SBA COVID Loan Crackdown: What Small Business Borrowers and Guarantors Need to Know in the Kelly Loeffler Era
Book a Consultation CallWithin hours of taking the oath of office, SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler circulated a “Day One Memo” pledging to rebuild the agency around an America-First agenda and to impose a zero-tolerance policy for fraud, waste and abuse in every loan program. The memo orders an immediate restart of dormant collections, the creation of a Fraud Working Group, and the appointment of a“Fraud Czar” to claw back pandemic-era losses.
Congress gave the Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA) sharp new teeth in the FY 2025 National Defense Authorization Act. Under the amendments:
Bottom line: the AFCA lets the SBA investigate and punish misconduct quickly and at lower cost while still inflicting painful financial consequences on small business borrowers, owners, officers and guarantors of COVID loans.
Hearing & Decision – After discovery and an evidentiary hearing,the presiding ALJ issues findings in a Decision and Order – which can involve the imposition of penalties or dismisses the case. Appeals go to the SBA Administrator and then to the Federal D.C. Circuit pursuant to rights and remedies under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
Each scenario now falls squarely within the AFCA’s scope and can be charged administratively and litigated in the SBA OHA Court before a presiding U.S. Administrative Law Judge (ALJ).
Pending legislation in the Senate, the Complete COVID Collections Act (S. 68), if passed by Congress, would prohibit any pause in collections on delinquent PPP, EIDL or 7(a) loans, compel monthly progress briefings to Congress, and extend the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery’s jurisdiction to SBA programs through 2030. If the bill passes, borrowers and guarantors can expect faster Treasury collection action, more subpoenas and far fewer chances to negotiate voluntary cures.
Under SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler and a Trump Justice Department that views pandemic fraud as low-hanging fruit, small-dollar COVID loan misconduct is now a front line enforcement priority. The AFCA’s streamlined process, combined with an impending statutory ban on collection pauses, means SBA borrowers, owners, officers and guarantors can face unprecedented exposure—even for paperwork filed years ago.
If you believe your SBA COVID PPP or EIDL loan could be targeted for enforced collection, business closure review, audit, investigation or an AFCA claim, contact us at SBA-Attorneys.com for a confidential Case Evaluation.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified SBA-Attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000. He and his wife signed personal guarantees and pledged their home as collateral. The SBA loan went into default, the term or maturity date was accelerated and demand for payment of the entire amount claimed was made. The SBA lender’s note gave it the right to adjust the default interest rate from 7.25% to 18% per annum. The business filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy but was dismissed after 3 years due to its inability to continue with payments under the plan. Clients wanted to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which would have been a mistake as their home had significant equity to repay the SBA loan balance in full as the Trustee would likely seize and sell the home to repay the secured and unsecured creditors. However, the SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection to the SBA. Clients then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and hired the Firm to respond to it and negotiate on their behalf. Clients disputed the SBA’s alleged balance of $148,000, as several payments made to the SBA lender during the Chapter 11 reorganization were not accounted for. To challenge the SBA’s claimed debt balance, the Firm Attorneys initiated expedited discovery to obtain government records. SBA records disclosed the true amount owed was about $97,000. Moreover, because the Clients’ home had significant equity, they were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise or an immediate Release of Lien for Consideration, despite being incorrectly advised by non-attorney consulting companies that they were. Instead, our Firm Attorneys recommended a Workout of $97,000 spread over a lengthy term and a waiver of the applicable interest rate making the monthly payment affordable. After back and forth negotiations, SBA approved the Workout proposal, thereby saving the home from imminent foreclosure and reducing the Clients' liability by nearly $81,000 in incorrect principal balance, accrued interest, and statutory collection fees.
Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan balance of over $150,000. Business failed and eventually shut down. SBA then pursued client for the balance. We intervened and was able to present an SBA OIC that was accepted for $30,000.
The clients are personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan. The SBA referred the debt to the Department of Treasury, which was seeking payment of $487,981 from our clients. We initially filed a Cross-Servicing Dispute, which was denied. As a result, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals asserting legal defenses and supporting evidence uncovered during the discovery and investigation phase of our services. Ultimately, the SBA settled the debt for $25,000 - saving our clients approximately $462,981.
.jpg)
