SBA Loan Default: Termination of Collection Action
Dealing with an SBA OIC case can be hard. You should allow one of our lawyers to settle SBA debt for you. Talk to us about your SBA loan default.
Do you want to know more about how to stop an administrative wage garnishment but don't know where to start? Learn more here.
Book a Consultation CallThe impact of the pandemic has not been limited to our mental and physical health, but also our financial wellbeing. According to this CNBC news report, the average American now has an individual debt of about $92,727. It is safe to say that there are a significant number of creditors out there awaiting payments that are long overdue.
This could have various implications on individuals as well as businesses alike. In circumstances like these, it is not uncommon, but often surprising to receive an administrative wage garnishment if you have defaulted on an SBA loan.
This article explores the nature of these legal procedures and what you, as a debtor, small business, or employer can do to challenge these wage garnishments.
Let's get started by examining the definition of this procedure, first.
Administrative wage garnishment is a legal procedure. Here, a percentage of an individual's earnings is withheld and used to clear debts owed to the federal government.
Unlike wage garnishments issued for a private creditor, the federal government does not have to file suit and obtain a judgement before initiating an administrative wage garnishment.
For example, if you are in default of your and are employed, you may receive an administrative wage garnishment.
You can stop or challenge an administrative wage garnishment when:
There is an exemption for those who have been employed for less than twelve months after losing their previous job. Further, you also get a notice of the administrative wage garnishment and the opportunity for a hearing before the garnishment order can issue.
You can request a hearing to challenge the order on or before the end of this notice period to avoid wage garnishment. However, if you challenge the order after this time period the employer may continue to withhold the amount specified from your wages until a decision has been made.
You can find yourself in one of two situations:
In the first instance, you must provide evidence that demonstrates why you do not owe a debt to the creditor. Depending on your circumstances, you may have already cleared this debt, you may have been released from debt or it could be an administrative error.
In the second instance, you may have to establish that you've already cleared part of the amount. Alternatively, part of your collateral may have been sold to reduce the amount owed. Whatever your reasons are, make sure to provide records, receipts, and other evidence to prove that there has been an error on the part of the issuing authorities.
You may also challenge an administrative wage garnishment if it would be a cause of financial hardship to you. To prove this you need to submit a personal financial statement to support your claim.
In a nutshell, you must be able to demonstrate that if your employer were to follow through on the wage garnishment, you would not be able to meet your basic needs. This could include food, utilities, housing, transportation for work, medical care, and other essentials relevant to your daily needs.
Do keep in mind that you cannot use private school tuition or housing cost in excess of the average rent as a daily expense.
An administrative wage garnishment causes you and your business financial hardships and come at unfortunate moments. However, there is plenty you can do to stay afloat and challenge these orders.
Are you a business owner struggling to pay off a federal loan that exceeds $30,000? Do you have trouble managing an administrative wage garnishment? Our team of qualified SBA attorneys can help.
We provide legal assistance and representation to personal guarantors, federal debtors, and small business owners across the nation. Contact us to get helpful information and expert advice on your next course of action. Get in touch today.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for their small business in the amount of $298,000. They pledged their primary residence and personal guarantees as direct collateral for the loan. The business failed, the lender was paid the 7(a) guaranty money and the debt was assigned to the SBA. Clients received the Official 60-Day Notice giving them a couple of options to resolve the debt balance directly with the SBA before referral to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service. The risk of referral to Treasury would add nearly $95,000 to the SBA principal loan balance. With the default interest rate at 7.5%, the amount of money to pay toward interest was projected at $198,600. Clients hired the Firm with only 4 days left to respond to the 60-Day due process notice. Because the clients were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) due to the significant equity in their home and the SBA lien encumbering it, the Firm Attorneys proposed a Structured Workout to resolve the SBA debt. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist assigned to the case approved the Workout terms which prevented potential foreclosure of their home, but also saved the clients approximately $294,000 over the agreed-upon Workout term with a waiver of all contractual and statutory administrative fees, collection costs, penalties, and interest.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000. He and his wife signed personal guarantees and pledged their home as collateral. The SBA loan went into default, the term or maturity date was accelerated and demand for payment of the entire amount claimed was made. The SBA lender’s note gave it the right to adjust the default interest rate from 7.25% to 18% per annum. The business filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy but was dismissed after 3 years due to its inability to continue with payments under the plan. Clients wanted to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which would have been a mistake as their home had significant equity to repay the SBA loan balance in full as the Trustee would likely seize and sell the home to repay the secured and unsecured creditors. However, the SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection to the SBA. Clients then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and hired the Firm to respond to it and negotiate on their behalf. Clients disputed the SBA’s alleged balance of $148,000, as several payments made to the SBA lender during the Chapter 11 reorganization were not accounted for. To challenge the SBA’s claimed debt balance, the Firm Attorneys initiated expedited discovery to obtain government records. SBA records disclosed the true amount owed was about $97,000. Moreover, because the Clients’ home had significant equity, they were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise or an immediate Release of Lien for Consideration, despite being incorrectly advised by non-attorney consulting companies that they were. Instead, our Firm Attorneys recommended a Workout of $97,000 spread over a lengthy term and a waiver of the applicable interest rate making the monthly payment affordable. After back and forth negotiations, SBA approved the Workout proposal, thereby saving the home from imminent foreclosure and reducing the Clients' liability by nearly $81,000 in incorrect principal balance, accrued interest, and statutory collection fees.
Client's small business obtained an SBA COVID EIDL for $301,000 pledging collateral by executing the Note, Unconditional Guarantee and Security Agreement. The business defaulted on the loan and the SBA CESC called the Note and Guarantee, accelerated the principal balance due, accrued interest and retracted the 30-year term schedule.
The loan was transferred to the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service which resulted in the statutory addition of $90,000+ in administrative fees, costs, penalties and interest with the total debt now at $391.000+. Treasury also initiated a Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against the client's federal contractor payments for the full amount each month - intercepting all of its revenue and pushing the business to the brink of bankruptcy.
The Firm was hired to investigate and find an alternate solution to the bankruptcy option. After submitting formal production requests for all government records, it was discovered that the SBA failed to send the required Official 60-Day Pre-Referral Notice to the borrower and guarantor prior to referring the debt to Treasury. This procedural due process violation served as the basis to submit a Cross-Servicing Dispute to recall the debt from Treasury back to the SBA and to negotiate a reinstatement of the original 30-year maturity date, a modified workout, cessation of the TOP levy against the federal contractor payments and removal of the $90,000+ Treasury-based collection fees, interest and penalties.
.jpg)
