Current SBA Guidelines on EIDL Loan Settlements
Struggling with a COVID EIDL loan? Learn how the SBA's Offer in Compromise works in 2025, eligibility rules, and settlement options before policies change.
Learn about different bankruptcy options for small business owners. Contact Protect Law Group serving San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles Counties.
Book a Consultation CallFor small business owners facing overwhelming debt burdens, bankruptcy can be a viable option for gaining financial relief and a fresh start. However, when it comes to dealing with Small Business Administration (SBA) debt, understanding the bankruptcy options available is crucial. In this blog post, Protect Law Group will explore the various bankruptcy options specifically tailored for small business owners with SBA debts.
Chapter 7 bankruptcy, also known as liquidation bankruptcy, is a common option for small business owners looking to eliminate their SBA debts. Through this process, the business's assets are liquidated, and the proceeds will be used to pay off creditors, including the SBA. Once the debts are discharged, the business owner can start anew without the burden of SBA obligations.
For small business owners who wish to continue operating their businesses while seeking debt relief, Chapter 11 bankruptcy may be the right option. This type of bankruptcy allows for the restructuring of debts, including SBA loans, by developing a repayment plan that is manageable for the business. The plan typically extends the repayment period and may involve negotiating reduced interest rates or lower monthly payments.
In some cases, small business owners may be able to negotiate loan workouts or settlements directly with the SBA. This involves discussing revised repayment terms or exploring the possibility of settling the debt for a reduced amount. Working with an experienced bankruptcy attorney during these negotiations can greatly increase the chances of securing favorable terms.
The SBA offers an option called an Offer in Compromise (OIC), which allows small business owners to settle their SBA debts for less than the amount owed. This option is typically available if the business demonstrates an inability to repay the debt in full and can provide supporting financial documentation. While an OIC can be a viable solution, it's important to note that the decision lies with the SBA.
For small business owners struggling with SBA debts, exploring bankruptcy options can provide a path to financial recovery. Book a consultation call with one of Protect Law Group’s SBA loan attorneys serving San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles Counties today!
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $324,000 to buy a small business and its facility. The business and real estate had an appraisal value of $318,000 at the time of purchase. The business ultimately failed but the participating lender abandoned the business equipment and real estate collateral even though it had valid security liens. As a result, the lender recouped nearly nothing from the pledged collateral, leaving the business owners liable for the deficiency balance. The SBA paid the lender the 7(a) guaranty money and was assigned ownership of the debt, including the right to collect. However, the clients never received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and were denied the opportunity to negotiate an Offer in Compromise (OIC) or a Workout directly with the SBA before being transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service, which added an additional $80,000 in collection fees. Treasury garnished and offset the clients' wages, federal salary and social security benefits. When the clients tried to negotiate with Treasury by themselves, they were offered an unaffordable repayment plan which would have caused severe financial hardship. Clients subsequently hired the Firm to litigate an Appeals Petition before the SBA Office & Hearings Appeals (OHA) challenging the legal enforceability and amount of the debt. The Firm successfully negotiated a term OIC that was approved by the SBA Office of General Counsel, saving the clients approximately $205,000.
Clients personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan that was referred to the Department of Treasury for collection. Treasury claimed our clients owed over $220,000 once it added its statutory collection fees and interest. We were able to negotiate a significant reduction of the total claimed amount from $220,000 to $119,000, saving the clients over $100,000 by arguing for a waiver of the statutory 28%-30% administrative fees and costs.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.
.jpg)
