If you Owe more than $30,000 contact us for a case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
contact us for a free case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
Call us (833) 428-0937

Potential Impact on Borrowers and Lenders Amid COVID Collections Act Provisions

Explore how the COVID Collections Act impacts borrowers and lenders. Gain insights on legislative provisions affecting loan collections and financial accountability.

Schedule a Consultation

Have you ever pondered how legislative provisions, especially those concerning loan collections amid unprecedented global events, impact borrowers and lenders? The Complete COVID Collections Act presents a framework aiming to balance the ongoing recovery of small businesses with the accountability of financial aid disbursement. As a professional with significant experience navigating federal debt default cases at the Protect Law Group Firm, I offer a comprehensive analysis of this legislation, specifically focusing on its ramifications for both borrowers and lenders.

Potential Impact on Borrowers and Lenders Amid COVID Collections Act Provisions
Loan Collection During COVID-19

The Complete COVID Collections Act

The Complete COVID Collections Act is pivotal in establishing clear guidelines for the collection of loans related to the COVID-19 pandemic. It primarily targets loans granted under specific sections of the Small Business Act, aiming to safeguard the financial recovery framework set by COVID-19 relief programs. This legislation is timely, given the global economic downturn induced by the pandemic, and is crucial in managing and maintaining the financial integrity of small businesses.

Provisions of the Bill

The bill outlines several critical components, each tailored to manage the delicate balance between supporting businesses and ensuring accountability in financial aid allocation.

Loan Collection During COVID-19

The Act prohibits the suspension of loan collections guaranteed by the Small Business Act as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. This provision underscores the importance of financial discipline and recovery, ensuring that pandemic-related loans continue to contribute to economic stability. For borrowers, this makes it imperative to maintain a strategic approach to loan repayment, while for lenders, it reinforces the necessity of sound collection practices.

Referral of Claims

For loans under $100,000, the bill stipulates that claims for collection must be referred by the Small Business Administration (SBA) to the Department of the Treasury. This ensures a structured approach to handling smaller loans, facilitating smoother enforcement and reducing the financial burden on both borrowers and lenders.

Monthly Updates

The SBA Administrator is tasked with providing monthly briefings to Congress regarding the status and progress of loan collections. This requirement ensures transparency and accountability, providing a consistent update to legislative bodies about the effectiveness of the provisions related to pandemic relief loans.

Fraud Enforcement

A critical aspect of this legislation is the establishment of a 10-year statute of limitations for initiating criminal or civil actions in cases of fraud related to COVID-19 relief loans or grants. This provision is crucial in maintaining the integrity of financial aid programs by deterring potential fraudulent activities.

Data Transparency

To enhance accountability, the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee is required to maintain real-time data regarding the recovery of funds by the Federal government. This transparency is pivotal for both lenders and borrowers, as it provides a clear view of recovery efforts and highlights accountability measures within the financial aid framework.

Key Definitions

A thorough understanding of the terminology used in the Complete COVID Collections Act is essential for both borrowers and lenders, facilitating clarity in the interpretation of provisions.

Covered Loan

The term "Covered Loan" refers to loans guaranteed under specific provisions of the Small Business Act or those related to COVID-19 economic injury. Comprehension of this definition allows lenders to identify applicable loans accurately, ensuring compliance with the Act’s guidelines.

Covered Programs

These programs include a variety of loan and grant initiatives put in place under COVID-19 relief legislation, such as the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and grants aimed at aiding shuttered venues and restaurants. Both borrowers and lenders must grasp the scope of these programs to leverage the intended benefits effectively and align with legislative expectations.

Oversight and Reporting

Monitoring and reporting mechanisms imbued within the Act are crucial for its successful implementation, ensuring that the legislation achieves its intended outcomes regarding financial accountability and recovery.

Inspections and Reports

The Act allows for enhanced coordination between the SBA and the Inspector General. This coordination aims to improve the accuracy of reporting and oversight of COVID-19 relief programs. For lenders, these inspections ensure that lending practices align with federal expectations, while borrowers benefit from increased oversight protecting their interests.

Monthly Reports from Attorney General

The Attorney General is mandated to provide Congress with monthly reports concerning prosecutions related to covered programs. This provision draws a line against fraudulent activities, reinforcing enforcement actions, and maintaining judicial integrity within the financial aid framework.

