Commentary: Why Hire An Attorney To Prepare and Negotiate Your SBA Offer in Compromise
Explore why borrowers seek counsel to prepare and negotiate an SBA offer in compromise, including personal guarantees and settlement review.
Are you unsure of whether or not you need an SBA offer in compromise? Our team is here to help advise you as to when to seek out an offer in compromise.
Book a Consultation CallCurrently, the world faces unprecedented challenges. For many, these challenges have made it difficult to stay on top of SBA loan payments. In these difficult economic times, your business may not survive. Fortunately, you have options if you fall behind. If you need SBA loan relief, you may find that you qualify for an SBA Offer in Compromise (OIC). An OIC allows you to settle your SBA loan obligation for less than the total balance.
To learn more about when to seek out an Offer in Compromise, keep reading.
Offer in Compromise
The SBA doesn’t approve all requests for a settlement. For this reason, it’s a good idea to seek professional help so that you have the best chance of the agency accepting your request.
With an Offer in Compromise, you can settle your SBA debt for less than the full amount owed.
It’s a viable option if you cannot pay your SBA debt in full. For example, paying your SBA loan guarantee might cause financial hardship.
The SBA will consider several things when deciding whether to accept your settlement. As an example, they’ll assess your ability to pay your obligation.
They’ll also evaluate your current income and expenses. Furthermore, they’ll make a review of your existing assets.
Typically, the SBA will accept an OIC claim when the amount offered is what the agency deems reasonable to collect within a certain amount of time.
However, an Offer in Compromise is not for everyone who’s behind on their SBA loan. For example, if you apply for settlement, it’s important that you’re not filing for bankruptcy
For these reasons and others, it may prove prudent to seek professional help when applying for an Offer in Compromise. However, it’s equally as important to choose an SBA professional that’s skilled and experienced.
The Offer in Compromise program is legitimate and viable. The SBA doesn’t want to wait ten years to collect payments. Still, the agency understands that some people simply cannot afford to pay their full SBA loan obligation.
For this reason, the SBA provides the Offer in Compromise program to give certain individuals and businesses a fresh start. Under the program, the SBA will accept a settlement amount. The agency will then write off the remaining debt.
However, it’s important to understand that an Offer in Compromise is not an exercise in diplomacy. When you apply for an Offer in Compromise, it’s also not an arena to test your negotiating skills.
Some people mistakenly think that they can use negotiation tactics to solicit the best offer from the SBA. For instance, they may plan to start out making a lowball offer.
Alternatively, they may portray themselves as stubborn and walk away from discussing the Offer in Compromise on one or more occasions. By deploying these tactics, they believe that they can arrange a better deal.
However, the SBA determines the viability of a request for a settlement using math and legal factors called "litigative risks". They use a formula to determine the terms of an Offer in Compromise based on your allowable expenses, assets, and income. The same formula applies to every request.
Using the formula, SBA loan specialists determine the amount deemed reasonable to collect. They will not take an amount lower than what they determine using the formula. For this reason, it’s important to work with a legal professional who can help you to apply the formula correctly as well as assert legal defenses in your favor.
An experienced SBA attorney can help you calculate the correct amount when requesting a settlement. They understand the standards used by the SBA. For example, an experienced attorney knows what expenses you can deduct and which ones you cannot.
There are some gray areas in this regard. However, even the gray areas are based on clearly outlined allowed expenses.
When searching for counsel, stay away from any advisor who promises they can secure an Offer in Compromise without reviewing your situation. Nevertheless, an Offer in Compromise is worth considering if you’ve exhausted all other options. If you have minimal assets, live modestly, and have financial trouble, an Offer in Compromise may help you .
Now you know more about the SBA Offer in Compromise program. What you need now is an attorney that can guide you through the process.
Protect Law Group specializes in representing small business owners and federal debtors across the United States. We’ve helped companies resolve millions of dollars in debt.
Find out the best option for resolving your SBA-related debt. Contact a Protect Law Group attorney today at (833) 428-0933 or connect with us online to schedule a case evaluation.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Our firm successfully resolved an SBA 7(a) loan default in the amount of $140,000 on behalf of a husband-and-wife guarantor pair. The business had closed following a prolonged decline in revenue, leaving the borrowers personally liable for the remaining balance.
After conducting a comprehensive financial analysis and preparing a detailed SBA Offer in Compromise (SBA OIC) package, we negotiated directly with the SBA and the lender to achieve a settlement for $70,000 — just 50% of the outstanding balance. This settlement released the borrowers from further personal liability and allowed them to move forward without the threat of enforced collection.
Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $324,000 to buy a small business and its facility. The business and real estate had an appraisal value of $318,000 at the time of purchase. The business ultimately failed but the participating lender abandoned the business equipment and real estate collateral even though it had valid security liens. As a result, the lender recouped nearly nothing from the pledged collateral, leaving the business owners liable for the deficiency balance. The SBA paid the lender the 7(a) guaranty money and was assigned ownership of the debt, including the right to collect. However, the clients never received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and were denied the opportunity to negotiate an Offer in Compromise (OIC) or a Workout directly with the SBA before being transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service, which added an additional $80,000 in collection fees. Treasury garnished and offset the clients' wages, federal salary and social security benefits. When the clients tried to negotiate with Treasury by themselves, they were offered an unaffordable repayment plan which would have caused severe financial hardship. Clients subsequently hired the Firm to litigate an Appeals Petition before the SBA Office & Hearings Appeals (OHA) challenging the legal enforceability and amount of the debt. The Firm successfully negotiated a term OIC that was approved by the SBA Office of General Counsel, saving the clients approximately $205,000.
Client's small business obtained an SBA COVID EIDL for $301,000 pledging collateral by executing the Note, Unconditional Guarantee and Security Agreement. The business defaulted on the loan and the SBA CESC called the Note and Guarantee, accelerated the principal balance due, accrued interest and retracted the 30-year term schedule.
The loan was transferred to the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service which resulted in the statutory addition of $90,000+ in administrative fees, costs, penalties and interest with the total debt now at $391.000+. Treasury also initiated a Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against the client's federal contractor payments for the full amount each month - intercepting all of its revenue and pushing the business to the brink of bankruptcy.
The Firm was hired to investigate and find an alternate solution to the bankruptcy option. After submitting formal production requests for all government records, it was discovered that the SBA failed to send the required Official 60-Day Pre-Referral Notice to the borrower and guarantor prior to referring the debt to Treasury. This procedural due process violation served as the basis to submit a Cross-Servicing Dispute to recall the debt from Treasury back to the SBA and to negotiate a reinstatement of the original 30-year maturity date, a modified workout, cessation of the TOP levy against the federal contractor payments and removal of the $90,000+ Treasury-based collection fees, interest and penalties.
.jpg)
