COVID-19 Relief Fraud: PPP & EIDL Loans Under Heightened Investigation & Prosecution Contact us today.
Book a Consultation CallDerrick Worrell, 48, pleaded guilty to charges of money laundering and organizing a scheme to defraud $50,000 or more in connection with certain SBA COVID Loans authorized for disbursement under the CARES Act.
Mr. Worrell was imposed a mitigated sentence of 10 years, which could be reduced to under 6 years if Worrell complies with the terms of his plea agreement. To qualify for the reduced sentence, Worrell has been ordered to turn himself in to the court to avoid any further legal violations.
Worrell was among 6 individuals arrested for allegedly stealing over $3 million from the SBA COVID-19 Loan Program, enacted in 2020 under the CARES Act – which was designed to provide economic relief to small businesses actually affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
During the course of investigation, it was discovered that Worrell secured an SBA COVID Loan disbursed in the amount of $491,000 for his company with 26 employees and a monthly payroll of $184,000. Worrell also paid $52,000 in wages, taxes and payroll fees while using the remainder of the SBA COVID Loan for his own personal expenses - approximately $254,000 or 52% of the loan, which included rental cars, groceries, and online shopping – all of which were apparently flagged as misuse of COVID relief funds.
Understand Your Risk
This case serves as a reminder of the severe consequences of exploiting the COVID PPP & EIDL Loan Program.
With the recent uptick by the SBA of conducting COVID PPP & EIDL non-compliance audits and business closure reviews where borrowers are required to produce financial statements, tax returns, bank and credit card statements in response to an Information Document Request, there is a paper trail and treasure trove of information that could be used against you and land you in trouble if allegations of ineligibility, false certification and/or misuse of proceeds can be proven.
If you obtained COVID PPP or EIDL funds for your small business and think you could find yourself in the crosshairs of an investigation and potential prosecution of false certification, misuse of proceeds or other financial mischief, then you should consult with qualified legal counsel to help assess your situation.
Government authorities have been encouraging the public to report suspicious activity related to pandemic relief funds, and with the extended 10-year statute of limitations to investigate COVID PPP & EIDL Loan fraud, there is ample time for enhanced scrutiny and possible prosecution ranging from civil penalties to criminal allegations.
Establishing a robust compliance strategy is crucial in preparing for an SBA non-compliance audits or business closure reviews. Begin by reviewing your business practices against SBA guidelines to pinpoint any potential areas of non-compliance. Regular internal audits can help you identify and rectify discrepancies before they become problematic. Furthermore, consulting with professionals specializing in SBA loans can provide insights into maintaining compliant financial records. Remember, being proactive in compliance can significantly mitigate risks during an audit or investigation.
Strategies
Engaging legal counsel experienced in SBA regulations should be a priority if faced with an SBA non-compliance audits or business closure reviews. An attorney can help you navigate the complexities of the non-compliance audit or business closure review process, advise on your legal rights, and represent your interests. They can also assist in developing a strategy for responding to inquiries and defending against potential findings of non-compliance. Moreover, if the non-compliance audits or business closure reviews reveal significant issues, your attorney can guide you through the steps for pursuing options.
Navigating an SBA non-compliance audit or business closure review doesn't have to be an overwhelming ordeal. By understanding the process, prioritizing compliance, enlisting legal support, and taking action post-audit, you can mitigate the impacts of such scrutiny on your business or you - as a owner/officer. If you're facing an SBA audit or have concerns about your business's compliance with SBA regulations, contact Protect Law Group today. Our team is dedicated to guiding small business owners through financial challenges and ensuring their rights are protected.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.
Clients personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan that was referred to the Department of Treasury for collection. Treasury claimed our clients owed over $220,000 once it added its statutory collection fees and interest. We were able to negotiate a significant reduction of the total claimed amount from $220,000 to $119,000, saving the clients over $100,000 by arguing for a waiver of the statutory 28%-30% administrative fees and costs.
Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan balance of $58,000. The client received a notice of Intent to initiate Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG) Proceedings. We represented the client at the hearing and successfully defeated the AWG Order based on several legal and equitable grounds.
.jpg)
