SBA Loan Defaults and Franchises
We will analyze your SBA loan problems and advise you on potential solutions such as an SBA offer in compromise for your SBA loan default.
Dispute Credit Report
As part of your annual to do list, obtain a copy of your credit report to check for negative credit marks. If you obtained an SBA loan or signed as a personal guarantor on an SBA loan and the loan went into default, the SBA may report the default on your credit report. To that end, federal law authorizes the SBA to report such defaulted debt to credit reporting agencies. Experian, TransUnion and Equifax comprise the three main credit reporting agencies.
A defaulted loan will negatively affect your credit score, make lenders unlikely to lend to you for purchases such as a car or house or it will make those purchases much more expensive in the form of a higher interest rate.
In certain circumstances, you can force the removal of a negative credit mark. However, you need to prove that the defaulted debt must be removed. For instance, common reasons for removal of a negative credit reporting include the following:
In any case, you must obtain and provide evidence that shows why the negative credit reporting should be removed. Simply writing a letter asking the credit reporting agencies to re-investigate fails in accomplishing your goal more often than not.
Again, simply writing a letter to the credit reporting agencies is not likely to accomplish much. An effective letter includes evidence and explains why the evidence exonerates you and dictates removal of the debt on your credit report.
Unfortunately, telephone disputes fail to create an adequate record for future use. Moreover, although federal law requires the nationwide credit reporting agencies to maintain a toll-free number for consumers, telephone access is not always consistent. Equifax, TransUnion and Experian paid a total of $2.5 million to settle charges by the FTC that they failed to meet legal requirements for telephone access.
Moreover, internet disputes make a dubious remedy as well. When a consumer makes a dispute through a nationwide credit reporting agency website, the website confides consumers to a "check-box" dispute form. This provides the credit reporting agencies with defenses premised on the lack of detail in a dispute. Furthermore, online disputes make documentation of your disputed file difficult.
In addition to including your evidence, your written dispute needs to be clear, complete and unambiguous. Furthermore, suggest steps for the re-investigation. Lastly, your steps should be aligned with federal law and federal regulations.
If the SBA or the credit reporting agencies refuse to remove the debt, you may still have rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and other laws and may be able to pursue litigation. Contact a local attorney familiar with this type of law. You have the ability to file a complaint with the government and ask the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to investigate on your behalf, as well.
Our experienced, federally authorized attorneys will aggressively pursue your rights. Protect Law Group takes a systematic, proven approach to your credit report issues regarding SBA loans. Protect Law Group first investigates your claim and determines whether grounds exist to dispute your credit report. If our investigation reveals evidence that exonerates you from the debt or requires removal of the negative credit mark, our skilled attorneys will draft your re-investigation letter with applicable documentation and evidence. Lastly, if the credit reporting agencies, SBA or other federal agency refuse to remove the negative credit mark in light of the evidence, our attorneys will draft a complaint to be filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on your behalf.
Call our office today at 833-428-0937 and schedule your free initial case evaluation. Feel free to contact us via our website as well - www.sba-attorneys.com.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
The clients are personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan. The SBA referred the debt to the Department of Treasury, which was seeking payment of $487,981 from our clients. We initially filed a Cross-Servicing Dispute, which was denied. As a result, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals asserting legal defenses and supporting evidence uncovered during the discovery and investigation phase of our services. Ultimately, the SBA settled the debt for $25,000 - saving our clients approximately $462,981.
Clients executed several trust deeds pledging seven (7) real estate properties and unconditional personal guarantees for an SBA 7(a) loan from the participating lender. The clients' small business failed and eventually defaulted on repayment of the loan exposing all collateral pledged by the clients. The SBA subsequently acquired the loan balance from the lender, including the right to liquidate and collect all pledged collateral pursuant to the trust deed instruments.
The Firm was hired to negotiate separate release of lien proposals for all 7 real estate properties. In preparation for the work assignment, the Firm Attorneys initiated discovery to secure records from the SBA and Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service. After reviewing the records and understanding the interplay between the lender and the SBA, the attorneys then prepared, submitted and negotiated the release of lien (ROL) for each of the 7 real estate properties for consideration.
After submitting the proposals, the assigned SBA Loan Specialists approved each ROL package - significantly reducing the total SBA debt claimed.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000. He and his wife signed personal guarantees and pledged their home as collateral. The SBA loan went into default, the term or maturity date was accelerated and demand for payment of the entire amount claimed was made. The SBA lender’s note gave it the right to adjust the default interest rate from 7.25% to 18% per annum. The business filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy but was dismissed after 3 years due to its inability to continue with payments under the plan. Clients wanted to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which would have been a mistake as their home had significant equity to repay the SBA loan balance in full as the Trustee would likely seize and sell the home to repay the secured and unsecured creditors. However, the SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection to the SBA. Clients then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and hired the Firm to respond to it and negotiate on their behalf. Clients disputed the SBA’s alleged balance of $148,000, as several payments made to the SBA lender during the Chapter 11 reorganization were not accounted for. To challenge the SBA’s claimed debt balance, the Firm Attorneys initiated expedited discovery to obtain government records. SBA records disclosed the true amount owed was about $97,000. Moreover, because the Clients’ home had significant equity, they were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise or an immediate Release of Lien for Consideration, despite being incorrectly advised by non-attorney consulting companies that they were. Instead, our Firm Attorneys recommended a Workout of $97,000 spread over a lengthy term and a waiver of the applicable interest rate making the monthly payment affordable. After back and forth negotiations, SBA approved the Workout proposal, thereby saving the home from imminent foreclosure and reducing the Clients' liability by nearly $81,000 in incorrect principal balance, accrued interest, and statutory collection fees.
.jpg)
