You don't have to deal with your SBA debt alone. The following is a guide for an effective SBA offer in compromise strategy.
Book a Consultation CallAre you currently struggling with SBA debt? You don't have to deal with this alone. The following is a guide for an effective SBA offer in compromise strategy.
If you're facing SBA loan default, the best choice you can make is to get help. It can be hard to know what to do in this situation, but reacting quickly and effectively is critical when it comes to reaching a settlement. Failing to address the problem only leads to more problems down the road and significant additional fees and costs.
This article will go through the three main elements of an effective SBA offer in compromise strategy including the three keys to an effective SBA offer in compromise.
What is an SBA offer in compromise? An SBA offer in compromise consists of paying a portion of the SBA to have the SBA consider the debt paid and thereafter will no longer seek collection from the alleged debtor.
The general requirements for compromise of a debt owed on an SBA loan are as follows:
Demonstrate That The Full Amount Of The SBA Loan Cannot Be Recovered Within A Reasonable Amount Of Time
You must show that you don’t have the means to pay the full amount of the debt within a reasonable amount of time. Naturally, the higher the debt, the less chance there is that you could pay the full amount of the debt. Usually, for instance, a person with a $35,000 debt will have a harder time showing an inability to pay within a reasonable amount of time than a person with a $2,000,000 debt.
In either case, an experienced SBA workout attorney can help show the SBA why the debtor cannot pay within a reasonable amount of time and why a SBA offer in compromise provides a better recovery for the SBA. Certain issues an SBA attorney can address include how to determine the value of real estate for purposes of an offer in compromise. Real estate may have a certain fair market value, but that value differs from what the SBA could reasonably expect to extract. An experienced SBA attorney can address those type of issues.
Other issues such as what is your disposable income every month require experienced analysis. You may be missing monthly deductions to your monthly income that show an inability to pay within a reasonable amount of time.
Your SBA offer in compromise strategy should establish significant litigative risk, i.e., a real doubt concerning the ability to prevail in court because of legal issues or factual disputes.
Only a qualified attorney can adequately address any litigative risk issues. The process includes obtaining the SBA loan file from the SBA and performing a detailed analysis of the documents therein. Are there issues with the personal guarantees? Are the loan documents in proper order? Is the amount being sought by the SBA correct? Did the SBA or bank make any misrepresentations? Were you provided proper due process? These issues and more may present a litigative risk that if presented properly will provide you with more leverage in negotiating an SBA offer in compromise and is part of an effective SBA offer in compromise strategy.
The SBA will not agree to an offer in compromise if it believes it could recover more by referring the debt to the Department of Treasury for collection. The Department of Treasury can use several collection tactics such as administrative wage garnishment, tax refund offset, federal payment offset and litigation to collect on the debt.
Your SBA offer in compromise must demonstrate that your settlement amount is a better deal that what the SBA could hope to collect through enforced collection via referral to the Department of Treasury. This requires a detailed analysis of what the government would hope to collect through enforced collection. As such, a successful SBA offer in compromise should “do the math” regarding enforced collection. Naturally, an experienced SBA attorney is best suited to perform this analysis.
Conclusions
An attorney can help you come out of the SBA loan default process on top with an effective SBA offer in compromise strategy. Remember, hiding your head in the sand when faced with an SBA loan default will only result in more pain down the line. Once your debt is referred to the Department of Treasury, the Department of Treasury adds 28%-30% to the debt. This means, for instance, for every $100,000 the SBA alleges you owe, once the SBA refers it to the Department of Treasury an additional $28,000 - $30,000 gets tacked on to the debt.
By providing the best legal help, an SBA attorney can fight for your rights and protect you much better than you could on your own or with an inexperienced attorney or non-attorney. Protect Law Group knows the ins and outs of an effective SBA offer in compromise strategy.
Do you have more questions about your SBA offer in compromise? Set up a consultation today with an experienced SBA workout attorney.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.
Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan balance of $58,000. The client received a notice of Intent to initiate Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG) Proceedings. We represented the client at the hearing and successfully defeated the AWG Order based on several legal and equitable grounds.
Clients executed personal and corporate guarantees for an SBA 7(a) loan from a Preferred Lender Provider (PLP). The borrower corporation defaulted on the loan exposing all collateral pledged by the Clients. The SBA subsequently acquired the loan balance from the PLP, including the right to collect against all guarantors. The SBA sent the Official Pre-Referral Notice to the guarantors giving them sixty (60) days to either pay the outstanding balance in full, negotiate a Repayment (Offer in Compromise (OIC) or Structured Workout (SW)), challenge their alleged guarantor liability or file a Request for Hearing (Appeals Petition) with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals.
Because the Clients were not financially eligible for an OIC, they opted for Structured Workout negotiations directly with the SBA before the debt was transferred to the Bureau of Fiscal Service, a division of the U.S. Department of Treasury for enforced collection.
The Firm was hired to negotiate a global Workout Agreement directly with the SBA to resolve the personal and corporate guarantees. After submitting the Structured Workout proposal, the assigned SBA Loan Specialist approved the requested terms in under ten (10) days without any lengthy back and forth negotiations.
The favorable terms of the Workout included an extended maturity at an affordable principal amount, along with a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Clients approximately $181,000 in administrative fees, penalties and interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)) as authorized by 31 U.S.C. § 3717(e) had the SBA loan been transferred to BFS.
.jpg)
