SBA COVID Loan Crackdown: What Small Business Borrowers and Guarantors Need to Know in the Kelly Loeffler Era
Book a Consultation CallWithin hours of taking the oath of office, SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler circulated a “Day One Memo” pledging to rebuild the agency around an America-First agenda and to impose a zero-tolerance policy for fraud, waste and abuse in every loan program. The memo orders an immediate restart of dormant collections, the creation of a Fraud Working Group, and the appointment of a“Fraud Czar” to claw back pandemic-era losses.
Congress gave the Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA) sharp new teeth in the FY 2025 National Defense Authorization Act. Under the amendments:
Bottom line: the AFCA lets the SBA investigate and punish misconduct quickly and at lower cost while still inflicting painful financial consequences on small business borrowers, owners, officers and guarantors of COVID loans.
Hearing & Decision – After discovery and an evidentiary hearing,the presiding ALJ issues findings in a Decision and Order – which can involve the imposition of penalties or dismisses the case. Appeals go to the SBA Administrator and then to the Federal D.C. Circuit pursuant to rights and remedies under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
Each scenario now falls squarely within the AFCA’s scope and can be charged administratively and litigated in the SBA OHA Court before a presiding U.S. Administrative Law Judge (ALJ).
Pending legislation in the Senate, the Complete COVID Collections Act (S. 68), if passed by Congress, would prohibit any pause in collections on delinquent PPP, EIDL or 7(a) loans, compel monthly progress briefings to Congress, and extend the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery’s jurisdiction to SBA programs through 2030. If the bill passes, borrowers and guarantors can expect faster Treasury collection action, more subpoenas and far fewer chances to negotiate voluntary cures.
Under SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler and a Trump Justice Department that views pandemic fraud as low-hanging fruit, small-dollar COVID loan misconduct is now a front line enforcement priority. The AFCA’s streamlined process, combined with an impending statutory ban on collection pauses, means SBA borrowers, owners, officers and guarantors can face unprecedented exposure—even for paperwork filed years ago.
If you believe your SBA COVID PPP or EIDL loan could be targeted for enforced collection, business closure review, audit, investigation or an AFCA claim, contact us at SBA-Attorneys.com for a confidential Case Evaluation.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified SBA-Attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.

Client received the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice for a loan that was obtained by her small business in 2001. The SBA loan went into default in 2004 but after hearing nothing from the SBA lender or the SBA for 20 years, out of the blue, she received the SBA's collection due process notice which provided her with only one of four options: (1) repay the entire accelerated balance immediately; (2) negotiate a repayment arrangement; (3) challenge the legal enforceability of the debt with evidence; or (4) request an OHA hearing before a U.S. Administrative Law Judge.
Client hired the Firm to represent her with only 13 days left before the expiration deadline to respond to the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice. The Firm attorneys immediately researched the SBA's Official loan database to obtain information regarding the 7(a) loan. Thereafter, the Firm attorneys conducted legal research and asserted certain affirmative defenses challenging the legal enforceability of the debt. A written response was timely filed to the 60-Day Notice with the SBA subsequently agreeing with the client's affirmative defenses and legal arguments. As a result, the SBA rendered a decision immediately terminating collection of the debt against the client's alleged personal guarantee liability saving her $50,000.

Clients personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan that was referred to the Department of Treasury for collection. Treasury claimed our clients owed over $220,000 once it added its statutory collection fees and interest. We were able to negotiate a significant reduction of the total claimed amount from $220,000 to $119,000, saving the clients over $100,000 by arguing for a waiver of the statutory 28%-30% administrative fees and costs.

Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan for $350,000. The small business failed but because of the personal guarantee liability, the client continued to pay the monthly principal & interest out-of-pocket draining his savings. The client hired a local attorney but quickly realized that he was not familiar with SBA-backed loans or their standard operating procedures. Our firm was subsequently hired after the client received the SBA's official 60-day notice. After back-and-forth negotiations, we were able to convince the SBA to reinstate the loan, retract the acceleration of the outstanding balance, modify the original terms, and approve a structured workout reducing the interest rate from 7.75% to 0% and extending the maturity date for a longer period to make the monthly payments affordable. In conclusion, not only we were able to help the client avoid litigation and bankruptcy, but our SBA lawyers also saved him approximately $227,945 over the term of the workout.