SBA COVID-19 PPP and EIDL Loans: SBA Ramps Up Audits and Investigations
Book a Consultation Call
On August 5, 2025, federal prosecutors unsealed an indictment charging small business owner, Jabari Kadar Long, with conspiracy, wire fraud affecting a financial institution, and money laundering tied to fraudulent Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL)applications. Authorities allege Long and unnamed co-conspirators siphoned more than $3 million in COVID-relief funds by inflating payroll figures and the number of employees for his small business, “Priceless Preservations Construction.” Source:(Department of Justice)
The defendant is presumed innocent, yet his case adds to a growing wave of COVID-relief prosecutions—and a clear message from the Department of Justice (DOJ) that it intends to investigate, find and prosecute fraudulent borrowers and guarantors well into 2026 and beyond.
Our seasoned SBA Attorneys blend white-collar defense experience with knowledge of Paycheck Protection Program compliance, COVID EIDL regulations, and SBA administrative procedures. Whether you face a COVID EIDL Business Closure Review, an OHA case, or need a proactive compliance check-up, we marshal document reviews, conduct legal research and outline settlement strategies to protect your business and personal assets.
The Long indictment shows that “self-certified” COVID-relief loans are under a microscope—and mistakes can morph into criminal accusations of SBA loan fraud. Don’t wait for an information document request, an FBI target letter or federal subpoena to get your house in order. Schedule a confidential strategy session with our SBA loan defense team today to safeguard the future you worked so hard to build.
If you receive a “business closure review,” “post-funding compliance review,” or any sudden SBA document request:
Contact experienced SBA loan defense attorney immediately.
Our SBA Attorneys have guided thousands of small businesses through reviews, contested or negotiated debts assessed against owners, officers and guarantors, and litigated cases at the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) Court before presiding Administrative Law Judges (ALJs).
Schedule a confidential strategy session today → keep your success story from becoming the next SBA nightmare tale. If you believe your SBA COVID PPP or EIDL loan could be targeted for enforced collection, business closure review, audit, investigation or an AFCA claim, contact us at SBA-Attorneys.com for a confidential Case Evaluation.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified SBA-Attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
The clients are personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan. The SBA referred the debt to the Department of Treasury, which was seeking payment of $487,981 from our clients. We initially filed a Cross-Servicing Dispute, which was denied. As a result, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals asserting legal defenses and supporting evidence uncovered during the discovery and investigation phase of our services. Ultimately, the SBA settled the debt for $25,000 - saving our clients approximately $462,981.
Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan to help with a relative’s new business venture. After the business failed, Treasury was able to secure a recurring Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against his monthly Social Security Benefits based on the claim that he owed over $1.2 million dollars. We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute, but then, prepared and filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals (SBA OHA). As a result of our efforts, we were able to convince the SBA to not only terminate the claimed debt of $1.2 million dollars against our client (without him having to file bankruptcy) but also refund the past recurring amounts that were offset from his Social Security Benefits in connection with the TOP levy.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.
.jpg)
