Factors That Can Affect the Success of an SBA Offer in Compromise Application
Factors That Can Affect the Success of an SBA Offer in Compromise Application
Small business owners who mismanage their finances could default on their Small Business Administration loan. To default, they must become delinquent for ninety days. At this point, their lender could exceed standard collection practices. These actions could include seizure of business assets such as bank accounts and real properties. A SBA Offer in Compromise could give the business owner an opportunity for settling the debt without serious repercussions.
After the SBA loan default, the lender notifies the borrower of probable action if they don't contact the lender and make arrangements for payment. The borrower has a deadline for these measures and should contact their attorney quickly. Once they have the SBA demand letter, their attorney could negotiate a settlement. Since the seizure process could increase the lender's costs, they are more likely to accept an appropriate offer.
Once the delinquency reaches ninety days, the loan enters default. At this stage, the lender is within their rights to acquire assets and the collateral used to secure the loan. They conduct the seizure process to acquire a balance that reflects what is owed by the borrower. Since the SBA is a government agency, they have federal rights and take action accordingly.
Any property listed on the loan documentation as collateral is seized immediately. This includes automobiles, real property, and business accounts. If this value doesn't reflect the balance owed, the agency could acquire more property and assets. Through a SBA loan foreclosure, they could acquire the borrower's primary residence if it was purchased with company funds.
A tax offset is a settlement in which the consumer could use their tax refunds to pay the balance. The lender seizes their tax refunds each year until the balance is paid off. If the borrower is behind on their tax payments, their attorney could acquire a settlement for the outstanding balance. A Tax Offset Program could help these consumers.
Small business owners should follow strategies for avoiding the effects of a SBA default. These actions could equate to total seizure of the business assets and properties. Business owners who wish to avoid these circumstances should contact an attorney now.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Clients executed personal and corporate guarantees for an SBA 7(a) loan from a Preferred Lender Provider (PLP). The borrower corporation defaulted on the loan exposing all collateral pledged by the Clients. The SBA subsequently acquired the loan balance from the PLP, including the right to collect against all guarantors. The SBA sent the Official Pre-Referral Notice to the guarantors giving them sixty (60) days to either pay the outstanding balance in full, negotiate a Repayment (Offer in Compromise (OIC) or Structured Workout (SW)), challenge their alleged guarantor liability or file a Request for Hearing (Appeals Petition) with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals.
Because the Clients were not financially eligible for an OIC, they opted for Structured Workout negotiations directly with the SBA before the debt was transferred to the Bureau of Fiscal Service, a division of the U.S. Department of Treasury for enforced collection.
The Firm was hired to negotiate a global Workout Agreement directly with the SBA to resolve the personal and corporate guarantees. After submitting the Structured Workout proposal, the assigned SBA Loan Specialist approved the requested terms in under ten (10) days without any lengthy back and forth negotiations.
The favorable terms of the Workout included an extended maturity at an affordable principal amount, along with a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Clients approximately $181,000 in administrative fees, penalties and interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)) as authorized by 31 U.S.C. § 3717(e) had the SBA loan been transferred to BFS.
Client received the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice for a loan that was obtained by her small business in 2001. The SBA loan went into default in 2004 but after hearing nothing from the SBA lender or the SBA for 20 years, out of the blue, she received the SBA's collection due process notice which provided her with only one of four options: (1) repay the entire accelerated balance immediately; (2) negotiate a repayment arrangement; (3) challenge the legal enforceability of the debt with evidence; or (4) request an OHA hearing before a U.S. Administrative Law Judge.
Client hired the Firm to represent her with only 13 days left before the expiration deadline to respond to the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice. The Firm attorneys immediately researched the SBA's Official loan database to obtain information regarding the 7(a) loan. Thereafter, the Firm attorneys conducted legal research and asserted certain affirmative defenses challenging the legal enforceability of the debt. A written response was timely filed to the 60-Day Notice with the SBA subsequently agreeing with the client's affirmative defenses and legal arguments. As a result, the SBA rendered a decision immediately terminating collection of the debt against the client's alleged personal guarantee liability saving her $50,000.
Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan to help with a relative’s new business venture. After the business failed, Treasury was able to secure a recurring Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against his monthly Social Security Benefits based on the claim that he owed over $1.2 million dollars. We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute, but then, prepared and filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals (SBA OHA). As a result of our efforts, we were able to convince the SBA to not only terminate the claimed debt of $1.2 million dollars against our client (without him having to file bankruptcy) but also refund the past recurring amounts that were offset from his Social Security Benefits in connection with the TOP levy.
.jpg)
