Having a business attorney is definitely a great idea when the time comes, but when is that time? Check out this article to find out when is the perfect time you should consider hiring a small business attorney now!
Book a Consultation CallSmall Businesses and Small Business Attorneys
Wondering if your company needs a small business attorney? Then you need this guide.
As a small business, you can't afford to keep an attorney available at all times. But when you need legal help, you don't want to get stuck in a situation where you don't have the attorney you need available. When is it the right time to hire a business lawyer?
In this guide, we'll clear up the confusion. Keep reading to find out how to tell when it's time to hire a lawyer!
https://youtu.be/lANpMFALhx4
A small business lawyer can be an expensive investment. You might be wondering if you really need one at all.
Most small businesses will need a small business attorney at some point. But there are a few types of businesses that can succeed without ever needing legal guidance, too. Let's take a look at some of the cases when you might not need a small business lawyer at all.
If your small business exists as a hobby, and not as a money-making venture, legal help probably isn't for you.
Hobby businesses aren't serious businesses that are meant to grow and become profitable. However, many people with "hobby businesses" may not realize that that's what they're doing. They might have a dream of making lots of money but aren't putting in the time or effort to make it happen.
Sometimes, your business is simply a pricey hobby. It's okay to run a business that doesn't make a profit if it's something you enjoy. After all, you can still call yourself an entrepreneur either way! And the good news is that you won't need a lawyer for this kind of business.
Needless to say, there's a great deal of overlap between a hobby business and a company that's not making any money. You might even be losing money as you pursue your business. If your company isn't making money, it's not realistic to hire a lawyer, and you probably don't need one anyway.
One of the main reasons you might need a small business lawyer is to protect your intellectual property, such as your company name. But if your company has a generic name, like "Joe's Electronics," there isn't any intellectual property to protect.
You can't trademark a name that's too generic, so you shouldn't waste your money on a lawyer whose protection you don't need.
Finally, you might be among the minority of business owners who feels capable of handling your own legal tasks. Most of the time, this isn't the best idea. But if you have a legal background, you might feel that you can get by without a lawyer.
For the vast majority of small businesses, the above scenarios don't apply. Most businesses should hire a small business attorney - but it's all about hiring one at the right time. Let's take a look at some of the signs that it's time to get a lawyer on the phone.
If you have plans to grow your company in a major way, you should start talking to a lawyer as soon as possible.
"A major way" means you're planning to make revolutionary changes in your industry, or you want a brand that will go national or even global. If you're planning on having a major impact or major revenue, you'll need a solid legal team on board for the process.
Outside funding can take a number of different forms, from private investors to structured debt
No matter what, you'll be working with complicated securities laws when you start considering outside funding. You might be dealing with both federal and state regulations, and if you violate the laws, there are criminal penalties.
You don't want to pay thousands of dollars of fines, or worse, have to do jail time. Make sure you talk to a business lawyer so you can approach this situation without issues.
If your business doesn't have a generic name like those discussed above, you'll need to protect it. Your brand is innovative or unique - make sure other people can't steal from you.
A lawyer who knows small business and intellectual property laws will be able to help you protect your brand's name and identity from competitors.
The exact number depends on your business. But if you're making a fairly high gross revenue each month - let's say measured in tens of thousands, not just thousands - you should have a lawyer.
Your business is pulling in significant amounts of cash. Even if you have high expenses, there should still be some profit left to work with. An attorney can help you avoid potentially expensive legal issues. If you have enough money coming in to afford a lawyer, get one.
If you're quickly opening up multiple brands, you're probably looking to generate a lot of revenue in the near future. Why waste your energy doing the legal work that it takes to open different brands at the same time? Hiring a lawyer will quickly pay off in this situation.
If you wait to hire a lawyer until you've run into legal trouble, it's too late. As long as you can afford a small business attorney, the sooner you hire one the better.
Speaking to a lawyer will help you avoid foreseeable problems and keep your business healthy and legal.
If your business has defaulted on its SBA loan, it is time to contact an experienced SBA workout attorney to deal with your SBA loan. Not only is the business liable for the debt, but you, as the personal guarantor, are also liable. With the bank and the SBA coming after you for the SBA debt, it is time to retain an SBA attorney.
We can help. Click here to learn more about our SBA services.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.
Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $324,000 to buy a small business and its facility. The business and real estate had an appraisal value of $318,000 at the time of purchase. The business ultimately failed but the participating lender abandoned the business equipment and real estate collateral even though it had valid security liens. As a result, the lender recouped nearly nothing from the pledged collateral, leaving the business owners liable for the deficiency balance. The SBA paid the lender the 7(a) guaranty money and was assigned ownership of the debt, including the right to collect. However, the clients never received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and were denied the opportunity to negotiate an Offer in Compromise (OIC) or a Workout directly with the SBA before being transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service, which added an additional $80,000 in collection fees. Treasury garnished and offset the clients' wages, federal salary and social security benefits. When the clients tried to negotiate with Treasury by themselves, they were offered an unaffordable repayment plan which would have caused severe financial hardship. Clients subsequently hired the Firm to litigate an Appeals Petition before the SBA Office & Hearings Appeals (OHA) challenging the legal enforceability and amount of the debt. The Firm successfully negotiated a term OIC that was approved by the SBA Office of General Counsel, saving the clients approximately $205,000.
The clients are personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan. The SBA referred the debt to the Department of Treasury, which was seeking payment of $487,981 from our clients. We initially filed a Cross-Servicing Dispute, which was denied. As a result, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals asserting legal defenses and supporting evidence uncovered during the discovery and investigation phase of our services. Ultimately, the SBA settled the debt for $25,000 - saving our clients approximately $462,981.
.jpg)
