Protect Law Group can provide the path forward for SBA debtors and guarantors before claims are made against your estate. Book a consultation call with us today!
Book a Consultation Call
As a result of the 2008 Great Recession, my dad's small business failed leaving a defaulted and outstanding Small Business Administration (SBA) loan of $500,000 secured by his personal guarantee. In addition, the Treasury Department's Bureau of Fiscal Service has been sending notices for payment with substantial costs, fees penalties and interest in the amount of $160,000. But when you ask Treasury collection agents to provide proof of the additional amount, they provide no explanation or corroborating evidence.
My dad passed away recently ... leaving my 82 year old mom the family home with a mortgage and an SBA lien in junior position. During his retirement, dad's Social Security Income was garnished for years as a result of a Treasury Offset Program levy but the balance never decreased. It appears the SBA principal loan balance, Treasury's substantial collection fees and accruing interest were so much more than what was levied to even make a dent against the overall debt balance. Mom has some funds in an IRA account but to just forfeit that money to Treasury would leave her vulnerable with no safety net if she were to fall ill and need medical attention for services not covered by Medicare or her supplemental health insurance. We have been going back and forth with Treasury to negotiate a settlement, but it’s been several years with no resolution. Mom is experiencing a lot of stress around what the government could seize or force for repayment of a debt that is practically impossible to pay back out-of-pocket.
Dad left a sizeable estate after he passed. But my mom and the family are worried if and when she passes, can the SBA or Treasury make claims and seize the remaining assets of the estate to satisfy the $660,000 debt balance? If this story sounds eerily familar, read on.
When a decedent signs a personal guarantee, establishing liability for SBA or Treasury debt, the estate may be liable for satisfying that debt. This is how the process generally works.
An personal guarantee is a legally binding commitment that ensures the guarantor is personally responsible for repaying the SBA debt if the primary obligor (often a business) defaults. Upon the guarantor's death, the estate steps into the decedent’s shoes and assumes the obligations, including the SBA debt covered by the personal guarantee.
Under the Uniform Probate Code (UPC), which many states follow, the estate must pay off the decedent’s debts, including those guaranteed through a personal guarantee, before distributing any remaining assets to heirs. If the estate cannot satisfy the debt, creditors may attempt to make claims against any assets within the estate.
The SBA and the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service can file claims against a decedent's estate during the probate process. This is grounded in the principle that debts do not disappear upon death. Instead, they must be settled from the decedent’s estate.
Under 31 U.S.C. §3713, the federal government’s claims take priority over most other creditors during the administration of the estate. This means that if the decedent's estate owes the federal government (e.g., SBA loan guaranteed by the decedent),those claims must generally be satisfied before most other unsecured creditors.
The UPC provides that creditors, including the federal government, may file claims against the decedent’s estate within a certain period after the death. The estate’s personal representative (executor) is responsible for notifying creditors and paying valid claimsbefore any distribution to beneficiaries (§ 3-801 to 3-803 UPC).
During probate, creditors, including the SBA and Treasury, will be notified of the death and given the opportunity to submit claims. The personal representative of the estate is required to pay all legitimate debts, taxes, and expenses of administration from the estate’s assets before distributing the remainder to the heirs or beneficiaries.
31 U.S.C. § 3713(a)(1)(B) requires that the estate’s personal representative pay the government’s claims before paying any other debts or making distributions from the estate. Failure to prioritize federal claims could result in personal liability for the executor.
Under 26 U.S.C. § 6324, federal tax liens can attach to the estate, which would affect the distribution of assets if taxes or debts to the federal government are outstanding.
Treasury’s Bureau of Fiscal Service is responsible for collecting delinquent federal debts, including those arising from SBA loans. The collection mechanisms they may use include:
Treasury can intercept tax refunds, Social Security payments, and other federal disbursements due to the decedent's estate underthe Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA).
If the decedent’s estate contains income-generating assets, Fiscal Service may seek wage garnishment or place liens on the estate's property to satisfy the outstanding debt.
To mitigate the risk of such claims against the estate, individuals may engage in estate planning and asset protection strategies prior to death. However, certain strategies may not shield assets from federal creditors if the debt existed prior to death or if fraudulent conveyance laws are implicated.
