Demystifying SBA Lien Release: What Borrowers Need to Know
Are you currently dealing with an SBA Lien? Our team at Protect Law Group is here to keep you informed to help you take back control of your assets. Learn more today!
The transcript of the video follows below for further review.
Once an SBA loan has been delinquent between 120 days (4 months) and 180 days (6 months), the loan is generally referred to the U.S. Treasury Department’s Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Treasury will then employ a number of administrative collection tactics to try and collect the debt. One of the Government’s most powerful weapons is to refer the debt to the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) for litigation . . . and this gives the Government superior leverage against the SBA obligor.
It is important to understand the litigation process that might threaten an SBA obligor’s assets. Hence, below is an overview of how an SBA claim is proven and enforced when an SBA debt is referred to the DoJ for litigation.
From the outset of the civil action, the DoJ through the U.S. Attorney’s Office representing the SBA may use a variety of techniques to try to obtain security in an SBA obligor’s assets before the trial has even begun. If the alleged debt is unsecured (e.g., the SBA obligor did not allow the lender of record, CDC or the SBA to place a lien on his personal or real property), the SBA may try, with approval from the court, to “attach” or otherwise create a lien upon the real estate or personal property within the SBA obligor’s control. The DoJ may also seek a “trustee process” to try to obtain a lien over SBA obligor’s tangible and intangible assets, his “goods, effects, and credits,” that are held by a third party. The trustee process is primarily used to attach monies held in banks or other financial institutions. The DoJ may even seek a “freeze” injunction in an effort to prevent the SBA obligor from encumbering, transferring or disposing of his assets during the pendency of the case.
The DoJ can employ these pre-trial security tools both to create security in the SBA obligor’s property should judgment eventually enter for the SBA, and to put pressure on the alleged SBA debtor to settle. However, several types of property are exempt from attachment and trustee process. Moreover, before the SBA will be able to establish these types of liens, it will need to meet certain legal standards in order to gain court approval. In most cases, an SBA defendant will be notified that the SBA is seeking a trustee process or is attempting to attach his property and will have an opportunity to contest its efforts. Occasionally (although rarely), the SBA may be permitted to attach a defendant’s property or be granted trustee process without advance notice to the defendant if the SBA can demonstrate that the defendant is likely to transfer, convey, or conceal the property if notified in advance of the attachment.
Once a complaint is filed and any attachment efforts are resolved, the suit will then proceed into a “pretrial” or “discovery” phase. During the discovery phase, each party to the litigation attempts to learn as much as he can about the other party’s case. This process involves document requests, interrogatories (written questions), requests for admissions (written questions requiring positive affirmation or denial), and the taking of “depositions,” which involves direct questioning, under oath, of persons having knowledge about the facts forming the basis of the lawsuit (whether or not they are parties to the lawsuit). A transcript is generally made at most depositions. Any party to the litigation is generally free to have counsel present to ask questions of the person being deposed. Depositions are generally taken of each party and his key witnesses. In a suit against an SBA debtor, the DoJ’s Assistant U.S. Attorney would normally take depositions. Counsel representing the SBA debtor will reciprocate with depositions of the SBA’s relevant witnesses.
During the discovery process, each party will also prepare his own case and marshal his own witnesses. It can take as much as a couple of years to proceed through the discovery phase and reach the trial stage. However, cases with no disputed factual issues, can be resolved much more quickly, and sometimes without a trial.
Assuming the entire case is not dismissed before trial, it will either be settled, won on a summary judgment motion or proceed to trial before a federal judge or magistrate as most SBA obligors generally waive their right to a jury when they initially executed the Unconditional Guarantee as part of the SBA loan process.
The discovery process is designed to insure that all parties have had an opportunity to ascertain all of the relevant facts in the case prior to trial. Ideally, the process facilitates final disposition or settlement. At its worst, the discovery process can be used to intimidate a party into settlement by imposing prohibitive pretrial costs.
After a trial, the judge or magistrate will render a decision. The court decree or order incorporating this decision is called a “judgment.” A judgment against an SBA defendant may also include a monetary damage award for which he is responsible. Pre-judgment interest, which in most cases is calculated from the date of the filing of the original civil action, will also be added to the total judgment amount. The losing party will be given the statutory time frame to file an appeal with an appellate court from the entry of judgment against him if he believes that the judge or magistrate in the trial court committed a serious error. The filing of the appeal stays the enforcement of the judgment, but does not stay the accumulation of interest on the judgment if it is upheld. The appeal process in court can take additional time. Many cases are settled during the appeal process because (a) the SBA, if it has won, wants the money sooner rather than later and is not willing to risk a reversal of its favorable verdict in the trial court on appeal, and (b) the defendant, if he has lost, is concerned that he may not be able to obtain a reversal of the adverse judgment.
