Potential Impact on Borrowers and Lenders Amid COVID Collections Act Provisions
Explore how the COVID Collections Act impacts borrowers and lenders. Gain insights on legislative provisions affecting loan collections and financial accountability.
Explore the timeline for the Complete COVID Collections Act, addressing loan collections and enforcement post-pandemic. Understand key provisions and implementation steps.

Have you been keeping abreast of recent legislative developments concerning loans made during the COVID-19 pandemic? The Complete COVID Collections Act, a significant piece of legislation, aims to address the collection of loans provided to small businesses under pandemic relief initiatives. As a seasoned Federal Debt Default lawyer with the Protect Law Group Firm, understanding the timeline and implications of this Act is crucial for advising clients and navigating the potential challenges it presents. Let's explore the details of this legislation, its key provisions, and the scheduled timeline for its implementation.

This Act has been designed to ensure that the financial mechanisms supporting small businesses remain efficient and accountable. The provisions are both proactive and corrective, safeguarding the interests of the government and ensuring that businesses adhere to their financial responsibilities.
Under the Complete COVID Collections Act, a critical aspect is that the bill prohibits the suspension of collections on loans guaranteed under particular provisions of the Small Business Act. These loans were essential lifelines during the pandemic, and maintaining their collection is vital for fiscal stability and accountability.
The Act specifies that claims related to loans under $100,000 must be referred by the Small Business Administration (SBA) to the Department of the Treasury for action. This referral is intended to streamline the process, ensuring that claims are managed effectively and efficiently, minimizing potential losses and facilitating timely recovery of funds.
Transparency and accountability are reinforced through the requirement for the SBA Administrator to provide monthly briefings to Congress. These updates will focus on the progress of loan collections and related activities, offering valuable insights into the program's effectiveness and identifying areas needing attention or improvement.
Fraud prevention and accountability are crucial elements of the Act. It establishes a 10-year limit for filing criminal or civil actions concerning fraud for any loan or grant made under COVID-19 relief programs. This provision ensures that potential fraudulent activities are investigated and addressed within a reasonable timeframe, protecting the integrity of these financial aids.
Data transparency is an essential element in the management and oversight of these programs. The Act places a requirement on the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee to maintain real-time data regarding funds recovered by the Federal government from COVID-19 relief. This real-time data serves as a tool for public accountability and effective oversight, providing insights into fund utilization and recovery processes.
Understanding the specific terminology used in the Complete COVID Collections Act is essential for comprehending its scope and application. These definitions clarify the types of loans and programs covered under this legislation.
The term "Covered Loan" includes loans guaranteed under specific sections of the Small Business Act, particularly those related to COVID-19 economic injury. These loans formed the backbone of financial support for numerous small businesses during the pandemic, and their collection is crucial for the sustainability of such programs.
"Covered Programs" refer to a range of loan and grant initiatives established under COVID-19 relief legislation. These include the Paycheck Protection Program and grants for shuttered venues and restaurants. The scope of these programs points to their significant role in stabilizing businesses during the uncertainties of the pandemic period.
Oversight and consistent reporting are the cornerstones that ensure the effective implementation of the Complete COVID Collections Act. This dimension of the Act seeks to foster collaboration between governmental entities to promote comprehensive accountability.
The Act allows for improved coordination between the SBA and the Inspector General, aiming to ensure accurate reporting and oversight of COVID-19 relief programs. This collaborative approach is intended to detect discrepancies, prevent misuse, and enhance the effectiveness of these relief efforts.
Further emphasizing oversight, the Attorney General is mandated to report monthly to Congress on activities regarding prosecutions associated with covered programs. These reports will include metrics on enforcement actions, providing insights into the legal dimensions of enforcement and compliance related to pandemic relief efforts.
The legislative intent behind the Complete COVID Collections Act is multifold, focusing on maintaining financial accountability, supporting the financial stability of small businesses, and ensuring the efficient collection of loans. It aims to reinforce the COVID-19 recovery framework, which is still vital as businesses continue to navigate a post-pandemic landscape.
The timeline for the implementation of the Complete COVID Collections Act is meticulously crafted to ensure a smooth transition into active oversight and enforcement. Here's a detailed breakdown:
Month Activity Month 1 Bill Passage & Initial Setup Month 2 SBA to begin referrals of claims under $100,000 to Treasury Month 3 First monthly briefing to Congress by SBA Administrator Month 4 Data systems update for real-time tracking of fund recovery Month 5 Initiation of law enforcement procedures for fraud detection Month 6 Initial Attorney General report to Congress Month 7 Review of progress and initial program audits Month 8 First adjustments and optimizations based on feedback
This timeline aims to facilitate a step-by-step implementation, allowing stakeholders to adapt to new processes and ensuring that the provisions are enacted effectively.
In conclusion, the Complete COVID Collections Act represents a significant effort to ensure that the financial relief provided during the COVID-19 pandemic remains effective, accountable, and transparent. As these loans were crucial for the survival of small businesses, their continued collection is important for maintaining the stability of the recovery framework. The Act's provisions, encompassing loan collection procedures, fraud prevention, and data transparency, aim to reinforce trust and efficiency in government aid programs.
As professionals in the legal domain dealing with federal debt defaults, understanding the intricacies of this Act can inform decision-making and advisory roles. The coordinated oversight and reporting mechanisms proposed by the Act are set to instill confidence in the program’s efficacy and integrity. Staying informed on the Act’s implementation timeline allows practitioners to provide timely advice and anticipate potential challenges.
By remaining diligent and knowledgeable about such policies, you can ensure that your practice and your clients navigate the complexities of COVID-19 relief programs with enhanced clarity and compliance.

Small business sole proprietor obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $500,000. Client defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for aggressive collection. Treasury added $180,000 in collection fees totaling $680,000+. Client tried to negotiate with Treasury but was only offered a 3-year or 10-year repayment plan. Client hired the Firm to represent before the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery and reviewing them, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury citing a host of purported violations. The Firm was able to negotiate a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, participation in the Hardship Accommodation Plan, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.

Our firm successfully assisted a client in closing an SBA Disaster Loan tied to a COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL). The borrower obtained an EIDL loan of $153,800, but due to the prolonged economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the business was unable to recover and ultimately closed.
As part of the business closure review and audit, we worked closely with the SBA to negotiate a resolution. The borrower was required to pay only $1,625 to release the remaining collateral, effectively closing the matter without further financial liability for the owner/officer.
This case highlights the importance of strategic negotiations when dealing with SBA settlements, particularly for businesses that have shut down due to unforeseen economic challenges. If you or your business are struggling with SBA loan debt, we focus on SBA Offer in Compromise (SBA OIC) solutions to help settle outstanding obligations efficiently.

Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000. COVID-19 caused the business to fail, and the loan went into default with a balance of $133,000. Client initially hired a non-attorney consultant to negotiate an OIC. The SBA summarily rejected the ineligible OIC and the debt was referred to Treasury’s ureau of Fiscal Service for enforced collection in the debt amount of $195,000. We were hired to intervene and initiated discovery for SBA and Fiscal Service records. We were able to recall the case from Fiscal Service back to the SBA. We then negotiated a structured workout with favorable terms that saves the client approximately $198,000 over the agreed-upon workout term by waiving contractual and statutory administrative fees, collection costs, penalties, and interest.