While irrevocable trusts may shield assets from certain creditors, the Federal Debt Collection ProceduresAct (28 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.) may permit the government to pierce such trusts in some circumstances if the decedent retained control over the assets or if the trust was created with the intent to defraud creditors.
Many states provide homestead exemptions that protect a portion of the decedent’s residence from creditors. However, federal claims often take precedence over state law protections.
Under certain state laws, assets passing directly to a surviving spouse through joint tenancy or survivorship mechanisms may be protected from creditor claims. However, if the decedent's estate is insufficient to cover the debt, the federal government could still pursue the spouse if he or she signed the guarantee or are otherwise liable.
In practical terms, when a decedent has signed a personal guarantee, it is essential for the executor or personal representative to thoroughly assess the outstanding obligations and prioritize federal debts as required by law. Failure to address SBA or Treasury debts could expose the estate and its beneficiaries to significant legal risks, including possible enforcement actions by the federal government.
The estate of a decedent who signed a personal guarantee remains liable for the guaranteed debt, and the SBA and Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service can make claims against the estate under federal law. These claims typically take priority over other unsecured creditors, and collection actions may involve offsetting federal payments, garnishments, or property liens. Effective estate planning may help mitigate some risks, but federal debt remains difficult to avoid. It's recommended that debtors do not wait until their time is up. It's better to act now, explore strategies, and execute a plan to resolve the SBA or Treasury debt during your lifetime through remedial measures such as Offer in Compromise, Repayment, Workout or Bankruptcy.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan for $350,000. The small business failed but because of the personal guarantee liability, the client continued to pay the monthly principal & interest out-of-pocket draining his savings. The client hired a local attorney but quickly realized that he was not familiar with SBA-backed loans or their standard operating procedures. Our firm was subsequently hired after the client received the SBA's official 60-day notice. After back-and-forth negotiations, we were able to convince the SBA to reinstate the loan, retract the acceleration of the outstanding balance, modify the original terms, and approve a structured workout reducing the interest rate from 7.75% to 0% and extending the maturity date for a longer period to make the monthly payments affordable. In conclusion, not only we were able to help the client avoid litigation and bankruptcy, but our SBA lawyers also saved him approximately $227,945 over the term of the workout.
Our firm successfully resolved an SBA COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) default in the amount of $150,000 on behalf of Illinois-based client. After the business permanently closed due to the economic impacts of the pandemic, the owners faced potential personal liability if the business collateral was not liquidated properly under the SBA Security Agreement.
We guided the client through the SBA’s Business Closure Review process, prepared a comprehensive financial submission, and negotiated directly with the SBA to release the collateral securing the loan. The borrower satisfied their collateral obligations with a payment of $2,075, resolving the SBA’s security interest.
Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan for $100,000 from the lender. The SBA loan went into early default in 2006 less than 12 months from disbursement. The SBA paid the 7(a) guaranty monies to the lender and subsequently acquired the deficiency balance of about $96,000, including the right to collect against the guarantor. However, the SBA sent the Official 60-Day Due Process Notice to the Client's defunct business address instead of his personal residence, which he never received. As a result, the debt was transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service where substantial collection fees were assessed, including accrued interest per the promissory note. Treasury eventually referred the debt to a Private Collection Agency (PCA) - Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. Pioneer sent a demand letter claiming a debt balance of almost $310,000 - a shocking 223% increase from the original loan amount assigned to the SBA. Client's social security disability benefits were seized through the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). Client hired the Firm to represent him as the debt continued to snowball despite seizure of his social security benefits and federal tax refunds as the involuntary payments were first applied to Treasury's collection fees, then to accrued interest with minimal allocation to the SBA principal balance.
We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute (CSD) challenging the referral of the debt to Treasury based on the defective notice sent to the defunct business address. Despite overwhelming evidence proving a violation of the Client's Due Process rights, the SBA still rejected the CSD. As a result, an Appeals Petition was filed with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) Court challenging the SBA decision and its certification the debt was legally enforceable in the amount claimed. After several months of litigation before the SBA OHA Court, our Firm Attorney successfully negotiated an Offer in Compromise (OIC) Term Workout with the SBA Supervising Trial Attorney for $82,000 spread over a term of 74 months at a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Client an estimated $241,000 in Treasury collection fees, accrued interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)), and the PCA contingency fee.
.jpg)
