Protect Law Group can provide the path forward for SBA debtors and guarantors before claims are made against your estate. Book a consultation call with us today!
Book a Consultation Call
As a result of the 2008 Great Recession, my dad's small business failed leaving a defaulted and outstanding Small Business Administration (SBA) loan of $500,000 secured by his personal guarantee. In addition, the Treasury Department's Bureau of Fiscal Service has been sending notices for payment with substantial costs, fees penalties and interest in the amount of $160,000. But when you ask Treasury collection agents to provide proof of the additional amount, they provide no explanation or corroborating evidence.
My dad passed away recently ... leaving my 82 year old mom the family home with a mortgage and an SBA lien in junior position. During his retirement, dad's Social Security Income was garnished for years as a result of a Treasury Offset Program levy but the balance never decreased. It appears the SBA principal loan balance, Treasury's substantial collection fees and accruing interest were so much more than what was levied to even make a dent against the overall debt balance. Mom has some funds in an IRA account but to just forfeit that money to Treasury would leave her vulnerable with no safety net if she were to fall ill and need medical attention for services not covered by Medicare or her supplemental health insurance. We have been going back and forth with Treasury to negotiate a settlement, but it’s been several years with no resolution. Mom is experiencing a lot of stress around what the government could seize or force for repayment of a debt that is practically impossible to pay back out-of-pocket.
Dad left a sizeable estate after he passed. But my mom and the family are worried if and when she passes, can the SBA or Treasury make claims and seize the remaining assets of the estate to satisfy the $660,000 debt balance? If this story sounds eerily familar, read on.
When a decedent signs a personal guarantee, establishing liability for SBA or Treasury debt, the estate may be liable for satisfying that debt. This is how the process generally works.
An personal guarantee is a legally binding commitment that ensures the guarantor is personally responsible for repaying the SBA debt if the primary obligor (often a business) defaults. Upon the guarantor's death, the estate steps into the decedent’s shoes and assumes the obligations, including the SBA debt covered by the personal guarantee.
Under the Uniform Probate Code (UPC), which many states follow, the estate must pay off the decedent’s debts, including those guaranteed through a personal guarantee, before distributing any remaining assets to heirs. If the estate cannot satisfy the debt, creditors may attempt to make claims against any assets within the estate.
The SBA and the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service can file claims against a decedent's estate during the probate process. This is grounded in the principle that debts do not disappear upon death. Instead, they must be settled from the decedent’s estate.
Under 31 U.S.C. §3713, the federal government’s claims take priority over most other creditors during the administration of the estate. This means that if the decedent's estate owes the federal government (e.g., SBA loan guaranteed by the decedent),those claims must generally be satisfied before most other unsecured creditors.
The UPC provides that creditors, including the federal government, may file claims against the decedent’s estate within a certain period after the death. The estate’s personal representative (executor) is responsible for notifying creditors and paying valid claimsbefore any distribution to beneficiaries (§ 3-801 to 3-803 UPC).
During probate, creditors, including the SBA and Treasury, will be notified of the death and given the opportunity to submit claims. The personal representative of the estate is required to pay all legitimate debts, taxes, and expenses of administration from the estate’s assets before distributing the remainder to the heirs or beneficiaries.
31 U.S.C. § 3713(a)(1)(B) requires that the estate’s personal representative pay the government’s claims before paying any other debts or making distributions from the estate. Failure to prioritize federal claims could result in personal liability for the executor.
Under 26 U.S.C. § 6324, federal tax liens can attach to the estate, which would affect the distribution of assets if taxes or debts to the federal government are outstanding.
Treasury’s Bureau of Fiscal Service is responsible for collecting delinquent federal debts, including those arising from SBA loans. The collection mechanisms they may use include:
Treasury can intercept tax refunds, Social Security payments, and other federal disbursements due to the decedent's estate underthe Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA).
If the decedent’s estate contains income-generating assets, Fiscal Service may seek wage garnishment or place liens on the estate's property to satisfy the outstanding debt.
To mitigate the risk of such claims against the estate, individuals may engage in estate planning and asset protection strategies prior to death. However, certain strategies may not shield assets from federal creditors if the debt existed prior to death or if fraudulent conveyance laws are implicated.
While irrevocable trusts may shield assets from certain creditors, the Federal Debt Collection ProceduresAct (28 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.) may permit the government to pierce such trusts in some circumstances if the decedent retained control over the assets or if the trust was created with the intent to defraud creditors.
Many states provide homestead exemptions that protect a portion of the decedent’s residence from creditors. However, federal claims often take precedence over state law protections.
Under certain state laws, assets passing directly to a surviving spouse through joint tenancy or survivorship mechanisms may be protected from creditor claims. However, if the decedent's estate is insufficient to cover the debt, the federal government could still pursue the spouse if he or she signed the guarantee or are otherwise liable.
In practical terms, when a decedent has signed a personal guarantee, it is essential for the executor or personal representative to thoroughly assess the outstanding obligations and prioritize federal debts as required by law. Failure to address SBA or Treasury debts could expose the estate and its beneficiaries to significant legal risks, including possible enforcement actions by the federal government.
The estate of a decedent who signed a personal guarantee remains liable for the guaranteed debt, and the SBA and Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service can make claims against the estate under federal law. These claims typically take priority over other unsecured creditors, and collection actions may involve offsetting federal payments, garnishments, or property liens. Effective estate planning may help mitigate some risks, but federal debt remains difficult to avoid. It's recommended that debtors do not wait until their time is up. It's better to act now, explore strategies, and execute a plan to resolve the SBA or Treasury debt during your lifetime through remedial measures such as Offer in Compromise, Repayment, Workout or Bankruptcy.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.
Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for their small business in the amount of $298,000. They pledged their primary residence and personal guarantees as direct collateral for the loan. The business failed, the lender was paid the 7(a) guaranty money and the debt was assigned to the SBA. Clients received the Official 60-Day Notice giving them a couple of options to resolve the debt balance directly with the SBA before referral to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service. The risk of referral to Treasury would add nearly $95,000 to the SBA principal loan balance. With the default interest rate at 7.5%, the amount of money to pay toward interest was projected at $198,600. Clients hired the Firm with only 4 days left to respond to the 60-Day due process notice. Because the clients were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) due to the significant equity in their home and the SBA lien encumbering it, the Firm Attorneys proposed a Structured Workout to resolve the SBA debt. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist assigned to the case approved the Workout terms which prevented potential foreclosure of their home, but also saved the clients approximately $294,000 over the agreed-upon Workout term with a waiver of all contractual and statutory administrative fees, collection costs, penalties, and interest.
Client received the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice for a loan that was obtained by her small business in 2001. The SBA loan went into default in 2004 but after hearing nothing from the SBA lender or the SBA for 20 years, out of the blue, she received the SBA's collection due process notice which provided her with only one of four options: (1) repay the entire accelerated balance immediately; (2) negotiate a repayment arrangement; (3) challenge the legal enforceability of the debt with evidence; or (4) request an OHA hearing before a U.S. Administrative Law Judge.
Client hired the Firm to represent her with only 13 days left before the expiration deadline to respond to the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice. The Firm attorneys immediately researched the SBA's Official loan database to obtain information regarding the 7(a) loan. Thereafter, the Firm attorneys conducted legal research and asserted certain affirmative defenses challenging the legal enforceability of the debt. A written response was timely filed to the 60-Day Notice with the SBA subsequently agreeing with the client's affirmative defenses and legal arguments. As a result, the SBA rendered a decision immediately terminating collection of the debt against the client's alleged personal guarantee liability saving her $50,000.
.jpg)
.jpeg)