After all appeals are exhausted and barring settlement, a final judgment is entered in the trial court. In this typical case, it has taken several years to get to this point. The successful SBA plaintiff can then obtain what is called an “execution” on the judgment from the court. The execution is an order by the court to the sheriff to enforce the judgment by seizing and selling, if necessary, assets of the SBA defendant sufficient to pay the judgment. At this point, the SBA plaintiff becomes what is known as a “judgment creditor.”
If an SBA defendant/debtor refuses to pay a judgment after service of an execution by the sheriff, the judgment creditor can use the execution to “levy and sell” the SBA defendant’s real or personal property. This is typically done through a “sheriff’s sale.”
If an SBA defendant refuses or fails to pay a judgment, the SBA judgment creditor can conduct post-trial discovery (interrogatories, document requests, requests for admissions, and depositions) in order to locate the defendant/debtor’s assets. Moreover, through a procedure called “supplementary process” the SBA judgment creditor can bring the SBA defendant/debtor before the court to question him with regard to his assets, income, transfers of property, and the like. The court can order the SBA defendant to deliver property to the judgment creditor, execute papers for the conveyance of property, or make periodic payments in satisfaction of the judgment. Attendance at supplementary process proceedings is enforceable by arrest. Failure to obey any supplementary process order of a court constitutes a contempt of court punishable by imprisonment or other penalty.
In most cases, an SBA judgment creditor generally has twenty years to collect on a judgment. An SBA defendant can be brought into court for additional supplementary process proceedings as long as the federal judgment remains unsatisfied. Note that the SBA can renew a federal judgment in increments of 20 years.
If you are facing an SBA loan default or a Treasury/Bureau of Fiscal Service debt problem that has been referred to a Private Collection Agency, contact us today for a consultation with an experienced attorney at 888-756-9969
We can analyze your SBA loan, Treasury/BFS debt or Private Collection Agency problem and advise you on potential solutions.
Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure
Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements
Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.
Our firm successfully facilitated the SBA settlement of a COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) where borrower received an SBA disaster loan of $150,000, but due to the severe economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the business was unable to recover.
Despite the borrower’s efforts to maintain operations, shutdowns and restrictions significantly reduced the customer base and revenue, making continued operations unsustainable. After a thorough business closure review, we negotiated with the SBA, securing a resolution where the borrower paid only $6,015 to release the collateral, with no further financial liability for the owner/officer.
This case demonstrates how businesses affected by the pandemic can navigate SBA loan settlements effectively. If your business is struggling with an SBA EIDL loan, we specialize in SBA Offer in Compromise (SBA OIC) solutions to help close outstanding debts while minimizing financial burden.
Clients executed personal and corporate guarantees for an SBA 7(a) loan from a Preferred Lender Provider (PLP). The borrower corporation defaulted on the loan exposing all collateral pledged by the Clients. The SBA subsequently acquired the loan balance from the PLP, including the right to collect against all guarantors. The SBA sent the Official Pre-Referral Notice to the guarantors giving them sixty (60) days to either pay the outstanding balance in full, negotiate a Repayment (Offer in Compromise (OIC) or Structured Workout (SW)), challenge their alleged guarantor liability or file a Request for Hearing (Appeals Petition) with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals.
Because the Clients were not financially eligible for an OIC, they opted for Structured Workout negotiations directly with the SBA before the debt was transferred to the Bureau of Fiscal Service, a division of the U.S. Department of Treasury for enforced collection.
The Firm was hired to negotiate a global Workout Agreement directly with the SBA to resolve the personal and corporate guarantees. After submitting the Structured Workout proposal, the assigned SBA Loan Specialist approved the requested terms in under ten (10) days without any lengthy back and forth negotiations.
The favorable terms of the Workout included an extended maturity at an affordable principal amount, along with a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Clients approximately $181,000 in administrative fees, penalties and interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)) as authorized by 31 U.S.C. § 3717(e) had the SBA loan been transferred to BFS.
Small business sole proprietor obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $500,000. Client defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for aggressive collection. Treasury added $180,000 in collection fees totaling $680,000+. Client tried to negotiate with Treasury but was only offered a 3-year or 10-year repayment plan. Client hired the Firm to represent before the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency. After securing government records through discovery and reviewing them, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury citing a host of purported violations. The Firm was able to negotiate a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, participation in the Hardship Accommodation Plan, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.