If you Owe more than $30,000 contact us for a case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
contact us for a free case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
Call us (833) 428-0937

What Borrowers Need to Know About  the Complete COVID Collections Act 

The Complete COVID Collections Act is crucial for borrowers with federal loans impacted by the pandemic. It aims to ensure that collection practices align with fairness, transparency, and accountability. For those facing aggressive enforcement measures, this legislation could provide clarity on debt relief processes and protections. 

What Borrowers Need to Know About  the Complete COVID Collections Act 

The Complete COVID Collections Act is crucial for borrowers with federal loans  impacted by the pandemic. It aims to ensure that collection practices align with fairness,  transparency, and accountability. For those facing aggressive enforcement measures,  this legislation could provide clarity on debt relief processes and protections.  Understanding its implications can help you navigate your financial challenges more  effectively. While legislative changes can feel overwhelming, this Act may reshape how  pandemic-related loan collections are handled, offering borrowers a fair chance to  resolve their obligations. 

Key Provisions of the Complete COVID  Collections Act 

The Complete COVID Collections Act introduces significant changes aimed at regulating  the handling of federal loans provided during the pandemic. For borrowers, it brings  clearer guidelines and enforces accountability among agencies tasked with monitoring  and recovering COVID-19 loans. Below, we break down the key provisions and their  implications. 

Loan Collections During COVID-19 

One major provision of the Act prohibits the suspension of loan collections for borrowers  impacted by the pandemic. This restriction means that borrowers must adhere to  repayment schedules without the option of temporary relief. While this directive may  seem restrictive, it ensures loans continue to circulate back into the economy to provide  much-needed liquidity. Borrowers should take note of this to avoid penalties or adverse  actions due to noncompliance. 

Referral of Claims to the Department of Treasury 

For loans under $100,000 that remain uncollected, the Act mandates that these claims  be referred to the Department of Treasury for further action. This step centralizes  collection efforts, allowing the Treasury to use tools like the Treasury Offset Program  (TOP) for recovery. Borrowers need to recognize the potential consequences, such as  wage garnishments or offsets against tax returns, and consider consulting experts to  address these claims effectively. Learn more about how the Treasury manages these  actions on their official webpage here. 

Fraud Enforcement Measures 

A standout feature of the Act is the 10-year limit for initiating fraud-related actions. This  extended timeframe underscores the government’s commitment to holding fraudsters  accountable. Borrowers who accessed loans ethically can take comfort knowing 

enforcement measures focus on misconduct, rather than penalizing struggling  businesses or individuals due to genuine financial hardships. 

Monthly Updates and Reporting 

The Act compels the SBA Administrator to provide Congress with monthly reports on  loan collection activities. This emphasis on regular documentation promotes  transparency and ensures oversight. For borrowers, this measure means that collection  activities are likely to be more regulated and consistently monitored, reducing the  likelihood of arbitrary or unaccountable enforcement actions. 

Data Transparency Requirements 

The Pandemic Response Accountability Committee is specifically tasked with  maintaining up-to-date data on recovered funds. This real-time tracking not only deters  misuse but also provides borrowers with clear benchmarks on how funds are being  managed. Accessing this data can help borrowers stay informed about the broader  implications and outcomes of loan recovery actions initiated under the Act. 

By understanding these provisions, borrowers can better prepare and position  themselves to navigate the complexities of federal loan collections under the Complete  COVID Collections Act. 

Covered Loans and Programs Defined 

As the Complete COVID Collections Act unfolds, understanding its scope begins with  recognizing the types of loans and programs it encompasses. Borrowers navigating  enforcement actions need clarity on what qualifies as a "covered loan" or "covered  program." Below, we provide a clear overview to help borrowers better grasp the  foundation of this legislation. 

Covered Loans 

Covered loans under this Act primarily refer to financial relief instruments guaranteed by  the Small Business Act, with a central focus on those created or expanded during the  COVID-19 response. These loans include: 

Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL): Designed to support businesses  facing revenue loss due to the pandemic, EIDL loans were vital in providing  immediate funds. However, their terms and collection requirements now make  them subject to scrutiny under this Act. 

Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loans: While originally intended as  forgivable loans for retaining employees, many borrowers still face complexities  in satisfying forgiveness guidelines, leading to potential repayment demands. 

504 and 7(a) Program Extensions: Certain pandemic-specific adjustments in  traditional SBA loan programs also come under this umbrella, confronting  borrowers with unique challenges tied to these guarantees. 

Borrowers must remember that each of these loans carries terms enforceable by law,  and falling into default places them under stricter federal collection mechanisms.

Covered Programs 

The Complete COVID Collections Act encompasses a range of initiatives designed to  safeguard businesses and employees during uncertain times. These programs include,  but are not limited to: 

Paycheck Protection Program (PPP): A keystone program of pandemic relief,  loans under this initiative targeted payroll retention. However, noncompliance  with terms has led to closer audits and potential clawbacks. 

Shuttered Venues Operators Grant (SVOG): This program focused on aiding  performance venues and similar businesses impacted by closures. While not a  loan, its inclusion here underscores the importance of compliance in grant terms. 

Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF): Foodservice businesses relied heavily  on this program to stabilize operations, yet unresolved balances and insufficient  documentation requirements sometimes overlap with loan collections. 

Each of these programs was instrumental during the crisis, but as federal entities now  prioritize collections and compliance, borrowers should review their financial standing  and documentation to mitigate risks associated with default or enforcement actions. 

Oversight and Accountability Measures 

The Complete COVID Collections Act emphasizes transparency and accountability  within federal relief programs, ensuring borrowers are not subjected to unfair or  unmonitored enforcement actions. Establishing robust oversight measures encourages  equitable treatment and enhances public trust in the recovery process. 

SBA and Inspector General Coordination 

One core aspect of this effort is the strengthened partnership between the Small  Business Administration (SBA) and its Office of Inspector General. Their collaboration  focuses on addressing inaccuracies, ensuring that data related to loan collections and  approvals is meticulously reported. By combining resources and expertise, this  alignment works to minimize errors, such as misreported loan defaults or  misclassifications, which can severely affect borrowers. 

For borrowers, this means enhanced scrutiny in how their cases are managed. Missteps  by agencies in earlier phases of loan processing are less likely to snowball into unjust  enforcement actions. This coordination also aims to identify and rectify systemic issues  in pandemic-related loan programs. Borrowers, especially those navigating disputes with  the SBA, may benefit indirectly from these intensified oversight mechanisms. 

Attorney General’s Monthly Reporting 

Another key feature of the Act is the role of the Attorney General in ensuring  accountability through regular updates. The Attorney General is required to submit  monthly reports detailing enforcement actions tied to pandemic relief programs. These  reports provide a critical layer of transparency, outlining penalties issued, fraud cases  addressed, and the overall effectiveness of collection efforts. 

For borrowers, this frequent reporting can shed light on the broader enforcement  landscape, providing a barometer for how rigorously regulations are being applied. It 

also demonstrates a commitment to target deliberate misconduct rather than honest  mistakes or financial distress. The documentation serves as a reminder of the  government’s capability to enforce compliance, signaling the importance of adhering to  loan terms while simultaneously advocating for fairness in enforcement practices. 

Legislative Intent and Future Implications 

The Complete COVID Collections Act is designed with a dual purpose: to provide relief  to borrowers while maintaining accountability in federal loan collections. It addresses the  unique challenges posed by pandemic-era loans, ensuring fair treatment for borrowers  while preserving the integrity of governmental lending programs. This section explores  how its legislative intent intersects with financial stability and the hurdles it faces. 

Maintaining Financial Accountability 

A key focus of the Act is fostering financial stability in a post-pandemic world. By  standardizing collection practices and easing the burden on borrowers, the Act aims to  create a more predictable and fair framework for repayment. How does this help  borrowers? It ensures fewer surprises when it comes to enforcement actions, allowing  individuals and businesses to plan their finances effectively. 

