balance of $148,000, as several payments made to the SBA lender during the Chapter 11 reorganization were not accounted for. To challenge the SBA’s claimed debt balance, the Firm Attorneys initiated expedited discovery to obtain government records. SBA records disclosed the true amount owed was about $97,000. Moreover, because the Clients’ home had significant equity, they were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise or an immediate Release of Lien for Consideration, despite being incorrectly advised by non-attorney consulting companies that they were. Instead, our Firm Attorneys recommended a Workout of $97,000 spread over a lengthy term and a waiver of the applicable interest rate making the monthly payment affordable. After back and forth negotiations, SBA approved the Workout proposal, thereby saving the home from imminent foreclosure and reducing the Clients' liability by nearly $81,000 in incorrect principal balance, accrued interest, and statutory collection fees.
.jpg)
