Explore COVID-19 relief programs for small businesses with Protect Law Group. Discover how PPP and EIDL can support your recovery—get help today!
Book a Consultation CallThe COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted small businesses across the nation, leading to unprecedented challenges and financial hardships. To combat these issues, the federal government introduced various relief programs aimed at providing financial assistance to eligible businesses.
Protect Law Group will delve into key SBA programs related to pandemic relief, focusing on the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans and Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL). By understanding these business debt relief resources, small business owners can navigate recovery more effectively.
As of late 2023, various updates and adjustments have been made to both PPP and EIDL programs to reflect the evolving landscape of economic recovery. Small business owners should stay informed about any new guidelines or extensions offered by the SBA, as these can significantly impact their ability to access business debt relief.
The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) was designed to help small businesses maintain their workforce during the COVID-19 crisis. By offering forgivable loans to cover payroll expenses, the program aimed to ensure employees remained on the job. Businesses could apply for loans amounting to 2.5 times their average monthly payroll costs, which significantly aided companies struggling to pay their staff during lockdowns and reduced operations. SBA loan lawyers were able to make a profound difference for their clients.
Eligibility for PPP loans was broad, but specific criteria had to be met. Small businesses with fewer than 500 employees, self-employed individuals, and certain non-profits were eligible to apply. It's essential to note that applicants needed to demonstrate that the pandemic negatively affected their business operations, reinforcing the loan's intended purpose of providing much-needed support during tough times.
One of the standout features of PPP loans was their potential for forgiveness. To have their loans forgiven, businesses needed to use at least 60% of funds for payroll costs, while the remaining 40% could cover rent, utilities, and mortgage interest. By following proper procedures and maintaining employee retention, businesses could effectively turn their loans into grants, greatly alleviating financial burdens.
In addition to PPP loans, the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program served as another crucial resource for small business debt relief during the pandemic. EIDLs were designed to provide working capital to cover operational expenses and help businesses regain their financial footing. These low-interest loans became vital for businesses struggling to meet their financial obligations due to pandemic-related disruptions.
To qualify for EIDLs, businesses had to demonstrate substantial economic injury caused by the pandemic, which could include reduced revenue and increased expenses. The application process required businesses to provide essential financial information, including profit and loss statements. As a result, understanding the necessary documentation upfront helped expedite the application process. SBA loan lawyers can help businesses navigate this paperwork.
By leveraging these resources, business owners can better navigate recovery and adapt to a post-pandemic world. Staying informed about current business debt relief is crucial for long-term success, and small business owners should continue to explore their options as they seek to regain stability and growth. Contact Protect Law Group for more detailed information and guidance.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Small business sole proprietor obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $500,000. Client defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for aggressive collection. Treasury added $180,000 in collection fees totaling $680,000+. Client tried to negotiate with Treasury but was only offered a 3-year or 10-year repayment plan. Client hired the Firm to represent before the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery and reviewing them, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury citing a host of purported violations. The Firm was able to negotiate a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, participation in the Hardship Accommodation Plan, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.
Small business and guarantors obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $1,000,000. Clients defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for collection. Treasury added nearly $500,000 in collection fees totaling $1,500,000. Clients were served with the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice and exercised the Repayment option by applying for the SBA’s Hardship Accommodation Plan. However, their application was summarily rejected by the SBA without providing any meaningful reasons. Clients hired the Firm to represent them against the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury. During litigation and before the OHA court issued a final Decision and Order, the Firm successfully negotiated a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, a modification of the original repayment terms, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.
.jpg)
