If you Owe more than $30,000 contact us for a case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
contact us for a free case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
Call us (833) 428-0937

Can you stop an administrative wage garnishment once it starts?

Yes, you may stop an administrative wage garnishment once it starts. If you did not have a hearing, have new evidence or changed finances it may stop.

Book a Consultation Call

Can you stop an administrative wage garnishment once it starts?

Yes, you may be able to stop an administrative wage garnishment once it starts.

Stop Administrative Wage Garnishment

How Does An Administrative Wage Garnishment Start?

The Treasury will send you a notice of its intent to order an administrative wage garnishment.  Thereafter, you can request a hearing.  The hearing is usually a "paper hearing".  This means you do not appear personally. Instead, you submit a legal brief and supporting evidence.  However, if you fail to request a hearing timely, the Treasury will issue an administrative wage garnishment order to your employer.  Similarly, if the hearing is held and the hearing officer finds in favor of the government, your wages will be garnished.

Submit A Late Hearing Request

Once the administrative wage garnishment starts, you may stop it in limited circumstances.   As stated, if you fail to submit your hearing request, the administrative wage garnishment order will issue.  However, you can still submit a hearing request late.   Thereafter, if a hearing officer does not make a decision within 60 days, the administrative wage garnishment will be suspended.  The suspension will go into effect on the 61st day after your hearing request.

You Obtain New Evidence

If you did request a hearing and the hearing officer ruled against you, you may obtain a new hearing if you obtain new evidence.  However, the government will not provide you with a new hearing simply because you disagree with the hearing officer's initial decision.  Instead, you must have obtained new evidence that would exonerate you from the administrative wage garnishment.

Your Financial Situation Changes For The Worse

If your wages are subject to garnishment but your financial circumstances change, you may qualify for a financial hardship exemption.  For instance, at the time of the original hearing your spouse may have been employed.  But in the interim, your spouse suffered a lay off and remains unemployed, cutting your household income in half.  As such, you may request a new hearing based on the financial hardship the garnishment now causes as you can't meet your basic living expenses.  Keep in mind, you will have to provide financial documentation to prove the garnishment constitutes a financial hardship.

Contact Protect Law Group Today If The Government Is Garnishing Your Wages

Our attorneys have years of experience dealing with administrative wage garnishments.  Contact us today for a free initial consultation - 833-428-0934

Why Hire Us to Help You with Your Treasury or SBA Debt Problems?

construction accident injury lawyer

Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure

slip and fall attorney

Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements

truck accident injury attorney

Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.

$975,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC CASH SETTLEMENT

$975,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC CASH SETTLEMENT

Our firm successfully negotiated an SBA offer in compromise (SBA OIC), settling a $974,535.93 SBA loan balance for just $18,000. The offerors, personal guarantors on an SBA 7(a) loan, originally obtained financing to purchase a commercial building in Lancaster, California.

The borrower filed for bankruptcy, and the third-party lender (TPL) foreclosed on the property. Despite the loan default, the SBA pursued the offerors for repayment. Given their limited income, lack of significant assets, and approaching retirement, we presented a strong case demonstrating their financial hardship.

Through strategic negotiations, we secured a favorable SBA settlement, reducing the nearly $1 million debt to a fraction of the amount owed. This outcome allowed the offerors to resolve their liability without prolonged financial strain.

$300,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM SETTLEMENT

$300,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM SETTLEMENT

Clients personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan balance of over $300,000.  Clients also pledged their homes as additional collateral.  SBA OIC accepted $87,000 with the full lien release against the home.

$310,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM WORKOUT

$310,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM WORKOUT

Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan for $100,000 from the lender. The SBA loan went into early default in 2006 less than 12 months from disbursement. The SBA paid the 7(a) guaranty monies to the lender and subsequently acquired the deficiency balance of about $96,000, including the right to collect against the guarantor. However, the SBA sent the Official 60-Day Due Process Notice to the Client's defunct business address instead of his personal residence, which he never received. As a result, the debt was transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service where substantial collection fees were assessed, including accrued interest per the promissory note. Treasury eventually referred the debt to a Private Collection Agency (PCA) - Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. Pioneer sent a demand letter claiming a debt balance of almost $310,000 - a shocking 223% increase from the original loan amount assigned to the SBA. Client's social security disability benefits were seized through the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). Client hired the Firm to represent him as the debt continued to snowball despite seizure of his social security benefits and federal tax refunds as the involuntary payments were first applied to Treasury's collection fees, then to accrued interest with minimal allocation to the SBA principal balance.

We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute (CSD) challenging the referral of the debt to Treasury based on the defective notice sent to the defunct business address. Despite overwhelming evidence proving a violation of the Client's Due Process rights, the SBA still rejected the CSD. As a result, an Appeals Petition was filed with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) Court challenging the SBA decision and its certification the debt was legally enforceable in the amount claimed. After several months of litigation before the SBA OHA Court, our Firm Attorney successfully negotiated an Offer in Compromise (OIC) Term Workout with the SBA Supervising Trial Attorney for $82,000 spread over a term of 74 months at a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Client an estimated $241,000 in Treasury collection fees, accrued interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)), and the PCA contingency fee.

Read more Case Results

Related Content

Read more sba debt articles