If you Owe more than $30,000 contact us for a case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
contact us for a free case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
Call us (833) 428-0937

Potential Impact on Borrowers and Lenders Amid COVID Collections Act Provisions

Explore how the COVID Collections Act impacts borrowers and lenders. Gain insights on legislative provisions affecting loan collections and financial accountability.

Schedule a Consultation

Have you ever pondered how legislative provisions, especially those concerning loan collections amid unprecedented global events, impact borrowers and lenders? The Complete COVID Collections Act presents a framework aiming to balance the ongoing recovery of small businesses with the accountability of financial aid disbursement. As a professional with significant experience navigating federal debt default cases at the Protect Law Group Firm, I offer a comprehensive analysis of this legislation, specifically focusing on its ramifications for both borrowers and lenders.

Potential Impact on Borrowers and Lenders Amid COVID Collections Act Provisions
Loan Collection During COVID-19

The Complete COVID Collections Act

The Complete COVID Collections Act is pivotal in establishing clear guidelines for the collection of loans related to the COVID-19 pandemic. It primarily targets loans granted under specific sections of the Small Business Act, aiming to safeguard the financial recovery framework set by COVID-19 relief programs. This legislation is timely, given the global economic downturn induced by the pandemic, and is crucial in managing and maintaining the financial integrity of small businesses.

Provisions of the Bill

The bill outlines several critical components, each tailored to manage the delicate balance between supporting businesses and ensuring accountability in financial aid allocation.

Loan Collection During COVID-19

The Act prohibits the suspension of loan collections guaranteed by the Small Business Act as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. This provision underscores the importance of financial discipline and recovery, ensuring that pandemic-related loans continue to contribute to economic stability. For borrowers, this makes it imperative to maintain a strategic approach to loan repayment, while for lenders, it reinforces the necessity of sound collection practices.

Referral of Claims

For loans under $100,000, the bill stipulates that claims for collection must be referred by the Small Business Administration (SBA) to the Department of the Treasury. This ensures a structured approach to handling smaller loans, facilitating smoother enforcement and reducing the financial burden on both borrowers and lenders.

Monthly Updates

The SBA Administrator is tasked with providing monthly briefings to Congress regarding the status and progress of loan collections. This requirement ensures transparency and accountability, providing a consistent update to legislative bodies about the effectiveness of the provisions related to pandemic relief loans.

Fraud Enforcement

A critical aspect of this legislation is the establishment of a 10-year statute of limitations for initiating criminal or civil actions in cases of fraud related to COVID-19 relief loans or grants. This provision is crucial in maintaining the integrity of financial aid programs by deterring potential fraudulent activities.

Data Transparency

To enhance accountability, the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee is required to maintain real-time data regarding the recovery of funds by the Federal government. This transparency is pivotal for both lenders and borrowers, as it provides a clear view of recovery efforts and highlights accountability measures within the financial aid framework.

Key Definitions

A thorough understanding of the terminology used in the Complete COVID Collections Act is essential for both borrowers and lenders, facilitating clarity in the interpretation of provisions.

Covered Loan

The term "Covered Loan" refers to loans guaranteed under specific provisions of the Small Business Act or those related to COVID-19 economic injury. Comprehension of this definition allows lenders to identify applicable loans accurately, ensuring compliance with the Act’s guidelines.

Covered Programs

These programs include a variety of loan and grant initiatives put in place under COVID-19 relief legislation, such as the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and grants aimed at aiding shuttered venues and restaurants. Both borrowers and lenders must grasp the scope of these programs to leverage the intended benefits effectively and align with legislative expectations.

Oversight and Reporting

Monitoring and reporting mechanisms imbued within the Act are crucial for its successful implementation, ensuring that the legislation achieves its intended outcomes regarding financial accountability and recovery.

Inspections and Reports

The Act allows for enhanced coordination between the SBA and the Inspector General. This coordination aims to improve the accuracy of reporting and oversight of COVID-19 relief programs. For lenders, these inspections ensure that lending practices align with federal expectations, while borrowers benefit from increased oversight protecting their interests.

Monthly Reports from Attorney General

The Attorney General is mandated to provide Congress with monthly reports concerning prosecutions related to covered programs. This provision draws a line against fraudulent activities, reinforcing enforcement actions, and maintaining judicial integrity within the financial aid framework.

Legislative Intent

Understanding the legislative intent behind the Complete COVID Collections Act offers insights into the broader objectives that Congress aims to achieve through this legislation. The primary intent is to maintain stringent financial accountability for loans provided during the pandemic, thus supporting a stable recovery framework for small businesses.

Potential Impacts on Borrowers and Lenders

In examining the practical implications, the legislation’s impact on borrowers and lenders warrants a detailed exploration of both opportunities and challenges present.

Impacts on Borrowers

For borrowers, the enactment of this bill emphasizes the importance of adhering to the repayment schedules of pandemic-related loans. Restricting the suspension of loan collections ensures that businesses continue contributing to the economic recovery while maintaining financial discipline. Borrowers are urged to engage in active financial planning, assessing their ability to meet loan obligations without deterring their operational viability.

Impacts on Lenders

Lenders, on the other hand, gain from clearly defined collection processes and referrals of claims to the Department of the Treasury. These processes streamline collections, aiding lenders in recouping funds tied to pandemic-related loans efficiently. Moreover, the provisions against fraud bolster lenders' confidence in participating in loan programs under the Act, safeguarding against unwarranted financial losses.

