How Do I Stop an Administrative Wage Garnishment?
Do you want to know more about how to stop an administrative wage garnishment but don't know where to start? Learn more here.
Dispute Credit Report
As part of your annual to do list, obtain a copy of your credit report to check for negative credit marks. If you obtained an SBA loan or signed as a personal guarantor on an SBA loan and the loan went into default, the SBA may report the default on your credit report. To that end, federal law authorizes the SBA to report such defaulted debt to credit reporting agencies. Experian, TransUnion and Equifax comprise the three main credit reporting agencies.
A defaulted loan will negatively affect your credit score, make lenders unlikely to lend to you for purchases such as a car or house or it will make those purchases much more expensive in the form of a higher interest rate.
In certain circumstances, you can force the removal of a negative credit mark. However, you need to prove that the defaulted debt must be removed. For instance, common reasons for removal of a negative credit reporting include the following:
In any case, you must obtain and provide evidence that shows why the negative credit reporting should be removed. Simply writing a letter asking the credit reporting agencies to re-investigate fails in accomplishing your goal more often than not.
Again, simply writing a letter to the credit reporting agencies is not likely to accomplish much. An effective letter includes evidence and explains why the evidence exonerates you and dictates removal of the debt on your credit report.
Unfortunately, telephone disputes fail to create an adequate record for future use. Moreover, although federal law requires the nationwide credit reporting agencies to maintain a toll-free number for consumers, telephone access is not always consistent. Equifax, TransUnion and Experian paid a total of $2.5 million to settle charges by the FTC that they failed to meet legal requirements for telephone access.
Moreover, internet disputes make a dubious remedy as well. When a consumer makes a dispute through a nationwide credit reporting agency website, the website confides consumers to a "check-box" dispute form. This provides the credit reporting agencies with defenses premised on the lack of detail in a dispute. Furthermore, online disputes make documentation of your disputed file difficult.
In addition to including your evidence, your written dispute needs to be clear, complete and unambiguous. Furthermore, suggest steps for the re-investigation. Lastly, your steps should be aligned with federal law and federal regulations.
If the SBA or the credit reporting agencies refuse to remove the debt, you may still have rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and other laws and may be able to pursue litigation. Contact a local attorney familiar with this type of law. You have the ability to file a complaint with the government and ask the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to investigate on your behalf, as well.
Our experienced, federally authorized attorneys will aggressively pursue your rights. Protect Law Group takes a systematic, proven approach to your credit report issues regarding SBA loans. Protect Law Group first investigates your claim and determines whether grounds exist to dispute your credit report. If our investigation reveals evidence that exonerates you from the debt or requires removal of the negative credit mark, our skilled attorneys will draft your re-investigation letter with applicable documentation and evidence. Lastly, if the credit reporting agencies, SBA or other federal agency refuse to remove the negative credit mark in light of the evidence, our attorneys will draft a complaint to be filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on your behalf.
Call our office today at 833-428-0937 and schedule your free initial case evaluation. Feel free to contact us via our website as well - www.sba-attorneys.com.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan for $100,000 from the lender. The SBA loan went into early default in 2006 less than 12 months from disbursement. The SBA paid the 7(a) guaranty monies to the lender and subsequently acquired the deficiency balance of about $96,000, including the right to collect against the guarantor. However, the SBA sent the Official 60-Day Due Process Notice to the Client's defunct business address instead of his personal residence, which he never received. As a result, the debt was transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service where substantial collection fees were assessed, including accrued interest per the promissory note. Treasury eventually referred the debt to a Private Collection Agency (PCA) - Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. Pioneer sent a demand letter claiming a debt balance of almost $310,000 - a shocking 223% increase from the original loan amount assigned to the SBA. Client's social security disability benefits were seized through the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). Client hired the Firm to represent him as the debt continued to snowball despite seizure of his social security benefits and federal tax refunds as the involuntary payments were first applied to Treasury's collection fees, then to accrued interest with minimal allocation to the SBA principal balance.
We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute (CSD) challenging the referral of the debt to Treasury based on the defective notice sent to the defunct business address. Despite overwhelming evidence proving a violation of the Client's Due Process rights, the SBA still rejected the CSD. As a result, an Appeals Petition was filed with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) Court challenging the SBA decision and its certification the debt was legally enforceable in the amount claimed. After several months of litigation before the SBA OHA Court, our Firm Attorney successfully negotiated an Offer in Compromise (OIC) Term Workout with the SBA Supervising Trial Attorney for $82,000 spread over a term of 74 months at a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Client an estimated $241,000 in Treasury collection fees, accrued interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)), and the PCA contingency fee.
Client's small business obtained an SBA COVID EIDL for $301,000 pledging collateral by executing the Note, Unconditional Guarantee and Security Agreement. The business defaulted on the loan and the SBA CESC called the Note and Guarantee, accelerated the principal balance due, accrued interest and retracted the 30-year term schedule.
The loan was transferred to the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service which resulted in the statutory addition of $90,000+ in administrative fees, costs, penalties and interest with the total debt now at $391.000+. Treasury also initiated a Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against the client's federal contractor payments for the full amount each month - intercepting all of its revenue and pushing the business to the brink of bankruptcy.
The Firm was hired to investigate and find an alternate solution to the bankruptcy option. After submitting formal production requests for all government records, it was discovered that the SBA failed to send the required Official 60-Day Pre-Referral Notice to the borrower and guarantor prior to referring the debt to Treasury. This procedural due process violation served as the basis to submit a Cross-Servicing Dispute to recall the debt from Treasury back to the SBA and to negotiate a reinstatement of the original 30-year maturity date, a modified workout, cessation of the TOP levy against the federal contractor payments and removal of the $90,000+ Treasury-based collection fees, interest and penalties.
Clients executed personal and corporate guarantees for an SBA 7(a) loan from a Preferred Lender Provider (PLP). The borrower corporation defaulted on the loan exposing all collateral pledged by the Clients. The SBA subsequently acquired the loan balance from the PLP, including the right to collect against all guarantors. The SBA sent the Official Pre-Referral Notice to the guarantors giving them sixty (60) days to either pay the outstanding balance in full, negotiate a Repayment (Offer in Compromise (OIC) or Structured Workout (SW)), challenge their alleged guarantor liability or file a Request for Hearing (Appeals Petition) with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals.
Because the Clients were not financially eligible for an OIC, they opted for Structured Workout negotiations directly with the SBA before the debt was transferred to the Bureau of Fiscal Service, a division of the U.S. Department of Treasury for enforced collection.
The Firm was hired to negotiate a global Workout Agreement directly with the SBA to resolve the personal and corporate guarantees. After submitting the Structured Workout proposal, the assigned SBA Loan Specialist approved the requested terms in under ten (10) days without any lengthy back and forth negotiations.
The favorable terms of the Workout included an extended maturity at an affordable principal amount, along with a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Clients approximately $181,000 in administrative fees, penalties and interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)) as authorized by 31 U.S.C. § 3717(e) had the SBA loan been transferred to BFS.
.jpg)
