SBA COVID Loan Crackdown: What Small Business Borrowers and Guarantors Need to Know in the Kelly Loeffler Era
Book a Consultation CallWithin hours of taking the oath of office, SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler circulated a “Day One Memo” pledging to rebuild the agency around an America-First agenda and to impose a zero-tolerance policy for fraud, waste and abuse in every loan program. The memo orders an immediate restart of dormant collections, the creation of a Fraud Working Group, and the appointment of a“Fraud Czar” to claw back pandemic-era losses.
Congress gave the Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA) sharp new teeth in the FY 2025 National Defense Authorization Act. Under the amendments:
Bottom line: the AFCA lets the SBA investigate and punish misconduct quickly and at lower cost while still inflicting painful financial consequences on small business borrowers, owners, officers and guarantors of COVID loans.
Hearing & Decision – After discovery and an evidentiary hearing,the presiding ALJ issues findings in a Decision and Order – which can involve the imposition of penalties or dismisses the case. Appeals go to the SBA Administrator and then to the Federal D.C. Circuit pursuant to rights and remedies under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
Each scenario now falls squarely within the AFCA’s scope and can be charged administratively and litigated in the SBA OHA Court before a presiding U.S. Administrative Law Judge (ALJ).
Pending legislation in the Senate, the Complete COVID Collections Act (S. 68), if passed by Congress, would prohibit any pause in collections on delinquent PPP, EIDL or 7(a) loans, compel monthly progress briefings to Congress, and extend the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery’s jurisdiction to SBA programs through 2030. If the bill passes, borrowers and guarantors can expect faster Treasury collection action, more subpoenas and far fewer chances to negotiate voluntary cures.
Under SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler and a Trump Justice Department that views pandemic fraud as low-hanging fruit, small-dollar COVID loan misconduct is now a front line enforcement priority. The AFCA’s streamlined process, combined with an impending statutory ban on collection pauses, means SBA borrowers, owners, officers and guarantors can face unprecedented exposure—even for paperwork filed years ago.
If you believe your SBA COVID PPP or EIDL loan could be targeted for enforced collection, business closure review, audit, investigation or an AFCA claim, contact us at SBA-Attorneys.com for a confidential Case Evaluation.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified SBA-Attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Clients personally guaranteed an SBA 504 loan balance of $337,000. The Third Party Lender had obtained a Judgment against the clients. We represented clients before the SBA and negotiated an SBA OIC that was accepted for $30,000.
The client personally guaranteed an SBA 504 loan balance of $375,000. Debt had been cross-referred to the Treasury at the time we got involved with the case. We successfully had debt recalled to the SBA where we then presented an SBA OIC that was accepted for $58,000.
Clients personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan that was referred to the Department of Treasury for collection. Treasury claimed our clients owed over $220,000 once it added its statutory collection fees and interest. We were able to negotiate a significant reduction of the total claimed amount from $220,000 to $119,000, saving the clients over $100,000 by arguing for a waiver of the statutory 28%-30% administrative fees and costs.