Facing Legal Action: What to Do When Sued by the U.S. Attorney on a Defaulted SBA Loan
Learn essential steps to take when sued by the U.S. Attorney for a defaulted SBA loan. Understand the process, explore negotiation options, and engage legal aid.
Explore how to use business sale proceeds for an Offer in Compromise, navigate loan deficiencies, and seek legal guidance to manage your financial obligations effectively.

Have you ever wondered, "Can I apply the proceeds from the sale of my business to my Offer in Compromise?" This is a common question, especially for those who have invested significant savings into a business that is now struggling or closing. Losing a business is challenging, and it becomes even more difficult when faced with repaying a Small Business Administration (SBA) loan with limited resources.
When your business can no longer sustain itself, you typically have two options: work with your lender to sell the business or liquidate its assets. This process can be complex, but understanding the steps involved can help you navigate it more effectively.
Most business owners collaborate with their lenders to manage the sale of their business. This could involve selling the entire business to a third party or liquidating assets. While lenders may repossess collateral or appoint a receiver in rare cases, business owners are usually in the best position to oversee the sales process to maximize recovery.
Managing the sale yourself can help you avoid significant fees. For example, brokerage fees can range from 6-12% or more, and auctioneers may charge 25-35% to auction assets. If the bank repossesses and auctions your assets, these costs may be added to your loan balance. In cases like franchises, additional considerations, such as franchisor interests and lease transfers, may arise.
Before selling your business assets, consult with your lender and an attorney. They can guide you on the best course of action and help you understand the implications for your loan balance.
When applying the proceeds from the sale of your business, several questions often arise. Addressing these can provide clarity and help you prepare for the process.
Yes, the proceeds from selling your business or its assets will reduce your loan balance. However, if the proceeds do not cover the full loan amount, you will be responsible for the remaining balance, known as a deficiency. As a guarantor, you must arrange to pay off this deficiency.
There is often confusion about whether sale proceeds affect your Offer in Compromise. While the sale reduces your loan balance, it does not directly reduce your compromised balance. Your offer reflects the remaining balance, not reduced by the sale proceeds, meaning you must address your personal liability separately.
When dealing with a loan deficiency, you must propose a settlement to the lender. This offer typically involves funds from personal resources or borrowing, not from the business sale proceeds. Here’s an example:
ScenarioAmount Original loan balance $100,000 Proceeds from sale of assets $30,000 Deficiency (remaining balance) $70,000 Credit against the offer as guarantor $0
Even if the sale generates significant proceeds, you will still need to propose a resolution for the remaining liability.
When preparing your Offer in Compromise, it is essential to have a clear plan and seek legal advice. This ensures you understand how the proceeds will be applied and helps you manage your financial obligations effectively.
Consulting an attorney before discussing your offer with the lender is invaluable. They can provide insights into how the proceeds will be applied and guide you through the legal complexities of compromise offers. This step is especially important if you are unprepared for the responsibility of reducing your loan balance.
Developing a feasible financial plan is critical for addressing any remaining loan deficiencies. Your plan should account for personal resources and borrowing strategies to create a practical and acceptable offer. This preparation not only safeguards your financial stability but also reduces stress during negotiations with your lender.
In conclusion, while applying the proceeds from the sale of your business may seem straightforward, the process can be complex. By understanding the steps involved and seeking professional guidance, you can address your financial obligations with confidence. Protect Law Group specializes in assisting individuals with SBA loan issues, offering tailored solutions to help you navigate these challenges effectively.
Are you navigating the complexities of selling your business while managing an SBA loan? Protect Law Group is here to help. Our experienced SBA attorneys specialize in guiding business owners through the legal and financial intricacies of applying sale proceeds to an Offer in Compromise. Whether you're dealing with loan deficiencies or exploring settlement options, our team provides tailored solutions to help you achieve financial resolution. Contact us today at (833) 428-0937 for a case evaluation and take the first step toward clarity and peace of mind.
No, the proceeds from the sale of your business do not directly reduce your Offer in Compromise. While the sale proceeds decrease your loan balance, your Offer in Compromise reflects the remaining balance after the sale, which you must settle separately using personal resources or other means.
Yes, the proceeds from selling your business or its assets will reduce your loan balance. However, if the proceeds do not cover the full loan amount, you will still be responsible for the remaining balance, known as a deficiency, which guarantors are expected to pay.
If the sale proceeds do not cover the full loan amount, you will be responsible for the remaining balance, referred to as a deficiency. This deficiency must be addressed separately, often through an Offer in Compromise or other financial arrangements.
Yes, consulting an attorney is highly recommended before selling your business or making an Offer in Compromise. Legal guidance can help you understand how the sale proceeds will be applied and assist in crafting a realistic plan to manage your financial obligations effectively.
An Offer in Compromise is a settlement proposal made to your lender to resolve the remaining loan balance after the sale of your business. It typically involves offering funds from personal resources or borrowing, as business sale proceeds cannot be used directly for the offer.
Having a financial plan is crucial to ensure you can address the loan deficiency after selling your business. A well-prepared plan accounts for personal resources and borrowing strategies, helping you create a practical and acceptable offer while reducing financial stress during negotiations with your lender.

Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.

Our firm successfully negotiated an SBA offer in compromise (SBA OIC), settling a $974,535.93 SBA loan balance for just $18,000. The offerors, personal guarantors on an SBA 7(a) loan, originally obtained financing to purchase a commercial building in Lancaster, California.
The borrower filed for bankruptcy, and the third-party lender (TPL) foreclosed on the property. Despite the loan default, the SBA pursued the offerors for repayment. Given their limited income, lack of significant assets, and approaching retirement, we presented a strong case demonstrating their financial hardship.
Through strategic negotiations, we secured a favorable SBA settlement, reducing the nearly $1 million debt to a fraction of the amount owed. This outcome allowed the offerors to resolve their liability without prolonged financial strain.

Small business and guarantors obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $1,000,000. Clients defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for collection. Treasury added nearly $500,000 in collection fees totaling $1,500,000. Clients were served with the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice and exercised the Repayment option by applying for the SBA’s Hardship Accommodation Plan. However, their application was summarily rejected by the SBA without providing any meaningful reasons. Clients hired the Firm to represent them against the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury. During litigation and before the OHA court issued a final Decision and Order, the Firm successfully negotiated a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, a modification of the original repayment terms, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.