The Act also bolsters the foundation of economic recovery. By targetting abusive  collection practices and advocating for oversight, it ensures debts are managed without  putting undue pressure on struggling borrowers. This balance is essential—while loans  must eventually be repaid to sustain federal programs, borrowers should be able to  avoid spiraling into deeper financial crises. 

In this context, the Act enhances accountability for agencies like the SBA and Treasury.  Improved transparency in how funds are used and collected helps instill trust in the  borrower's community. With safeguards in place, such as required monthly updates and  centralized reporting, the Act minimizes the likelihood of inconsistencies or abuse during  the collection process. Borrowers navigating these systems can feel more confident  knowing that structured mechanisms protect them against arbitrary actions. 

Challenges and Criticisms 

No legislation is without its pitfalls, and the Complete COVID Collections Act is no  exception. Like any large-scale effort to reform collections, it has sparked debate among  various stakeholders. 

One frequent critique is whether the Act does enough to shield borrowers from  aggressive enforcement. Borrowers who defaulted during the pandemic often did so due  to external factors beyond their control. While the Act takes steps to outline fair collection  processes, critics argue it could further codify protections for borrowers facing severe  financial hardships. 

Additionally, there is concern about the costs associated with enforcement. Borrowers  may find that fees, penalties, and accumulated interest still create an insurmountable  financial hurdle. Even with greater oversight, the practical application of these provisions  depends heavily on the agencies tasked with execution. Missteps, such as  misclassifications or inconsistencies in borrower treatment, could jeopardize the Act's  intent.

Another challenge lies in educating borrowers. Complex legislative changes require  clear communication, yet many individuals and businesses remain uninformed about  their rights and options under the Act. Without proper outreach, borrowers may not fully  utilize the resources and protections available to navigate their debt effectively. 

Despite these criticisms, the Act remains a step forward in balancing borrower relief and  federal program accountability. For those caught in disputes or enforcement actions,  understanding the nuances and challenges of this legislation will be critical to achieving  resolution. 

How Borrowers Can Prepare and Protect  Themselves 

Navigating the complexities of federal loan collections, especially under the Complete  COVID Collections Act, can feel overwhelming. Borrowers often face high-pressure  situations if their loans default, making preparation and proactive measures essential.  Here’s how borrowers can protect themselves effectively. 

Understanding Your Loan Status 

The first step in safeguarding yourself is knowing exactly where you stand. Review the  specifics of your loan agreement, its terms, and your repayment status. Are you up-to date on payments, or have missed payments put your loan into default? Take note of  any correspondence from the SBA, your lender, or agencies like the Department of  Treasury. 

It's equally important to understand the potential penalties or actions lenders might  enforce under the Complete COVID Collections Act. Borrowers who are well-informed  about their loan status are better prepared to respond to collection efforts or negotiate  fairer terms. 

Keep all relevant documentation, including notices, statements, and past  correspondence, easy to access. These could prove invaluable in defending against  collection actions or making informed decisions about repayments. 

Seeking Professional Representation 

When dealing with federal loans, you don’t have to go it alone. Qualified federal debt  defense attorneys can provide the expertise needed to tackle complex cases. Legal  professionals understand the intricacies of government-backed loans and the unique  challenges posed by repayment enforcement under this Act. 

If you are feeling the weight of aggressive collection tactics, an experienced attorney can  evaluate your case, identify available defenses, and negotiate on your behalf.  Representation is especially critical for borrowers facing potential actions such as wage  garnishments, Treasury offsets, or litigation. Investing in proper legal guidance can not  only save you from costly mistakes but also protect your rights and financial stability. 

Exploring Negotiation and Settlement Options 

Not all collection situations require going to court. Borrowers should explore the  possibility of negotiation or settlement to alleviate the financial burden. Tools such as the  SBA Offer in Compromise (OIC) allow for the resolution of debts at a reduced amount, 

provided you meet specific eligibility criteria. This can be a lifeline for borrowers willing to  settle while avoiding the harsh consequences of a delinquent account. 

For those who may not qualify for an OIC, a Structured Workout may be an option. This  approach involves working out a manageable repayment plan with adjusted terms, such  as lower interest rates or extended maturities. Borrowers who act early often find that  negotiating a fair settlement is less daunting than expected. 

