Explanation of the Act: Navigating the Complete COVID Collections Act
Dive into the Complete COVID Collections Act for insights on pandemic loan collections, financial recovery, and legal compliance. Stay informed today!
Discover who qualifies for relief under the Complete COVID Collections Act. Explore eligibility, legal insights, and navigate requirements for small businesses today.

What does the Complete COVID Collections Act mean for those seeking financial relief? As a seasoned Federal Debt Default lawyer at the Protect Law Group Firm, I will provide you with an in-depth understanding of the Complete COVID Collections Act from a legal standpoint. This article will explore the eligibility criteria for relief, the critical components of the act, and what it means for small businesses impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. With the intricate details of this legislative measure, small business owners and stakeholders can better navigate the requirements and implications of the law.
The Complete COVID Collections Act introduces a structured framework to ensure that collections on COVID-19-related loans are neither paused nor interrupted. Its provisions are rooted in a desire to maintain financial accountability and secure a smooth recovery from the economic turmoil induced by the pandemic.
The Act incorporates several key elements designed to maintain orderliness in loan collection processes and enforce accountability. Here's a breakdown of these components:

Under this legislation, collections on loans guaranteed by certain provisions of the Small Business Act due to the pandemic cannot be suspended. This mandates continued collection activities to prevent defaults and ensure financial accountability. Such provisions are vital to preserving the integrity of the funds disbursed to assist businesses.
Another significant aspect of the Act is the requirement for the Small Business Administration (SBA) to refer claims related to loans under $100,000 to the Department of the Treasury. This referral signals an added layer of governmental oversight aimed at efficient recovery and management of public funds.
The SBA Administrator must provide monthly briefings to Congress on loan collection progress and related activities. This ensures legislative oversight and keeps elected officials informed about the current status of collections and any unforeseen challenges.
A pivotal aspect of this legislation involves fraud enforcement. There is a 10-year statute of limitations for initiating criminal or civil actions linked to fraud associated with any COVID-19 relief-related loan or grant. This lengthy timeframe highlights the government's commitment to pursuing fraudulent activities long-term and deterring deceitful practices.
Transparency is integral to this Act, with a requirement placed on the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee to maintain real-time data about funds recovered by the Federal Government. This provision promotes openness and allows stakeholders to trace the allocation and recovery of funds efficiently.
To fully grasp the implications of the Complete COVID Collections Act, we must first understand the critical definitions that guide the Act's applicability and enforcement.
A covered loan includes loans guaranteed under specified sections of the Small Business Act and ones associated with economic injury due to COVID-19. The scope of these loans extends beyond the ordinary lending frameworks to encompass the extraordinary assistance provided during the pandemic.
The term "covered programs" encompasses various loan and grant programs introduced through COVID-19 relief legislation. This includes the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), as well as grants aimed at supporting shuttered venues and restaurants, among others.
The Act outlines essential oversight and reporting requirements to ensure compliance and bolster accountability.
Coordination between the SBA and the Inspector General is apparent through permitted inspections and reports, which ensure thorough reporting and oversight. This collaborative effort supports the integrity and accuracy of reports related to COVID-19 relief programs.
The Act obligates the Attorney General to provide monthly reports to Congress detailing activities and prosecutions concerning covered programs. This includes enforcement metrics, which offer a lens into the compliance and legal actions taking place.
Understanding the legislative intent behind the Complete COVID Collections Act is crucial for appreciating its implications on financial relief and accountability.
The Act's primary aim is to maintain financial accountability while ensuring the recovery framework for COVID-19 remains stable. By codifying regulations for collections on loans and enacting oversight measures, it supports long-term economic resilience.
The eligibility for relief under this legislation is inextricably linked to compliance with the stipulated provisions, financial transparency, and accountability.
Businesses that demonstrate adherence to the Act's provisions and those partaking in covered programs may qualify for relief. These entities must ensure their financial dealings align with the specific requirements outlined, displaying conformity and lawful conduct.
Compliant businesses are required to follow specified guidelines concerning loan usage, reporting, and collection participation. Non-compliance can lead to legal repercussions, making awareness of these obligations critical.
The Complete COVID Collections Act presents a formidable legal structure designed to evaluate how loan collections are managed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
For small businesses, navigating the complexities of this Act involves understanding its core elements and compliance requirements to leverage potential relief opportunities. The Act emphasizes the importance of robust financial management, which can profoundly impact eligibility.
From a legal perspective, non-compliance can bear severe consequences, underscoring the need for meticulous adherence to legislative guidelines. The emphasis on fraud detection and reporting ushers in a new level of scrutiny and accountability.
The Complete COVID Collections Act defines a clear pathway for maintaining financial discipline and supporting a post-COVID-19 economic resurgence. By understanding your responsibilities under the Act, you can ensure compliance with regulations and potentially access eligible relief. This legislative framework underscores the necessity of continued vigilance and accountability as we navigate the path toward recovery.

Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan for $100,000 from the lender. The SBA loan went into early default in 2006 less than 12 months from disbursement. The SBA paid the 7(a) guaranty monies to the lender and subsequently acquired the deficiency balance of about $96,000, including the right to collect against the guarantor. However, the SBA sent the Official 60-Day Due Process Notice to the Client's defunct business address instead of his personal residence, which he never received. As a result, the debt was transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service where substantial collection fees were assessed, including accrued interest per the promissory note. Treasury eventually referred the debt to a Private Collection Agency (PCA) - Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. Pioneer sent a demand letter claiming a debt balance of almost $310,000 - a shocking 223% increase from the original loan amount assigned to the SBA. Client's social security disability benefits were seized through the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). Client hired the Firm to represent him as the debt continued to snowball despite seizure of his social security benefits and federal tax refunds as the involuntary payments were first applied to Treasury's collection fees, then to accrued interest with minimal allocation to the SBA principal balance.
We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute (CSD) challenging the referral of the debt to Treasury based on the defective notice sent to the defunct business address. Despite overwhelming evidence proving a violation of the Client's Due Process rights, the SBA still rejected the CSD. As a result, an Appeals Petition was filed with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) Court challenging the SBA decision and its certification the debt was legally enforceable in the amount claimed. After several months of litigation before the SBA OHA Court, our Firm Attorney successfully negotiated an Offer in Compromise (OIC) Term Workout with the SBA Supervising Trial Attorney for $82,000 spread over a term of 74 months at a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Client an estimated $241,000 in Treasury collection fees, accrued interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)), and the PCA contingency fee.

Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $324,000 to buy a small business and its facility. The business and real estate had an appraisal value of $318,000 at the time of purchase. The business ultimately failed but the participating lender abandoned the business equipment and real estate collateral even though it had valid security liens. As a result, the lender recouped nearly nothing from the pledged collateral, leaving the business owners liable for the deficiency balance. The SBA paid the lender the 7(a) guaranty money and was assigned ownership of the debt, including the right to collect. However, the clients never received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and were denied the opportunity to negotiate an Offer in Compromise (OIC) or a Workout directly with the SBA before being transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service, which added an additional $80,000 in collection fees. Treasury garnished and offset the clients' wages, federal salary and social security benefits. When the clients tried to negotiate with Treasury by themselves, they were offered an unaffordable repayment plan which would have caused severe financial hardship. Clients subsequently hired the Firm to litigate an Appeals Petition before the SBA Office & Hearings Appeals (OHA) challenging the legal enforceability and amount of the debt. The Firm successfully negotiated a term OIC that was approved by the SBA Office of General Counsel, saving the clients approximately $205,000.

Clients executed several trust deeds pledging seven (7) real estate properties and unconditional personal guarantees for an SBA 7(a) loan from the participating lender. The clients' small business failed and eventually defaulted on repayment of the loan exposing all collateral pledged by the clients. The SBA subsequently acquired the loan balance from the lender, including the right to liquidate and collect all pledged collateral pursuant to the trust deed instruments.
The Firm was hired to negotiate separate release of lien proposals for all 7 real estate properties. In preparation for the work assignment, the Firm Attorneys initiated discovery to secure records from the SBA and Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service. After reviewing the records and understanding the interplay between the lender and the SBA, the attorneys then prepared, submitted and negotiated the release of lien (ROL) for each of the 7 real estate properties for consideration.
After submitting the proposals, the assigned SBA Loan Specialists approved each ROL package - significantly reducing the total SBA debt claimed.