Qualifications for Borrowers Seeking Relief Under COVID Debt Measures
Navigate the Complete COVID Collections Act with our guide. Understand borrower qualifications for debt relief, including critical criteria and documentation requirements.
Explore the timeline for the Complete COVID Collections Act, addressing loan collections and enforcement post-pandemic. Understand key provisions and implementation steps.

Have you been keeping abreast of recent legislative developments concerning loans made during the COVID-19 pandemic? The Complete COVID Collections Act, a significant piece of legislation, aims to address the collection of loans provided to small businesses under pandemic relief initiatives. As a seasoned Federal Debt Default lawyer with the Protect Law Group Firm, understanding the timeline and implications of this Act is crucial for advising clients and navigating the potential challenges it presents. Let's explore the details of this legislation, its key provisions, and the scheduled timeline for its implementation.

This Act has been designed to ensure that the financial mechanisms supporting small businesses remain efficient and accountable. The provisions are both proactive and corrective, safeguarding the interests of the government and ensuring that businesses adhere to their financial responsibilities.
Under the Complete COVID Collections Act, a critical aspect is that the bill prohibits the suspension of collections on loans guaranteed under particular provisions of the Small Business Act. These loans were essential lifelines during the pandemic, and maintaining their collection is vital for fiscal stability and accountability.
The Act specifies that claims related to loans under $100,000 must be referred by the Small Business Administration (SBA) to the Department of the Treasury for action. This referral is intended to streamline the process, ensuring that claims are managed effectively and efficiently, minimizing potential losses and facilitating timely recovery of funds.
Transparency and accountability are reinforced through the requirement for the SBA Administrator to provide monthly briefings to Congress. These updates will focus on the progress of loan collections and related activities, offering valuable insights into the program's effectiveness and identifying areas needing attention or improvement.
Fraud prevention and accountability are crucial elements of the Act. It establishes a 10-year limit for filing criminal or civil actions concerning fraud for any loan or grant made under COVID-19 relief programs. This provision ensures that potential fraudulent activities are investigated and addressed within a reasonable timeframe, protecting the integrity of these financial aids.
Data transparency is an essential element in the management and oversight of these programs. The Act places a requirement on the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee to maintain real-time data regarding funds recovered by the Federal government from COVID-19 relief. This real-time data serves as a tool for public accountability and effective oversight, providing insights into fund utilization and recovery processes.
Understanding the specific terminology used in the Complete COVID Collections Act is essential for comprehending its scope and application. These definitions clarify the types of loans and programs covered under this legislation.
The term "Covered Loan" includes loans guaranteed under specific sections of the Small Business Act, particularly those related to COVID-19 economic injury. These loans formed the backbone of financial support for numerous small businesses during the pandemic, and their collection is crucial for the sustainability of such programs.
"Covered Programs" refer to a range of loan and grant initiatives established under COVID-19 relief legislation. These include the Paycheck Protection Program and grants for shuttered venues and restaurants. The scope of these programs points to their significant role in stabilizing businesses during the uncertainties of the pandemic period.
Oversight and consistent reporting are the cornerstones that ensure the effective implementation of the Complete COVID Collections Act. This dimension of the Act seeks to foster collaboration between governmental entities to promote comprehensive accountability.
The Act allows for improved coordination between the SBA and the Inspector General, aiming to ensure accurate reporting and oversight of COVID-19 relief programs. This collaborative approach is intended to detect discrepancies, prevent misuse, and enhance the effectiveness of these relief efforts.
Further emphasizing oversight, the Attorney General is mandated to report monthly to Congress on activities regarding prosecutions associated with covered programs. These reports will include metrics on enforcement actions, providing insights into the legal dimensions of enforcement and compliance related to pandemic relief efforts.
The legislative intent behind the Complete COVID Collections Act is multifold, focusing on maintaining financial accountability, supporting the financial stability of small businesses, and ensuring the efficient collection of loans. It aims to reinforce the COVID-19 recovery framework, which is still vital as businesses continue to navigate a post-pandemic landscape.
The timeline for the implementation of the Complete COVID Collections Act is meticulously crafted to ensure a smooth transition into active oversight and enforcement. Here's a detailed breakdown:
Month Activity Month 1 Bill Passage & Initial Setup Month 2 SBA to begin referrals of claims under $100,000 to Treasury Month 3 First monthly briefing to Congress by SBA Administrator Month 4 Data systems update for real-time tracking of fund recovery Month 5 Initiation of law enforcement procedures for fraud detection Month 6 Initial Attorney General report to Congress Month 7 Review of progress and initial program audits Month 8 First adjustments and optimizations based on feedback
This timeline aims to facilitate a step-by-step implementation, allowing stakeholders to adapt to new processes and ensuring that the provisions are enacted effectively.
In conclusion, the Complete COVID Collections Act represents a significant effort to ensure that the financial relief provided during the COVID-19 pandemic remains effective, accountable, and transparent. As these loans were crucial for the survival of small businesses, their continued collection is important for maintaining the stability of the recovery framework. The Act's provisions, encompassing loan collection procedures, fraud prevention, and data transparency, aim to reinforce trust and efficiency in government aid programs.
As professionals in the legal domain dealing with federal debt defaults, understanding the intricacies of this Act can inform decision-making and advisory roles. The coordinated oversight and reporting mechanisms proposed by the Act are set to instill confidence in the program’s efficacy and integrity. Staying informed on the Act’s implementation timeline allows practitioners to provide timely advice and anticipate potential challenges.
By remaining diligent and knowledgeable about such policies, you can ensure that your practice and your clients navigate the complexities of COVID-19 relief programs with enhanced clarity and compliance.

Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000. He and his wife signed personal guarantees and pledged their home as collateral. The SBA loan went into default, the term or maturity date was accelerated and demand for payment of the entire amount claimed was made. The SBA lender’s note gave it the right to adjust the default interest rate from 7.25% to 18% per annum. The business filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy but was dismissed after 3 years due to its inability to continue with payments under the plan. Clients wanted to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which would have been a mistake as their home had significant equity to repay the SBA loan balance in full as the Trustee would likely seize and sell the home to repay the secured and unsecured creditors. However, the SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection to the SBA. Clients then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and hired the Firm to respond to it and negotiate on their behalf. Clients disputed the SBA’s alleged balance of $148,000, as several payments made to the SBA lender during the Chapter 11 reorganization were not accounted for. To challenge the SBA’s claimed debt balance, the Firm Attorneys initiated expedited discovery to obtain government records. SBA records disclosed the true amount owed was about $97,000. Moreover, because the Clients’ home had significant equity, they were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise or an immediate Release of Lien for Consideration, despite being incorrectly advised by non-attorney consulting companies that they were. Instead, our Firm Attorneys recommended a Workout of $97,000 spread over a lengthy term and a waiver of the applicable interest rate making the monthly payment affordable. After back and forth negotiations, SBA approved the Workout proposal, thereby saving the home from imminent foreclosure and reducing the Clients' liability by nearly $81,000 in incorrect principal balance, accrued interest, and statutory collection fees.

Our firm successfully resolved an SBA COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) in the original amount of $150,000 for a Florida-based borrower. The loan, issued on June 4, 2020, was secured by business assets and potential personal liability through the SBA's Security Agreement.
Following the permanent closure of the business, we guided the client through the SBA’s Business Closure Review process and prepared a comprehensive collateral analysis. We negotiated directly with the SBA, obtaining a full release of the business collateral for $2,910 — satisfying the borrower’s obligations under the Security Agreement and eliminating any further enforcement risk against the pledged assets.

Client received the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice for a loan that was obtained by her small business in 2001. The SBA loan went into default in 2004 but after hearing nothing from the SBA lender or the SBA for 20 years, out of the blue, she received the SBA's collection due process notice which provided her with only one of four options: (1) repay the entire accelerated balance immediately; (2) negotiate a repayment arrangement; (3) challenge the legal enforceability of the debt with evidence; or (4) request an OHA hearing before a U.S. Administrative Law Judge.
Client hired the Firm to represent her with only 13 days left before the expiration deadline to respond to the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice. The Firm attorneys immediately researched the SBA's Official loan database to obtain information regarding the 7(a) loan. Thereafter, the Firm attorneys conducted legal research and asserted certain affirmative defenses challenging the legal enforceability of the debt. A written response was timely filed to the 60-Day Notice with the SBA subsequently agreeing with the client's affirmative defenses and legal arguments. As a result, the SBA rendered a decision immediately terminating collection of the debt against the client's alleged personal guarantee liability saving her $50,000.