Pros and Cons of SBA Loan Modification
Discover the pros & cons of SBA loan modification with Protect Law Group. Expert SBA debt relief help for small businesses. Take control today!
As many as 80 percent of new small businesses fail within 18 months of opening their doors. By year 10, the number climbs to 96 percent. These are not poorly operated companies being run by unprepared entrepreneurs. Many of them fall victim to a weak local economy, uncontrollable circumstances and too much competition in their area. All of these business will have debt they default on, and many will have SBA loans they are unable to pay back as expected.
An SBA loan default can result in the loss of business property, business accounts being seized and personal property may be seized as well. The result can be financially devastating for the business owner who is already struggling. It can lead to wage garnishments for the borrower and prevent them from receiving any future loans from the SBA. If the amount collected is insufficient, the U.S. Treasury can take the reins and collect through the Tax Offset Program. This can result in additional fees and interest charges being added to the debt and any tax refunds will be seized or garnished until the amount is repaid in full.
To reduce the impact to the borrower, an SBA Offer in Compromise is an option that may make it easier for the borrower to satisfy their end of the agreement without losing all of their property. This method is not allowed if the borrower already has the means to repay the loan. Borrowers who are able to pay a lump sum or a repayment plan that will not exceed 5 years are more likely to get their offer approved.
It will benefit the borrower to contact the SBA or an attorney before they reach the point of forcing an SBA loan foreclosure. The collection methods with the SBA are similar to other debts. Missed payments will traditionally result in collections calls and letters. If an SBA demand letter is received, it is important to respond to it, but to do so correctly. Contacting an attorney familiar with this type of legal matter will make it much easier to avoid making common mistakes that could have serious financial consequences. SBA collection processes can be aggressive, so do not ignore the warnings. Take action immediately to reduce the potential impact.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Clients borrowed and personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan. Clients defaulted on the SBA loan and were sued in federal district court for breach of contract. The SBA lender demanded the Client pledge several personal real estate properties as collateral to reinstate and secure the defaulted SBA loan. We were subsequently hired to intervene and aggressively defend the lawsuit. After several months of litigation, our attorneys negotiated a reinstatement of the SBA loan and a structured workout that did not involve any liens against the Client's personal real estate holdings.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000. He and his wife signed personal guarantees and pledged their home as collateral. The SBA loan went into default, the term or maturity date was accelerated and demand for payment of the entire amount claimed was made. The SBA lender’s note gave it the right to adjust the default interest rate from 7.25% to 18% per annum. The business filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy but was dismissed after 3 years due to its inability to continue with payments under the plan. Clients wanted to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which would have been a mistake as their home had significant equity to repay the SBA loan balance in full as the Trustee would likely seize and sell the home to repay the secured and unsecured creditors. However, the SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection to the SBA. Clients then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and hired the Firm to respond to it and negotiate on their behalf. Clients disputed the SBA’s alleged balance of $148,000, as several payments made to the SBA lender during the Chapter 11 reorganization were not accounted for. To challenge the SBA’s claimed debt balance, the Firm Attorneys initiated expedited discovery to obtain government records. SBA records disclosed the true amount owed was about $97,000. Moreover, because the Clients’ home had significant equity, they were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise or an immediate Release of Lien for Consideration, despite being incorrectly advised by non-attorney consulting companies that they were. Instead, our Firm Attorneys recommended a Workout of $97,000 spread over a lengthy term and a waiver of the applicable interest rate making the monthly payment affordable. After back and forth negotiations, SBA approved the Workout proposal, thereby saving the home from imminent foreclosure and reducing the Clients' liability by nearly $81,000 in incorrect principal balance, accrued interest, and statutory collection fees.
Small business and guarantors obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $1,000,000. Clients defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for collection. Treasury added nearly $500,000 in collection fees totaling $1,500,000. Clients were served with the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice and exercised the Repayment option by applying for the SBA’s Hardship Accommodation Plan. However, their application was summarily rejected by the SBA without providing any meaningful reasons. Clients hired the Firm to represent them against the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury. During litigation and before the OHA court issued a final Decision and Order, the Firm successfully negotiated a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, a modification of the original repayment terms, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.
.jpg)
