5 Factors to Consider in an SBA Offer in Compromise
Offer in Compromise is a way for a small business to close when it is clear that they won't be able to pay their debts, but here are 5 factors to consider
Discover the truth behind common misconceptions about SBA Offers in Compromise. Get insights into the myths of the OIC. Find out how to navigate these misconceptions effectively.
Book a Consultation CallWhen it comes to the world of small business finances, one topic that often causes confusion and uncertainty is SBA (Small Business Administration) Offers in Compromise (OIC). However, along with genuine information, there are several misconceptions floating around that can mislead business owners. In this comprehensive guide, we're here to debunk these myths and provide accurate insights into SBA Offers in Compromise.
Many business owners believe that once they apply for an SBA Offer in Compromise, their SBA debts will automatically be reduced, and their financial burdens will disappear. However, this is far from the truth. SBA Offers in Compromise go through a rigorous evaluation process, and not all offers are accepted. The success of your offer depends on various factors, including your ability to demonstrate genuine financial distress.
Some people think that applying for an SBA Offer in Compromise is as easy as filling out a basic form. In reality, the application process is complex and requires meticulous attention to detail. It involves submitting detailed financial information, tax documents, and a compelling case for your financial hardship. Working with an attorney experienced in SBA OICs can significantly improve your chances of success.
It's a common misconception that only people on the verge of bankruptcy qualify for an SBA Offer in Compromise. While financial hardship is a key criterion, it doesn't mean you need to be on the brink of collapse. As long as you can prove that paying the full amount would cause significant financial strain, you may be eligible.
Another misconception is that applying for an SBA Offer in Compromise puts an immediate stop to all collections activities by the SBA or Treasury. While the application is being evaluated collections can continue.
Every person's financial situation is unique, and SBA Offers in Compromise are not a standardized solution. The SBA takes into account various factors, including your assets, income, expenses, and future earning potential, when evaluating your application. There is no one-size-fits-all approach, and outcomes can vary widely.
While successfully settling your debt through an SBA Offer in Compromise is a positive step, it doesn't automatically repair your credit score overnight. The process of rebuilding your credit takes time and consistent financial responsibility.
The SBA's standard operating procedures state that such an offer is permissible, but in practice the SBA usually requires that the business has been closed with the secretary of state.
No, there are no upfront fees required to submit an application for an SBA Offer in Compromise. However, qualified legal counsel will request payment for their services. Furthermore, most accepted OICs must be paid in a lump sum within 60 days of acceptance.
Once the SBA accepts your Offer in Compromise, you are bound by the terms. Negotiation is not possible after acceptance.
The processing time for an SBA Offer in Compromise can vary widely, often taking several months. Patience is crucial during this period.
Separating fact from fiction is vital when it comes to SBA Offers in Compromise. By dispelling these common misconceptions, we hope to provide clarity and guidance for business owners seeking solutions to their SBA debt challenges. Remember, seeking professional advice and thoroughly understanding the process can significantly increase your chances of a successful outcome. Please contact us for more information.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.
Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $324,000 to buy a small business and its facility. The business and real estate had an appraisal value of $318,000 at the time of purchase. The business ultimately failed but the participating lender abandoned the business equipment and real estate collateral even though it had valid security liens. As a result, the lender recouped nearly nothing from the pledged collateral, leaving the business owners liable for the deficiency balance. The SBA paid the lender the 7(a) guaranty money and was assigned ownership of the debt, including the right to collect. However, the clients never received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and were denied the opportunity to negotiate an Offer in Compromise (OIC) or a Workout directly with the SBA before being transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service, which added an additional $80,000 in collection fees. Treasury garnished and offset the clients' wages, federal salary and social security benefits. When the clients tried to negotiate with Treasury by themselves, they were offered an unaffordable repayment plan which would have caused severe financial hardship. Clients subsequently hired the Firm to litigate an Appeals Petition before the SBA Office & Hearings Appeals (OHA) challenging the legal enforceability and amount of the debt. The Firm successfully negotiated a term OIC that was approved by the SBA Office of General Counsel, saving the clients approximately $205,000.
Clients' 7(a) loan was referred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for enforced collection in 2015. They not only personally guaranteed the loan, but also pledged their primary residence as additional collateral. One of the clients filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy thinking that it would discharge the SBA 7(a) lien encumbering their home. They later discovered that they were mistakenly advised. The Firm was subsequently hired to review their case and defend against a series of collection actions. Eventually, we were able to negotiate a structured workout for $180,000 directly with the SBA, saving them approximately $250,000 (by reducing the default interest rate and removing Treasury's substantial collection fees) and from possible foreclosure.
.jpg)
