Qualifications for Borrowers Seeking Relief Under COVID Debt Measures
Navigate the Complete COVID Collections Act with our guide. Understand borrower qualifications for debt relief, including critical criteria and documentation requirements.
Dive into the Complete COVID Collections Act for insights on pandemic loan collections, financial recovery, and legal compliance. Stay informed today!

Have you ever wondered how legislation shapes the financial landscape during critical times, especially when it involves something as impactful as the COVID-19 pandemic? The Complete COVID Collections Act is a pivotal piece of legislation designed to guide the financial recovery efforts initiated to support small businesses. As a seasoned Federal Debt Default lawyer at Protect Law Group, I, SBA Marc, provide a thorough breakdown of this act, revealing how it influences collections related to pandemic relief loans.

The Complete COVID Collections Act is structured to address several key areas of concern for both lenders and borrowers involved in the COVID-19 pandemic relief efforts. Understanding these provisions is essential for financial stability and legal compliance.
The act sternly prohibits the suspension of collections on certain loans. These are primarily those loans guaranteed under the Small Business Act during the pandemic. This provision ensures that small businesses remain accountable for their financial obligations while still aligning with the broader economic recovery goals. It helps in maintaining a steady cash flow to support businesses during these challenging times.
A significant stipulation within the act is the referral of claims to the Department of the Treasury for loans under $100,000. This process ensures that smaller loans don't slip through the cracks and that appropriate measures are taken to recover owed amounts. The role of the Department of the Treasury in this context is pivotal, as it provides a structured framework for addressing and processing such claims efficiently.
Transparency and accountability are cornerstones of the act. As such, the SBA Administrator has the duty to provide Congress with monthly briefings. These updates on the progress of loan collections and related activities offer a layer of oversight, ensuring that all stakeholders are informed and that expectations are managed effectively throughout the process.
Fraud is an inevitable risk in large-scale financial relief efforts. This act imposes a 10-year limit for filing criminal or civil actions related to fraud for any loan or grant made under COVID-19 relief programs. This limitation allows time for thorough investigations while ensuring that fraudulent activities are prosecuted, safeguarding the integrity of the relief programs.
Data transparency is crucial for understanding the scope and success of recovery efforts. The act mandates that the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee provide real-time data regarding funds recovered by the Federal government from COVID-19 relief programs. This transparency is vital for policymakers, the public, and other stakeholders to assess the effectiveness of the relief measures and make informed decisions in the future.
To navigate the Complete COVID Collections Act effectively, understanding its terminology is essential. Here are some key definitions:
"Covered Loan" refers to loans guaranteed under specific sections of the Small Business Act, particularly those related to COVID-19 economic relief efforts. These loans include those provided under prominent programs like the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which were designed to support struggling businesses.
The term "Covered Programs" encompasses a wide range of loan and grant programs established during the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes programs like the Paycheck Protection Program and grants designed to support shuttered venues and restaurants. Recognizing which loans and grants fall under this definition is crucial for applying the act’s provisions correctly.
Oversight and reporting structures are integral components of the Complete COVID Collections Act. They ensure that all activities related to loan collections are conducted with the highest levels of integrity and transparency.
Coordination between the SBA and the Inspector General is a key focus of the act. By allowing for improved oversight, this relationship ensures accurate reporting of the use and recovery of COVID-19 relief funds. Regular inspections and reports are mechanisms by which compliance and efficacy are monitored, contributing to the financial health of participating entities.
The act requires the Attorney General to submit monthly reports to Congress detailing prosecution activities related to covered programs. These reports include metrics on enforcement actions, offering valuable insights into the legal and procedural aspects of managing the COVID-19 relief efforts.
The fundamental intent of the Complete COVID Collections Act revolves around maintaining financial accountability and ensuring efficient collections of loans provided to support small businesses during the pandemic. This intent aligns with the overarching goal of sustaining the COVID-19 recovery framework and promoting economic resilience.
In dissecting the Complete COVID Collections Act, we discover a complex, yet cohesive effort to reinforce financial discipline while supporting small businesses through recovery post-pandemic. Each provision, carefully crafted, fulfills the dual purpose of accountability and relief. As an advisor at Protect Law Group, understanding such legislation is critical for guiding businesses effectively, ensuring compliance, and fostering informed decision-making. This comprehensive understanding equips businesses and legal professionals alike to navigate these challenging times adeptly.

Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $324,000 to buy a small business and its facility. The business and real estate had an appraisal value of $318,000 at the time of purchase. The business ultimately failed but the participating lender abandoned the business equipment and real estate collateral even though it had valid security liens. As a result, the lender recouped nearly nothing from the pledged collateral, leaving the business owners liable for the deficiency balance. The SBA paid the lender the 7(a) guaranty money and was assigned ownership of the debt, including the right to collect. However, the clients never received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and were denied the opportunity to negotiate an Offer in Compromise (OIC) or a Workout directly with the SBA before being transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service, which added an additional $80,000 in collection fees. Treasury garnished and offset the clients' wages, federal salary and social security benefits. When the clients tried to negotiate with Treasury by themselves, they were offered an unaffordable repayment plan which would have caused severe financial hardship. Clients subsequently hired the Firm to litigate an Appeals Petition before the SBA Office & Hearings Appeals (OHA) challenging the legal enforceability and amount of the debt. The Firm successfully negotiated a term OIC that was approved by the SBA Office of General Counsel, saving the clients approximately $205,000.

Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan balance of $58,000. The client received a notice of Intent to initiate Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG) Proceedings. We represented the client at the hearing and successfully defeated the AWG Order based on several legal and equitable grounds.

Client's small business obtained an SBA COVID EIDL for $301,000 pledging collateral by executing the Note, Unconditional Guarantee and Security Agreement. The business defaulted on the loan and the SBA CESC called the Note and Guarantee, accelerated the principal balance due, accrued interest and retracted the 30-year term schedule.
The loan was transferred to the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service which resulted in the statutory addition of $90,000+ in administrative fees, costs, penalties and interest with the total debt now at $391.000+. Treasury also initiated a Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against the client's federal contractor payments for the full amount each month - intercepting all of its revenue and pushing the business to the brink of bankruptcy.
The Firm was hired to investigate and find an alternate solution to the bankruptcy option. After submitting formal production requests for all government records, it was discovered that the SBA failed to send the required Official 60-Day Pre-Referral Notice to the borrower and guarantor prior to referring the debt to Treasury. This procedural due process violation served as the basis to submit a Cross-Servicing Dispute to recall the debt from Treasury back to the SBA and to negotiate a reinstatement of the original 30-year maturity date, a modified workout, cessation of the TOP levy against the federal contractor payments and removal of the $90,000+ Treasury-based collection fees, interest and penalties.