By taking these steps, you can position yourself to handle federal loan collections with  confidence, while mitigating long-term financial repercussions. 

Next Steps

The Complete COVID Collections Act highlights the importance of clean, structured  processes in federal loan collections. Borrowers impacted by federal loan defaults now  have clearer guidelines and protections amidst enforcement actions. Staying informed  and actively managing your loan obligations under this Act can help reduce risks and  improve outcomes. 

If you’re navigating these challenges, seeking professional legal advice can provide the  expertise needed to secure your financial stability. Don't wait—proactively addressing  the implications of this Act could make all the difference in safeguarding your rights and  future.

$150,000 SBA COVID EIDL - OFFER IN COMPROMISE & RELEASE OF COLLATERAL

$150,000 SBA COVID EIDL - OFFER IN COMPROMISE & RELEASE OF COLLATERAL

Our firm successfully facilitated the SBA settlement of a COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) f borrower received an SBA disaster loan of $150,000, but due to the severe economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the business was unable to recover.

Despite the borrower’s efforts to maintain operations, shutdowns and restrictions significantly reduced the customer base and revenue, making continued operations unsustainable. After a thorough business closure review, we negotiated with the SBA, securing a resolution where the borrower paid only $6,015 to release the collateral, with no further financial liability for the owner/officer.

This case demonstrates how businesses affected by the pandemic can navigate SBA loan settlements effectively. If your business is struggling with an SBA EIDL loan, we specialize in SBA Offer in Compromise (SBA OIC) solutions to help close outstanding debts while minimizing financial burden.

$310,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM WORKOUT

$310,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM WORKOUT

Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan for $100,000 from the lender. The SBA loan went into early default in 2006 less than 12 months from disbursement. The SBA paid the 7(a) guaranty monies to the lender and subsequently acquired the deficiency balance of about $96,000, including the right to collect against the guarantor. However, the SBA sent the Official 60-Day Due Process Notice to the Client's defunct business address instead of his personal residence, which he never received. As a result, the debt was transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service where substantial collection fees were assessed, including accrued interest per the promissory note. Treasury eventually referred the debt to a Private Collection Agency (PCA) - Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. Pioneer sent a demand letter claiming a debt balance of almost $310,000 - a shocking 223% increase from the original loan amount assigned to the SBA. Client's social security disability benefits were seized through the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). Client hired the Firm to represent him as the debt continued to snowball despite seizure of his social security benefits and federal tax refunds as the involuntary payments were first applied to Treasury's collection fees, then to accrued interest with minimal allocation to the SBA principal balance.

We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute (CSD) challenging the referral of the debt to Treasury based on the defective notice sent to the defunct business address. Despite overwhelming evidence proving a violation of the Client's Due Process rights, the SBA still rejected the CSD. As a result, an Appeals Petition was filed with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) Court challenging the SBA decision and its certification the debt was legally enforceable in the amount claimed. After several months of litigation before the SBA OHA Court, our Firm Attorney successfully negotiated an Offer in Compromise (OIC) Term Workout with the SBA Supervising Trial Attorney for $82,000 spread over a term of 74 months at a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Client an estimated $241,000 in Treasury collection fees, accrued interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)), and the PCA contingency fee.

$975,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC CASH SETTLEMENT

$975,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC CASH SETTLEMENT

Our firm successfully negotiated an SBA offer in compromise (SBA OIC), settling a $974,535.93 SBA loan balance for just $18,000. The offerors, personal guarantors on an SBA 7(a) loan, originally obtained financing to purchase a commercial building in Lancaster, California.

The borrower filed for bankruptcy, and the third-party lender (TPL) foreclosed on the property. Despite the loan default, the SBA pursued the offerors for repayment. Given their limited income, lack of significant assets, and approaching retirement, we presented a strong case demonstrating their financial hardship.

Through strategic negotiations, we secured a favorable SBA settlement, reducing the nearly $1 million debt to a fraction of the amount owed. This outcome allowed the offerors to resolve their liability without prolonged financial strain.

Read more Case Results