If you Owe more than $30,000 contact us for a case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
contact us for a free case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
Call us (833) 428-0937

Referral of SBA debts to the U.S. Department of Justice for Litigation

Book a Consultation Call

Referral of SBA debts to the U.S. Department of Justice for Litigation

 

The transcript of the video follows below for further review.

Once an SBA loan has been delinquent between 120 days (4 months) and 180 days (6 months), the loan is generally referred to the U.S. Treasury Department’s Bureau of Fiscal Service. 

Treasury will then employ a number of administrative collection tactics to try and collect the debt.  One of the Government’s most powerful weapons is to refer the debt to the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) for litigation . . . and this gives the Government superior leverage against the SBA obligor.

It is important to understand the litigation pro­cess that might threaten an SBA obligor’s assets. Hence, below is an overview of how an SBA claim is proven and enforced when an SBA debt is referred to the DoJ for litigation. 

From the outset of the civil action, the DoJ through the U.S. Attorney’s Office representing the SBA may use a variety of techniques to try to obtain security in an SBA obligor’s assets be­fore the trial has even begun. If the alleged debt is unsecured (e.g., the SBA obligor did not allow the lender of record, CDC or the SBA to place a lien on his personal or real property), the SBA may try, with approval from the court, to “attach” or otherwise create a lien upon the real estate or personal property within the SBA obligor’s control. The DoJ may also seek a “trustee process” to try to obtain a lien over SBA obligor’s tangible and intangible assets, his “goods, effects, and cred­its,” that are held by a third party. The trustee process is primarily used to attach monies held in banks or other financial institutions. The DoJ may even seek a “freeze” injunction in an ef­fort to prevent the SBA obligor from encumbering, transferring or disposing of his assets during the pendency of the case.

The DoJ can employ these pre-trial security tools both to create security in the SBA obligor’s property should judgment eventu­ally enter for the SBA, and to put pressure on the alleged SBA debtor to settle. However, several types of property are exempt from attachment and trustee process. Moreover, before the SBA will be able to establish these types of liens, it will need to meet certain legal standards in order to gain court approval. In most cases, an SBA defendant will be notified that the SBA is seeking a trustee process or is attempting to attach his property and will have an opportunity to contest its efforts. Occasionally (although rarely), the SBA may be permitted to attach a defendant’s property or be granted trustee process without advance notice to the defendant if the SBA can demonstrate that the defendant is likely to transfer, convey, or conceal the property if notified in advance of the attach­ment.

Once a complaint is filed and any attachment efforts are resolved, the suit will then proceed into a “pretrial” or “discovery” phase. During the discovery phase, each party to the litigation attempts to learn as much as he can about the other party’s case. This process involves document requests, interrogatories (written questions), re­quests for admissions (written questions requiring positive affirma­tion or denial), and the taking of “depositions,” which involves di­rect questioning, under oath, of persons having knowledge about the facts forming the basis of the lawsuit (whether or not they are parties to the lawsuit). A transcript is generally made at most depositions. Any party to the litigation is generally free to have coun­sel present to ask questions of the person being deposed. Deposi­tions are generally taken of each party and his key witnesses. In a suit against an SBA debtor, the DoJ’s Assistant U.S. Attorney would normally take depositions. Counsel representing the SBA debtor will reciprocate with depositions of the SBA’s relevant witnesses.

During the discovery process, each party will also prepare his own case and marshal his own witnesses. It can take as much as a couple of years to proceed through the discovery phase and reach the trial stage.  However, cases with no disputed factual issues, can be resolved much more quickly, and sometimes without a trial.

Assuming the entire case is not dismissed before trial, it will either be settled, won on a summary judgment motion or proceed to trial before a federal judge or magistrate as most SBA obligors generally waive their right to a jury when they initially executed the Unconditional Guarantee as part of the SBA loan process.

The discovery process is designed to insure that all parties have had an opportunity to ascertain all of the relevant facts in the case prior to trial. Ideally, the process facilitates final disposition or settlement. At its worst, the discovery process can be used to intimidate a party into settlement by imposing prohibitive pretrial costs.

After a trial, the judge or magistrate will render a decision. The court decree or order incorporating this decision is called a “judgment.” A judgment against an SBA defendant may also include a monetary damage award for which he is responsible. Pre-judgment inter­est, which in most cases is calculated from the date of the filing of the original civil action, will also be added to the total judgment amount. The losing party will be given the statutory time frame to file an appeal with an appellate court from the entry of judgment against him if he believes that the judge or magistrate in the trial court committed a serious error. The filing of the appeal stays the enforcement of the judgment, but does not stay the accumulation of interest on the judgment if it is upheld. The appeal process in court can take additional time. Many cases are settled during the appeal process because (a) the SBA, if it has won, wants the money sooner rather than later and is not willing to risk a reversal of its favorable verdict in the trial court on appeal, and (b) the defendant, if he has lost, is con­cerned that he may not be able to obtain a reversal of the adverse judgment.

After all appeals are exhausted and barring settlement, a final judg­ment is entered in the trial court. In this typical case, it has taken several years to get to this point. The successful SBA plaintiff can then obtain what is called an “execution” on the judg­ment from the court. The execution is an order by the court to the sheriff to enforce the judgment by seizing and selling, if necessary, assets of the SBA defendant sufficient to pay the judgment. At this point, the SBA plaintiff becomes what is known as a “judgment creditor.”

