Defaulting on a SBA loan with the Trump Administration's reduction in SBA staff will impact your chances for resolution. Learn about the impact and how to protect yourself.
Book a Consultation Call
On March 21, 2025 the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) unveiled a sweeping agency-wide reorganization that will eliminate roughly 2,700 positions—about 43% of its workforce—returning headcount to pre-pandemic levels. SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler framed the cuts as a move to “do more with less” and refocus on the SBA’s core lending and disaster-relief missions (Small Business Administration).
Less than two months later, a federal judge in San Francisco issued a preliminary injunction pausing the broader Trump executive-branch down sizing plan, citing potential statutory overreach and noting that the SBA is on the list of agencies targeted for up-to-40 % layoffs (NPR).
For borrowers and guarantors already wrestling with COVID-EIDL, 7(a) or 504 obligations, this one-two punch of reorganization and litigation raises urgent questions: Will my loan servicing slow down? Will appeal rights change? What happens if my case is already at Treasury?
Change: 43% staff reduction
What SBA Says: Saves $435M/yr; trims “mission creep” (Small Business Administration)
What It Could Mean for You: Fewer case officers in servicing & OIC/Workout units; longer response times
Change: Centralized fraud & risk review
What SBA Says: Moves oversight to CFO’s office (Small Business Administration)
What It Could Mean for You: Higher scrutiny on eligibility, investigations/audits, enforcement & OIC/Workout proposals
Change: Disaster-loan servicing moved to new Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience
What SBA Says: Cross-trains field staff (Small Business Administration)
What It Could Mean for You: Possible reassignment of your case file and new points of contact
Change: Sunset of pandemic-era staff & programs
What SBA Says: Eliminates Community Navigator, DEI pilots, Green Lender Initiative (Small Business Administration)
What It Could Mean for You: Reduced outreach and counseling resources for distressed businesses
Scenario: COVID-EIDL borrower in default
Likely Effect: Potential backlog as staff positions are abolished or reassigned
Proactive Step: Submit settlement or hardship requests now before staffing changes take hold
Scenario: 7(a) or 504 under review in response to Official 60-Day Due Process Notice before referral to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service
Likely Effect: File reviews may slow; centralized risk unit may reopen closed matters
Proactive Step: Keep meticulous records & be prepared to respond to new document requests
Scenario: Repayment (i.e., Offer-in-Compromise (OIC) or Workout) pending
Likely Effect: Decision windows could lengthen unreasonably or summary denials and rejections may soon follow without a reasonable basis
Proactive Step: Request status updates in writing every 30 days; document prejudicial effect from delay; consider request for reconsideration if SBA issues summary denial or rejection
Scenario: FOIA/PA discovery and records inspection requests
Likely Effect: FOIA/PA queue historically understaffed; cuts may compound delay
Proactive Step: Request status updates every 30 days; if no progress, file OHA administrative appeal or engage in OGIS mediation to expedite or compel compliance
Scenario: OHA Appeals contesting referral to Treasury’s Bureau of Fiscal Service
Likely Effect: If SBA recall authority or staff is reduced, expect many more files to be referred to or remain at Treasury
Proactive Step: Consider SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) litigation for recall based on due process or APA violations and leverage negotiations or proceed with adjudication to a final Decision by the United States Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
At Protect Law Group, our Firm Attorneys are well-versed in SBA debt resolution, OHA litigation and Treasury AWG Hearing cases. We are already:
If you have a COVID-EIDL, 7(a), 504, Physical Disaster or PPP loan problem—or need to address a Treasury offset—contact us today for a Case Evaluation.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/23/business/economy/trump-small-business-administration.html
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified SBA-Attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Small business sole proprietor obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $500,000. Client defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for aggressive collection. Treasury added $180,000 in collection fees totaling $680,000+. Client tried to negotiate with Treasury but was only offered a 3-year or 10-year repayment plan. Client hired the Firm to represent before the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery and reviewing them, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury citing a host of purported violations. The Firm was able to negotiate a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, participation in the Hardship Accommodation Plan, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.
Small business and guarantors obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $1,000,000. Clients defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for collection. Treasury added nearly $500,000 in collection fees totaling $1,500,000. Clients were served with the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice and exercised the Repayment option by applying for the SBA’s Hardship Accommodation Plan. However, their application was summarily rejected by the SBA without providing any meaningful reasons. Clients hired the Firm to represent them against the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury. During litigation and before the OHA court issued a final Decision and Order, the Firm successfully negotiated a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, a modification of the original repayment terms, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.
Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan for $350,000. The small business failed but because of the personal guarantee liability, the client continued to pay the monthly principal & interest out-of-pocket draining his savings. The client hired a local attorney but quickly realized that he was not familiar with SBA-backed loans or their standard operating procedures. Our firm was subsequently hired after the client received the SBA's official 60-day notice. After back-and-forth negotiations, we were able to convince the SBA to reinstate the loan, retract the acceleration of the outstanding balance, modify the original terms, and approve a structured workout reducing the interest rate from 7.75% to 0% and extending the maturity date for a longer period to make the monthly payments affordable. In conclusion, not only we were able to help the client avoid litigation and bankruptcy, but our SBA lawyers also saved him approximately $227,945 over the term of the workout.
.jpg)
