Can My Business Submit an Offer in Compromise for a Covid EIDL Loan?
Can My Business Submit an Offer in Compromise for a Covid EIDL Loan?
The transcript of the video follows below for further review.
In fiscal year 2014, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) established the High Risk 7(a) Loan Review Program to minimize losses on Small Business Administration (SBA) guaranteed loans, help SBA improve the effectiveness and integrity of its 7(a) Program, and protect program dollars.
The OIG reviewed eight (8) early-defaulted loans and consequently identified material lender origination and closing deficiencies that justified denial of the SBA guaranty for three (3) loans totaling $3.2 million.
To facilitate SBA’s timely review and recovery of these payments, the OIG formally issued separate reports on each loan that included detailed descriptions of the identified material deficiencies. The OIG also identified suspicious activity on two (2) purchased loans totaling $1.4 million, resulting in formal referrals to the Investigations Division.
In the OIG’s judgment, change of ownership transactions continued to be an area of high risk for the SBA. Further, three out of the five loans that were either formally reported on, or referred due to potentially fraudulent activity, were included in SBA’s FY 2015 review of improper payments. SBA did not identify the improper payments on these loans. In a previous audit, the OIG determined that SBA’s limited reviews of the original lender’s underwriting guidelines resulted in improper payments.
Some of the key reviews detailed in the OIG report are highlighted below:
Change of Ownership Transactions
The OIG indicated that 8 of the 15 loans that were reviewed had financed change of ownership transactions. Additionally, 4 of these 8 loans, purchased for a total of $2.8 million, either had material lender deficiencies or indications of suspicious activity. The OIG believes that change of ownership transactions has been one of the riskiest transactions financed by SBA. Prior audits have identified the following deficiencies in change of ownership transactions:
Further, the Investigations Division has identified significant fraud in change of ownership transactions. In FY 2009, the OIG issued an information notice that recommended lenders and other program participants perform a higher level of due diligence in reviewing change of ownership transactions.
Identifying Improper Payments
While the OIG noted improvement in SBA’s 7(a) purchase review process, it remains concerned about the effectiveness of SBA’s efforts to prevent improper payments. Specifically, four loans the OIG formally reported on or referred to the Investigations Division were included in either SBA’s FY 2014 or FY 2015 reviews for improper payments. During its improper payments reviews, SBA examines loan files to determine if lenders complied with the 7(a) Loan Program requirements.
SBA did not identify or report the improper payments totaling $4.5 million associated to these loans. Upon receiving these reports, SBA substantially concurred with the OIG findings on the loans and confirmed them as improper payments.
A complete copy of the OIG’s Report to Congress can be found here: The OIG High Risk SBA 7(a) Loan Review Report
If you are facing an SBA loan default, contact us today for a consultation with an experienced SBA workout attorney at 888-756-9969
We analyze your SBA loan problems and advise you on potential solutions such as an SBA offer in compromise for your SBA loan default.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.

Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan to help with a relative’s new business venture. After the business failed, Treasury was able to secure a recurring Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against his monthly Social Security Benefits based on the claim that he owed over $1.2 million dollars. We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute, but then, prepared and filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals (SBA OHA). As a result of our efforts, we were able to convince the SBA to not only terminate the claimed debt of $1.2 million dollars against our client (without him having to file bankruptcy) but also refund the past recurring amounts that were offset from his Social Security Benefits in connection with the TOP levy.

Our firm successfully resolved an SBA 7a loan in the original amount of $364,000 for a New Jersey-based borrower. The client filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy but the mortgage on his real estate securing the loan remained in place. The available equity amounted to $263,470 and the deficiency equaled $317,886.
We gathered the pertinent documentation and prepared a comprehensive collateral analysis. We negotiated directly with the SBA, obtaining a full release of the mortgage for $80,000.

Client received the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice for a loan that was obtained by her small business in 2001. The SBA loan went into default in 2004 but after hearing nothing from the SBA lender or the SBA for 20 years, out of the blue, she received the SBA's collection due process notice which provided her with only one of four options: (1) repay the entire accelerated balance immediately; (2) negotiate a repayment arrangement; (3) challenge the legal enforceability of the debt with evidence; or (4) request an OHA hearing before a U.S. Administrative Law Judge.
Client hired the Firm to represent her with only 13 days left before the expiration deadline to respond to the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice. The Firm attorneys immediately researched the SBA's Official loan database to obtain information regarding the 7(a) loan. Thereafter, the Firm attorneys conducted legal research and asserted certain affirmative defenses challenging the legal enforceability of the debt. A written response was timely filed to the 60-Day Notice with the SBA subsequently agreeing with the client's affirmative defenses and legal arguments. As a result, the SBA rendered a decision immediately terminating collection of the debt against the client's alleged personal guarantee liability saving her $50,000.