What Happens If a PPP Loan is Not Forgiven?
If your application for PPP loan forgiveness is denied by the SBA you have appeal rights. Learn more about how to assert your rights to an appeal.
The transcript of the video follows below for further review.
In fiscal year 2014, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) established the High Risk 7(a) Loan Review Program to minimize losses on Small Business Administration (SBA) guaranteed loans, help SBA improve the effectiveness and integrity of its 7(a) Program, and protect program dollars.
The OIG reviewed eight (8) early-defaulted loans and consequently identified material lender origination and closing deficiencies that justified denial of the SBA guaranty for three (3) loans totaling $3.2 million.
To facilitate SBA’s timely review and recovery of these payments, the OIG formally issued separate reports on each loan that included detailed descriptions of the identified material deficiencies. The OIG also identified suspicious activity on two (2) purchased loans totaling $1.4 million, resulting in formal referrals to the Investigations Division.
In the OIG’s judgment, change of ownership transactions continued to be an area of high risk for the SBA. Further, three out of the five loans that were either formally reported on, or referred due to potentially fraudulent activity, were included in SBA’s FY 2015 review of improper payments. SBA did not identify the improper payments on these loans. In a previous audit, the OIG determined that SBA’s limited reviews of the original lender’s underwriting guidelines resulted in improper payments.
Some of the key reviews detailed in the OIG report are highlighted below:
Change of Ownership Transactions
The OIG indicated that 8 of the 15 loans that were reviewed had financed change of ownership transactions. Additionally, 4 of these 8 loans, purchased for a total of $2.8 million, either had material lender deficiencies or indications of suspicious activity. The OIG believes that change of ownership transactions has been one of the riskiest transactions financed by SBA. Prior audits have identified the following deficiencies in change of ownership transactions:
Further, the Investigations Division has identified significant fraud in change of ownership transactions. In FY 2009, the OIG issued an information notice that recommended lenders and other program participants perform a higher level of due diligence in reviewing change of ownership transactions.
Identifying Improper Payments
While the OIG noted improvement in SBA’s 7(a) purchase review process, it remains concerned about the effectiveness of SBA’s efforts to prevent improper payments. Specifically, four loans the OIG formally reported on or referred to the Investigations Division were included in either SBA’s FY 2014 or FY 2015 reviews for improper payments. During its improper payments reviews, SBA examines loan files to determine if lenders complied with the 7(a) Loan Program requirements.
SBA did not identify or report the improper payments totaling $4.5 million associated to these loans. Upon receiving these reports, SBA substantially concurred with the OIG findings on the loans and confirmed them as improper payments.
A complete copy of the OIG’s Report to Congress can be found here: The OIG High Risk SBA 7(a) Loan Review Report
If you are facing an SBA loan default, contact us today for a consultation with an experienced SBA workout attorney at 888-756-9969
We analyze your SBA loan problems and advise you on potential solutions such as an SBA offer in compromise for your SBA loan default.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Clients personally guaranteed an SBA 504 loan balance of $337,000. The Third Party Lender had obtained a Judgment against the clients. We represented clients before the SBA and negotiated an SBA OIC that was accepted for $30,000.
Clients executed personal and corporate guarantees for an SBA 7(a) loan from a Preferred Lender Provider (PLP). The borrower corporation defaulted on the loan exposing all collateral pledged by the Clients. The SBA subsequently acquired the loan balance from the PLP, including the right to collect against all guarantors. The SBA sent the Official Pre-Referral Notice to the guarantors giving them sixty (60) days to either pay the outstanding balance in full, negotiate a Repayment (Offer in Compromise (OIC) or Structured Workout (SW)), challenge their alleged guarantor liability or file a Request for Hearing (Appeals Petition) with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals.
Because the Clients were not financially eligible for an OIC, they opted for Structured Workout negotiations directly with the SBA before the debt was transferred to the Bureau of Fiscal Service, a division of the U.S. Department of Treasury for enforced collection.
The Firm was hired to negotiate a global Workout Agreement directly with the SBA to resolve the personal and corporate guarantees. After submitting the Structured Workout proposal, the assigned SBA Loan Specialist approved the requested terms in under ten (10) days without any lengthy back and forth negotiations.
The favorable terms of the Workout included an extended maturity at an affordable principal amount, along with a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Clients approximately $181,000 in administrative fees, penalties and interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)) as authorized by 31 U.S.C. § 3717(e) had the SBA loan been transferred to BFS.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.
.jpg)
