The federal government can garnish up to 15% of your paycheck without first obtaining a civil court judgment. This can strike at the heart of your finances.
Book a Consultation CallThis percentage may seem modest, but it can accumulate quickly, especially for those living paycheck to paycheck. The administrative wage garnishment process allows the government to take a portion of your paycheck without first obtaining a civil court judgment. As such, the SBA or other creditor agencies must give you notice thirty days in advance and an opportunity to request a hearing or negotiate a payment plan. Courts have interpreted the six-year statute of limitations for actions for monetary damages as applicable only to lawsuits filed in court. It does not apply to non-judicial collection methods, such as administrative wage garnishment.
Administrative wage garnishment can hamper your finances. Unless you agree in writing to a higher amount, the government can garnish your disposable pay up to 15%. It's crucial to understand that “disposable pay” is calculated after mandatory deductions, so knowing your deductions can help you estimate the true impact of garnishment. Federal law also limits total garnishments to 25% of disposable pay. Therefore, if you have other garnishments, the total of all garnishments, including the federal government, cannot exceed 25%.
"Disposable pay" means your pay after the deduction of health insurance premiums and any amount required by law to be withheld. Such amounts include Social Security taxes, withholding taxes, Medicare, etc. Therefore, if you had a previous garnishment of 15% in place and then the government obtained an administrative wage garnishment order against you, the administrative wage garnishment would be limited to an additional 10% of your income. Taking 15% of your paycheck can really affect your ability to pay your bills, raise your kids, and save for retirement. Many individuals do not realize that even small garnishments can drastically impact your budgeting and future financial goals, making it imperative to take action if you receive notice of garnishment.
As soon as you receive the notice of intended administrative wage garnishment, you must request a hearing. Alternatively, you can contact the Treasury and arrange for a payment plan. If you request a hearing timely, an administrative wage garnishment cannot start until you've had a chance to present your case. Be proactive; it’s essential to keep records of all communications and ensure prompt submission of your hearing request to avoid complications. If you fail to submit a hearing request promptly, the administrative wage garnishment will start.
Going forward, you may present evidence that you don't owe the debt, the debt is not enforceable, or the amount of the debt is incorrect. Also, you may present evidence that an administrative wage garnishment would cause financial hardship if implemented. Lastly, if you were involuntarily terminated from your previous job and have been currently employed for less than 12 months, a wage garnishment cannot proceed. It’s advised to gather any documentation that supports your claims, as this information will be crucial for your defense.
You will need to file a brief with facts, evidence, and legal support for your position, as well as financials if you claim financial hardship. To that end, our assertive attorneys have represented clients all over the country in administrative wage garnishment hearings. Protect Law Group has the experience obtaining the necessary evidence and presenting your defenses. With the right legal representation, you can navigate this challenging situation more effectively and work toward a favorable resolution.
Contact our office today and one of our attorneys will discuss your matter with you at no cost.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Clients personally guaranteed an SBA 504 loan balance of $337,000. The Third Party Lender had obtained a Judgment against the clients. We represented clients before the SBA and negotiated an SBA OIC that was accepted for $30,000.
Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan to help with a relative’s new business venture. After the business failed, Treasury was able to secure a recurring Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against his monthly Social Security Benefits based on the claim that he owed over $1.2 million dollars. We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute, but then, prepared and filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals (SBA OHA). As a result of our efforts, we were able to convince the SBA to not only terminate the claimed debt of $1.2 million dollars against our client (without him having to file bankruptcy) but also refund the past recurring amounts that were offset from his Social Security Benefits in connection with the TOP levy.
Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for their small business in the amount of $298,000. They pledged their primary residence and personal guarantees as direct collateral for the loan. The business failed, the lender was paid the 7(a) guaranty money and the debt was assigned to the SBA. Clients received the Official 60-Day Notice giving them a couple of options to resolve the debt balance directly with the SBA before referral to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service. The risk of referral to Treasury would add nearly $95,000 to the SBA principal loan balance. With the default interest rate at 7.5%, the amount of money to pay toward interest was projected at $198,600. Clients hired the Firm with only 4 days left to respond to the 60-Day due process notice. Because the clients were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) due to the significant equity in their home and the SBA lien encumbering it, the Firm Attorneys proposed a Structured Workout to resolve the SBA debt. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist assigned to the case approved the Workout terms which prevented potential foreclosure of their home, but also saved the clients approximately $294,000 over the agreed-upon Workout term with a waiver of all contractual and statutory administrative fees, collection costs, penalties, and interest.
.jpg)