If an SBA defendant/debtor refuses to pay a judgment after service of an execution by the sheriff, the judgment creditor can use the execution to “levy and sell” the SBA defendant’s real or personal property. This is typically done through a “sheriff’s sale.”

If an SBA defendant refuses or fails to pay a judgment, the SBA judgment credi­tor can conduct post-trial discovery (interrogatories, document re­quests, requests for admissions, and depositions) in order to locate the defendant/debtor’s assets. Moreover, through a procedure called “supplementary process” the SBA judgment creditor can bring the SBA defendant/debtor before the court to question him with regard to his assets, income, transfers of property, and the like. The court can order the SBA defendant to deliver property to the judg­ment creditor, execute papers for the conveyance of property, or make periodic payments in satisfaction of the judgment. Attendance at supplementary process proceedings is enforceable by arrest. Failure to obey any supplementary process order of a court constitutes a contempt of court punishable by imprisonment or other penalty.

In most cases, an SBA judgment creditor generally has twenty years to collect on a judgment. An SBA defendant can be brought into court for additional supplementary process proceedings as long as the federal judgment remains unsatisfied.  Note that the SBA can renew a federal judgment in increments of 20 years.

If you are facing an SBA loan default or a Treasury/Bureau of Fiscal Service debt problem that has been referred to a Private Collection Agency, contact us today for a consultation with an experienced attorney at 888-756-9969

We can analyze your SBA loan, Treasury/BFS debt or Private Collection Agency problem  and advise you on potential solutions.

Why Hire Us to Help You with Your Treasury or SBA Debt Problems?

construction accident injury lawyer

Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure

slip and fall attorney

Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements

truck accident injury attorney

Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.

$680,000 SBA COVID-EIDL LOAN - SBA OHA LITIGATION

$680,000 SBA COVID-EIDL LOAN - SBA OHA LITIGATION

Small business sole proprietor obtained an SBA COVID-EIDL loan for $500,000. Client defaulted causing SBA to charge-off the loan, accelerate the balance and refer the debt to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service for aggressive collection. Treasury added $180,000 in collection fees totaling $680,000+. Client tried to negotiate with Treasury but was only offered a 3-year or 10-year repayment plan. Client hired the Firm to represent before the SBA, Treasury and a Private Collection Agency.  After securing government records through discovery and reviewing them, we filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) court challenging the SBA's referral of the debt to Treasury citing a host of purported violations. The Firm was able to negotiate a reinstatement and recall of the loan back to the SBA, participation in the Hardship Accommodation Plan, termination of Treasury's enforced collection and removal of the statutory collection fees.

$310,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM WORKOUT

$310,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM WORKOUT

Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan for $100,000 from the lender. The SBA loan went into early default in 2006 less than 12 months from disbursement. The SBA paid the 7(a) guaranty monies to the lender and subsequently acquired the deficiency balance of about $96,000, including the right to collect against the guarantor. However, the SBA sent the Official 60-Day Due Process Notice to the Client's defunct business address instead of his personal residence, which he never received. As a result, the debt was transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service where substantial collection fees were assessed, including accrued interest per the promissory note. Treasury eventually referred the debt to a Private Collection Agency (PCA) - Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. Pioneer sent a demand letter claiming a debt balance of almost $310,000 - a shocking 223% increase from the original loan amount assigned to the SBA. Client's social security disability benefits were seized through the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). Client hired the Firm to represent him as the debt continued to snowball despite seizure of his social security benefits and federal tax refunds as the involuntary payments were first applied to Treasury's collection fees, then to accrued interest with minimal allocation to the SBA principal balance.

We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute (CSD) challenging the referral of the debt to Treasury based on the defective notice sent to the defunct business address. Despite overwhelming evidence proving a violation of the Client's Due Process rights, the SBA still rejected the CSD. As a result, an Appeals Petition was filed with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) Court challenging the SBA decision and its certification the debt was legally enforceable in the amount claimed. After several months of litigation before the SBA OHA Court, our Firm Attorney successfully negotiated an Offer in Compromise (OIC) Term Workout with the SBA Supervising Trial Attorney for $82,000 spread over a term of 74 months at a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Client an estimated $241,000 in Treasury collection fees, accrued interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)), and the PCA contingency fee.

$150,000 SBA 7A LOAN - NEGOTIATED WORKOUT AGREEMENT

$150,000 SBA 7A LOAN - NEGOTIATED WORKOUT AGREEMENT

The client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000. His business revenue decreased significantly causing default and an accelerated balance of $143,000. The client received the SBA's Official 60-day notice with the debt scheduled for referral to the Treasury’s Bureau of Fiscal Service for aggressive collection in less than 26 days. We were hired to represent him, respond to the SBA's Official 60-day notice, and prevent enforced collection by the Treasury and the Department of Justice. We successfully negotiated a structured workout with an extended maturity date that included a reduction of the 14% interest rate and removal of substantial collection fees (30% of the loan balance), effectively saving the client over $242,000.

Read more Case Results

Related Content

Read more sba debt articles