Navigating Challenges

Both lenders and borrowers may encounter challenges under the imposed guidelines. Borrowers must strategize to balance loan payments with ongoing operational demands, a scenario demanding prudent financial planning and possibly renegotiating terms when feasible. Lenders are tasked with upholding compliance with legislative provisions while deploying empathetic collection strategies amidst ongoing economic recovery.

Conclusion

The Complete COVID Collections Act establishes a robust framework directing loan collection practices for pandemic-related financial assistance. Through stringent oversight, transparency, and clearly defined provisions, it seeks to uphold financial discipline while fostering an environment conducive to economic recovery. For borrowers and lenders, understanding and navigating the Act's provisions is crucial in adapting to the evolving dynamics of pandemic recovery financing. As such, both parties are encouraged to engage with legal and financial advisors to adequately address the implications of this pivotal legislation.

$391,000 SBA COVID EIDL - CROSS-SERVICING DISPUTE | NEGOTIATED REINSTATEMENT & WORKOUT

$391,000 SBA COVID EIDL - CROSS-SERVICING DISPUTE | NEGOTIATED REINSTATEMENT & WORKOUT

Client's small business obtained an SBA COVID EIDL for $301,000 pledging collateral by executing the Note, Unconditional Guarantee and Security Agreement.  The business defaulted on the loan and the SBA CESC called the Note and Guarantee, accelerated the principal balance due, accrued interest and retracted the 30-year term schedule.  

The loan was transferred to the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service which resulted in the statutory addition of $90,000+ in administrative fees, costs, penalties and interest with the total debt now at $391.000+. Treasury also initiated a Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against the client's federal contractor payments for the full amount each month - intercepting all of its revenue and pushing the business to the brink of bankruptcy.

The Firm was hired to investigate and find an alternate solution to the bankruptcy option.  After submitting formal production requests for all government records, it was discovered that the SBA failed to send the required Official 60-Day Pre-Referral Notice to the borrower and guarantor prior to referring the debt to Treasury. This procedural due process violation served as the basis to submit a Cross-Servicing Dispute to recall the debt from Treasury back to the SBA and to negotiate a reinstatement of the original 30-year maturity date, a modified workout, cessation of the TOP levy against the federal contractor payments and removal of the $90,000+ Treasury-based collection fees, interest and penalties.

‍

‍

$310,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM WORKOUT

$310,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM WORKOUT

Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan for $100,000 from the lender. The SBA loan went into early default in 2006 less than 12 months from disbursement. The SBA paid the 7(a) guaranty monies to the lender and subsequently acquired the deficiency balance of about $96,000, including the right to collect against the guarantor. However, the SBA sent the Official 60-Day Due Process Notice to the Client's defunct business address instead of his personal residence, which he never received. As a result, the debt was transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service where substantial collection fees were assessed, including accrued interest per the promissory note. Treasury eventually referred the debt to a Private Collection Agency (PCA) - Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. Pioneer sent a demand letter claiming a debt balance of almost $310,000 - a shocking 223% increase from the original loan amount assigned to the SBA. Client's social security disability benefits were seized through the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). Client hired the Firm to represent him as the debt continued to snowball despite seizure of his social security benefits and federal tax refunds as the involuntary payments were first applied to Treasury's collection fees, then to accrued interest with minimal allocation to the SBA principal balance.

We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute (CSD) challenging the referral of the debt to Treasury based on the defective notice sent to the defunct business address. Despite overwhelming evidence proving a violation of the Client's Due Process rights, the SBA still rejected the CSD. As a result, an Appeals Petition was filed with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) Court challenging the SBA decision and its certification the debt was legally enforceable in the amount claimed. After several months of litigation before the SBA OHA Court, our Firm Attorney successfully negotiated an Offer in Compromise (OIC) Term Workout with the SBA Supervising Trial Attorney for $82,000 spread over a term of 74 months at a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Client an estimated $241,000 in Treasury collection fees, accrued interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)), and the PCA contingency fee.

‍

‍

$50,000 SBA 7A LOAN - RESPONSE TO SBA OFFICIAL 60-DAY NOTICE

$50,000 SBA 7A LOAN - RESPONSE TO SBA OFFICIAL 60-DAY NOTICE

Client received the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice for a loan that was obtained by her small business in 2001.  The SBA loan went into default in 2004 but after hearing nothing from the SBA lender or the SBA for 20 years, out of the blue, she received the SBA's collection due process notice which provided her with only one of four options: (1) repay the entire accelerated balance immediately; (2) negotiate a repayment arrangement; (3) challenge the legal enforceability of the debt with evidence; or (4) request an OHA hearing before a U.S. Administrative Law Judge.

Client hired the Firm to represent her with only 13 days left before the expiration deadline to respond to the SBA's Official 60-Day Notice.  The Firm attorneys immediately researched the SBA's Official loan database to obtain information regarding the 7(a) loan.  Thereafter, the Firm attorneys conducted legal research and asserted certain affirmative defenses challenging the legal enforceability of the debt.  A written response was timely filed to the 60-Day Notice with the SBA subsequently agreeing with the client's affirmative defenses and legal arguments.  As a result, the SBA rendered a decision immediately terminating collection of the debt against the client's alleged personal guarantee liability saving her $50,000.

Read more Case Results
Providing real solutions to individuals who are facing SBA loan problems. Contact one of our experienced SBA Attorneys and Federal Agency Practitioners today for a Case Evaluation - (833) 428-0937.
©2021 Protect Law Group, All Rights Reserved.Design by T. Walker Consulting, Inc.