Current SBA Guidelines on EIDL Loan Settlements
Struggling with a COVID EIDL loan? Learn how the SBA's Offer in Compromise works in 2025, eligibility rules, and settlement options before policies change.
Small business owners acquire commercial loans to start their companies. These opportunities allow them to gain financing to purchase a location and merchandise needed to operate the business. When the owner can no longer manage this financial obligation, they need an SBA Offer in Compromise to avoid the negative impact of a default.
Essentially, an SBA offer in compromise is a settlement offer. The small business owner submits an application with their lender to acquire approval. The lender evaluates the financial circumstances of the business owner and identifies a value that is fair and reasonable. This value is based on a percentage of the total value owed to the lender. Upon acceptance of this value, the business owner submits the payment as specified.
An SBA loan default is the primary reason for seeking an offer in compromise. Once the loan is in default, the lender has the legal right to file a claim against the identified collateral. The collateral could include the building, machinery, and any inventory that was financed through the loan. If the borrower doesn't take action, the lender could seize the collateral and generate a major financial loss for the borrower. An SBA loan foreclosure is included in the available legal actions.
The borrower must hire an attorney to communicate with their lender. When hiring an attorney, the borrower must provide the SBA demand letter. The attorney discusses a possible settlement offer with the lender. In most cases, the lender will accept a lower value in order to settle the debt. Once it enters default, the lender may acquire a portion of the funds through an insurance settlement. When this is the case, it gives the borrower leverage over their case.
Small business owners need commercial loans to open their companies. These financing opportunities are available to any party that has a lucrative business venture. However, the mismanagement of their finances could lead to a default. When this happens, foreclosure is an almost certainty. Small business owners who need a settlement offer or to participate in a Tax Offset Program should contact an attorney now.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan for $100,000 from the lender. The SBA loan went into early default in 2006 less than 12 months from disbursement. The SBA paid the 7(a) guaranty monies to the lender and subsequently acquired the deficiency balance of about $96,000, including the right to collect against the guarantor. However, the SBA sent the Official 60-Day Due Process Notice to the Client's defunct business address instead of his personal residence, which he never received. As a result, the debt was transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service where substantial collection fees were assessed, including accrued interest per the promissory note. Treasury eventually referred the debt to a Private Collection Agency (PCA) - Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. Pioneer sent a demand letter claiming a debt balance of almost $310,000 - a shocking 223% increase from the original loan amount assigned to the SBA. Client's social security disability benefits were seized through the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). Client hired the Firm to represent him as the debt continued to snowball despite seizure of his social security benefits and federal tax refunds as the involuntary payments were first applied to Treasury's collection fees, then to accrued interest with minimal allocation to the SBA principal balance.
We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute (CSD) challenging the referral of the debt to Treasury based on the defective notice sent to the defunct business address. Despite overwhelming evidence proving a violation of the Client's Due Process rights, the SBA still rejected the CSD. As a result, an Appeals Petition was filed with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) Court challenging the SBA decision and its certification the debt was legally enforceable in the amount claimed. After several months of litigation before the SBA OHA Court, our Firm Attorney successfully negotiated an Offer in Compromise (OIC) Term Workout with the SBA Supervising Trial Attorney for $82,000 spread over a term of 74 months at a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Client an estimated $241,000 in Treasury collection fees, accrued interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)), and the PCA contingency fee.
Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan balance of over $150,000. Business failed and eventually shut down. SBA then pursued client for the balance. We intervened and was able to present an SBA OIC that was accepted for $30,000.
Client received the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice for a loan that was obtained by her small business in 2001. The SBA loan went into default in 2004 but after hearing nothing from the SBA lender or the SBA for 20 years, out of the blue, she received the SBA's collection due process notice which provided her with only one of four options: (1) repay the entire accelerated balance immediately; (2) negotiate a repayment arrangement; (3) challenge the legal enforceability of the debt with evidence; or (4) request an OHA hearing before a U.S. Administrative Law Judge.
Client hired the Firm to represent her with only 13 days left before the expiration deadline to respond to the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice. The Firm attorneys immediately researched the SBA's Official loan database to obtain information regarding the 7(a) loan. Thereafter, the Firm attorneys conducted legal research and asserted certain affirmative defenses challenging the legal enforceability of the debt. A written response was timely filed to the 60-Day Notice with the SBA subsequently agreeing with the client's affirmative defenses and legal arguments. As a result, the SBA rendered a decision immediately terminating collection of the debt against the client's alleged personal guarantee liability saving her $50,000.
.jpg)
