Contact Our SBA Attorneys for Nationwide Representation of SBA and Treasury Debt Problems
Book a Consultation CallPursuant to 31 U.S.C. §§ 3711(g)(1)(B), 3711(g)(4), and 3711(g)(5), and the authority delegated to the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Fiscal Service (BFS) by the U.S. Department of Justice, BFS is authorized to take appropriate action to collect or compromise transferred debts.
With regard to debts that have been transferred to BFS for debt collection services, BFS has the same authority available to the head of the federal creditor agency to compromise transferred debts or collect transferred debts in installments.
In addition, the Department of Justice has delegated to BFS the authority to compromise debts with a principal balance of up to $500,000. BFS may accept proposed compromises of debts with a principal balance of over $500,000 only with the approval of the Department of Justice.
BFS may collect and/or compromise debts in accordance with applicable Federal law, including the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR Parts 900-904). Prior to transferring debts, the federal creditor agency must provide to BFS a detailed description of any agency or debt-specific laws, policies, and procedures that govern the compromise and/or collection of its debts. Therefore, any federal creditor agency debts, including SBA debts, that have been transferred to BFS, are eligible for compromise by the Treasury’s BFS, in accordance with applicable federal law and supporting regulations.
A BFS offer in compromise (OIC) is a written settlement agreement with the BFS for less than the full amount owed. Generally, it is based on the argument that you do not have the financial ability to pay back the federal creditor agency debt (along with the administrative fees) in full within a reasonable amount of time.
The BFS are required to use the same formula that the original federal creditor agency (such as the SBA) to determine an acceptable settlement amount. A cash offer in compromise can be made. Short term and longer term deferred repayment plans are also available if you are unable to pay the settlement amount in full.
You may qualify for an OIC and not know it. Treasury’s BFS employees generally will not tell you that you qualify or that a compromise offer proposal is even available for consideration. Or, a seemingly friendly BFS official may offer to “help” you prepare and process your own OIC only to discover the whereabouts of your remaining personal assets. Then, the BFS will use its own formula against you, reject your OIC and demand payment in full or simply seize your recently discovered assets through various collection tools, such as Administrative Wage Garnishment, Treasury Offset Program levy, or referral to the Department of Justice or Private Litigation Counsel for collection litigation in federal or state court.
Thus, it is important to find out if a BFS OIC is even an option as this may be the only vehicle that can possibly save you a lot of money. If you qualify, we prepare your OIC and aggressively advocate your interests with the BFS until a final decision is reached.
Contact us today for a Case Evaluation.
Client received the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice for a loan that was obtained by her small business in 2001. The SBA loan went into default in 2004 but after hearing nothing from the SBA lender or the SBA for 20 years, out of the blue, she received the SBA's collection due process notice which provided her with only one of four options: (1) repay the entire accelerated balance immediately; (2) negotiate a repayment arrangement; (3) challenge the legal enforceability of the debt with evidence; or (4) request an OHA hearing before a U.S. Administrative Law Judge.
Client hired the Firm to represent her with only 13 days left before the expiration deadline to respond to the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice. The Firm attorneys immediately researched the SBA's Official loan database to obtain information regarding the 7(a) loan. Thereafter, the Firm attorneys conducted legal research and asserted certain affirmative defenses challenging the legal enforceability of the debt. A written response was timely filed to the 60-Day Notice with the SBA subsequently agreeing with the client's affirmative defenses and legal arguments. As a result, the SBA rendered a decision immediately terminating collection of the debt against the client's alleged personal guarantee liability saving her $50,000.
Our firm successfully resolved an SBA 7(a) loan default in the amount of $140,000 on behalf of a husband-and-wife guarantor pair. The business had closed following a prolonged decline in revenue, leaving the borrowers personally liable for the remaining balance.
After conducting a comprehensive financial analysis and preparing a detailed SBA Offer in Compromise (SBA OIC) package, we negotiated directly with the SBA and the lender to achieve a settlement for $70,000 — just 50% of the outstanding balance. This settlement released the borrowers from further personal liability and allowed them to move forward without the threat of enforced collection.
Our firm successfully negotiated an SBA offer in compromise (SBA OIC), settling a $974,535.93 SBA loan balance for just $18,000. The offerors, personal guarantors on an SBA 7(a) loan, originally obtained financing to purchase a commercial building in Lancaster, California.
The borrower filed for bankruptcy, and the third-party lender (TPL) foreclosed on the property. Despite the loan default, the SBA pursued the offerors for repayment. Given their limited income, lack of significant assets, and approaching retirement, we presented a strong case demonstrating their financial hardship.
Through strategic negotiations, we secured a favorable SBA settlement, reducing the nearly $1 million debt to a fraction of the amount owed. This outcome allowed the offerors to resolve their liability without prolonged financial strain.
.jpg)
.jpg)
