COVID-19 Relief Fraud: PPP & EIDL Loans Under Heightened Investigation & Prosecution Contact us today.
Book a Consultation CallDerrick Worrell, 48, pleaded guilty to charges of money laundering and organizing a scheme to defraud $50,000 or more in connection with certain SBA COVID Loans authorized for disbursement under the CARES Act.
Mr. Worrell was imposed a mitigated sentence of 10 years, which could be reduced to under 6 years if Worrell complies with the terms of his plea agreement. To qualify for the reduced sentence, Worrell has been ordered to turn himself in to the court to avoid any further legal violations.
Worrell was among 6 individuals arrested for allegedly stealing over $3 million from the SBA COVID-19 Loan Program, enacted in 2020 under the CARES Act – which was designed to provide economic relief to small businesses actually affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
During the course of investigation, it was discovered that Worrell secured an SBA COVID Loan disbursed in the amount of $491,000 for his company with 26 employees and a monthly payroll of $184,000. Worrell also paid $52,000 in wages, taxes and payroll fees while using the remainder of the SBA COVID Loan for his own personal expenses - approximately $254,000 or 52% of the loan, which included rental cars, groceries, and online shopping – all of which were apparently flagged as misuse of COVID relief funds.
Understand Your Risk
This case serves as a reminder of the severe consequences of exploiting the COVID PPP & EIDL Loan Program.
With the recent uptick by the SBA of conducting COVID PPP & EIDL non-compliance audits and business closure reviews where borrowers are required to produce financial statements, tax returns, bank and credit card statements in response to an Information Document Request, there is a paper trail and treasure trove of information that could be used against you and land you in trouble if allegations of ineligibility, false certification and/or misuse of proceeds can be proven.
If you obtained COVID PPP or EIDL funds for your small business and think you could find yourself in the crosshairs of an investigation and potential prosecution of false certification, misuse of proceeds or other financial mischief, then you should consult with qualified legal counsel to help assess your situation.
Government authorities have been encouraging the public to report suspicious activity related to pandemic relief funds, and with the extended 10-year statute of limitations to investigate COVID PPP & EIDL Loan fraud, there is ample time for enhanced scrutiny and possible prosecution ranging from civil penalties to criminal allegations.
Establishing a robust compliance strategy is crucial in preparing for an SBA non-compliance audits or business closure reviews. Begin by reviewing your business practices against SBA guidelines to pinpoint any potential areas of non-compliance. Regular internal audits can help you identify and rectify discrepancies before they become problematic. Furthermore, consulting with professionals specializing in SBA loans can provide insights into maintaining compliant financial records. Remember, being proactive in compliance can significantly mitigate risks during an audit or investigation.
Strategies
Engaging legal counsel experienced in SBA regulations should be a priority if faced with an SBA non-compliance audits or business closure reviews. An attorney can help you navigate the complexities of the non-compliance audit or business closure review process, advise on your legal rights, and represent your interests. They can also assist in developing a strategy for responding to inquiries and defending against potential findings of non-compliance. Moreover, if the non-compliance audits or business closure reviews reveal significant issues, your attorney can guide you through the steps for pursuing options.
Navigating an SBA non-compliance audit or business closure review doesn't have to be an overwhelming ordeal. By understanding the process, prioritizing compliance, enlisting legal support, and taking action post-audit, you can mitigate the impacts of such scrutiny on your business or you - as a owner/officer. If you're facing an SBA audit or have concerns about your business's compliance with SBA regulations, contact Protect Law Group today. Our team is dedicated to guiding small business owners through financial challenges and ensuring their rights are protected.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan for $350,000. The small business failed but because of the personal guarantee liability, the client continued to pay the monthly principal & interest out-of-pocket draining his savings. The client hired a local attorney but quickly realized that he was not familiar with SBA-backed loans or their standard operating procedures. Our firm was subsequently hired after the client received the SBA's official 60-day notice. After back-and-forth negotiations, we were able to convince the SBA to reinstate the loan, retract the acceleration of the outstanding balance, modify the original terms, and approve a structured workout reducing the interest rate from 7.75% to 0% and extending the maturity date for a longer period to make the monthly payments affordable. In conclusion, not only we were able to help the client avoid litigation and bankruptcy, but our SBA lawyers also saved him approximately $227,945 over the term of the workout.
Client received the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice for a loan that was obtained by her small business in 2001. The SBA loan went into default in 2004 but after hearing nothing from the SBA lender or the SBA for 20 years, out of the blue, she received the SBA's collection due process notice which provided her with only one of four options: (1) repay the entire accelerated balance immediately; (2) negotiate a repayment arrangement; (3) challenge the legal enforceability of the debt with evidence; or (4) request an OHA hearing before a U.S. Administrative Law Judge.
Client hired the Firm to represent her with only 13 days left before the expiration deadline to respond to the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice. The Firm attorneys immediately researched the SBA's Official loan database to obtain information regarding the 7(a) loan. Thereafter, the Firm attorneys conducted legal research and asserted certain affirmative defenses challenging the legal enforceability of the debt. A written response was timely filed to the 60-Day Notice with the SBA subsequently agreeing with the client's affirmative defenses and legal arguments. As a result, the SBA rendered a decision immediately terminating collection of the debt against the client's alleged personal guarantee liability saving her $50,000.
Small business and guarantors obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $1,000,000. Clients defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for collection. Treasury added nearly $500,000 in collection fees totaling $1,500,000. Clients were served with the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice and exercised the Repayment option by applying for the SBA’s Hardship Accommodation Plan. However, their application was summarily rejected by the SBA without providing any meaningful reasons. Clients hired the Firm to represent them against the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury. During litigation and before the OHA court issued a final Decision and Order, the Firm successfully negotiated a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, a modification of the original repayment terms, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.
.jpg)
