Divorce Attorneys Need to Avoid This 1 SBA Loan Pitfall
A settlement or judgement in a divorce does not absolve your client of liability on a defaulted SBA loan. Don't leave your client on the hook.
Review federal employee salary offsets related to SBA debt and learn about the appeal issues addressed in this article.
Book a Consultation CallThe transcript of the video follows below for further review.
If you have defaulted on a Small Business Administration (SBA) loan and you are a federal employee, more than likely the Department of Treasury (DOT) will send you a notice stating that the DOT will offset your wages or salary, that is, take a portion of your paycheck every pay period until the debt is paid.
You can, however, appeal the wage garnishment or offset to the SBA’s Office of Hearing and Appeal (OHA). This course should not be pursued lightly and is not appropriate for a non-attorney or an inexperienced attorney in OHA cases.
The OHA assigns an administrative law judge (ALJ) to handle your appeal. The SBA will similarly assign an attorney to represent the SBA in the appeal. As stated, an OHA appeal amounts to a litigated case with provisions for motions, subpoenas, motions for summary judgment, etc. Moreover, if the law and provisions of the OHA appeal process are not followed, a petitioner may be subject to sanctions by the OHA. One should not be penny wise and pound foolish when it comes to appealing a federal salary offset or garnishment.
The OHA appeal of your federal salary garnishment or offset can, however, be an effective avenue to resolve your SBA loan default either by judicial decision or by settlement with the SBA. If you can prove that the debt does not exist or is not enforceable, you may secure relief from the debt and the wage garnishment or offset. A strong appeal may also convince the SBA that the debt should be settled rather than litigated in front of the OHA.
If you have defaulted on an SBA loan and are a federal employee, please contact Protect Law Group for a consultation at 1-888-756-9969 or visit our website at www.sba-attorneys.com.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.

Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $750,000. She and her husband signed personal guarantees exposing all of their non-exempt income and assets. With just 18 months left on the maturity date and payment on the remaining balance, the Great Recession of 2008 hit, which ultimately caused the business to fail and default on the loan terms. The 7(a) lender accelerated and sent a demand for full payment of the remaining loan balance. The SBA lender’s note allowed for a default interest rate of about 7% per year. In response to the lender's aggressive collection action, Client's husband filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in an attempt to protect against their personal assets. However, his bankruptcy discharge did not relieve the Client's personal guarantee liability for the SBA debt. The SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection against the Client to the SBA. The Client then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice. After conducting a Case Evaluation with her, she then hired the Firm to respond and negotiate on her behalf with just 34 days left before the impending referral to Treasury. The Client wanted to dispute the SBA’s alleged debt balance as stated in the 60-Day Notice by claiming the 7(a) lender failed to liquidate business collateral in a commercially reasonable manner - which if done properly - proceeds would have paid back the entire debt balance. However, due to time constraints, waivers contained in the SBA loan instruments, including the fact the Client was not able to inspect the SBA's records for investigation purposes before the remaining deadline, Client agreed to submit a Structured Workout for the alleged balance in response to the Official 60-Day Notice as she was not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) because of equity in non-exempt income and assets. After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist approved the Workout proposal, reducing the Client's purported liability by nearly $142,142.27 in accrued interest, and statutory collection fees. Without the Firm's intervention and subsequent approval of the Workout proposal, the Client's debt amount (with accrued interest, Treasury's statutory collection fee and Treasury's interest based on the Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) would have been nearly $291,030.

Clients personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan balance of $65,000 for their Texas-based business. The SBA loan was paid down to $41,000 before the business failed. The loan was referred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service. Treasury assessed its collection fees increasing the debt to $66,000. The client received a Notice of Intent to Initiate Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG) Proceedings. The Firm represented the client at the hearing and successfully challenged the legal enforceability of the debt. Based on our legal arguments, the Hearing Officer issued a Decision and Order terminating collection of the $66,000 debt by operation of law.

Our firm successfully resolved an SBA 7(a) loan default in the amount of $212,000 on behalf of an individual guarantor. The borrower’s business experienced a significant downturn in revenue and was unable to sustain operations, ultimately leading to closure and a remaining personal guaranty obligation.
After conducting a thorough financial review and preparing a comprehensive SBA Offer in Compromise (SBA OIC) submission, we negotiated directly with the SBA and lender to achieve a settlement of $50,000—approximately 24% of the outstanding balance. This favorable resolution released the guarantor from further personal liability and provided the opportunity to move forward free from the burden of enforced collection.