Legislative Intent

Understanding the legislative intent behind the Complete COVID Collections Act offers insights into the broader objectives that Congress aims to achieve through this legislation. The primary intent is to maintain stringent financial accountability for loans provided during the pandemic, thus supporting a stable recovery framework for small businesses.

Potential Impacts on Borrowers and Lenders

In examining the practical implications, the legislation’s impact on borrowers and lenders warrants a detailed exploration of both opportunities and challenges present.

Impacts on Borrowers

For borrowers, the enactment of this bill emphasizes the importance of adhering to the repayment schedules of pandemic-related loans. Restricting the suspension of loan collections ensures that businesses continue contributing to the economic recovery while maintaining financial discipline. Borrowers are urged to engage in active financial planning, assessing their ability to meet loan obligations without deterring their operational viability.

Impacts on Lenders

Lenders, on the other hand, gain from clearly defined collection processes and referrals of claims to the Department of the Treasury. These processes streamline collections, aiding lenders in recouping funds tied to pandemic-related loans efficiently. Moreover, the provisions against fraud bolster lenders' confidence in participating in loan programs under the Act, safeguarding against unwarranted financial losses.

Navigating Challenges

Both lenders and borrowers may encounter challenges under the imposed guidelines. Borrowers must strategize to balance loan payments with ongoing operational demands, a scenario demanding prudent financial planning and possibly renegotiating terms when feasible. Lenders are tasked with upholding compliance with legislative provisions while deploying empathetic collection strategies amidst ongoing economic recovery.

Conclusion

The Complete COVID Collections Act establishes a robust framework directing loan collection practices for pandemic-related financial assistance. Through stringent oversight, transparency, and clearly defined provisions, it seeks to uphold financial discipline while fostering an environment conducive to economic recovery. For borrowers and lenders, understanding and navigating the Act's provisions is crucial in adapting to the evolving dynamics of pandemic recovery financing. As such, both parties are encouraged to engage with legal and financial advisors to adequately address the implications of this pivotal legislation.

Frequently Asked Questions

$310,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM WORKOUT

$310,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC TERM WORKOUT

Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan for $100,000 from the lender. The SBA loan went into early default in 2006 less than 12 months from disbursement. The SBA paid the 7(a) guaranty monies to the lender and subsequently acquired the deficiency balance of about $96,000, including the right to collect against the guarantor. However, the SBA sent the Official 60-Day Due Process Notice to the Client's defunct business address instead of his personal residence, which he never received. As a result, the debt was transferred to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service where substantial collection fees were assessed, including accrued interest per the promissory note. Treasury eventually referred the debt to a Private Collection Agency (PCA) - Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. Pioneer sent a demand letter claiming a debt balance of almost $310,000 - a shocking 223% increase from the original loan amount assigned to the SBA. Client's social security disability benefits were seized through the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). Client hired the Firm to represent him as the debt continued to snowball despite seizure of his social security benefits and federal tax refunds as the involuntary payments were first applied to Treasury's collection fees, then to accrued interest with minimal allocation to the SBA principal balance.

We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute (CSD) challenging the referral of the debt to Treasury based on the defective notice sent to the defunct business address. Despite overwhelming evidence proving a violation of the Client's Due Process rights, the SBA still rejected the CSD. As a result, an Appeals Petition was filed with the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals (OHA) Court challenging the SBA decision and its certification the debt was legally enforceable in the amount claimed. After several months of litigation before the SBA OHA Court, our Firm Attorney successfully negotiated an Offer in Compromise (OIC) Term Workout with the SBA Supervising Trial Attorney for $82,000 spread over a term of 74 months at a significantly reduced interest rate saving the Client an estimated $241,000 in Treasury collection fees, accrued interest (contract interest rate and Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)), and the PCA contingency fee.

$58,000 SBA 7A LOAN - AWG HEARING DEFENSE

$58,000 SBA 7A LOAN - AWG HEARING DEFENSE

Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan balance of $58,000.  The client received a notice of Intent to initiate Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG) Proceedings.  We represented the client at the hearing and successfully defeated the AWG Order based on several legal and equitable grounds.

$150,000 SBA 7A LOAN – NEGOTIATED WORKOUT AGREEMENT

$150,000 SBA 7A LOAN – NEGOTIATED WORKOUT AGREEMENT

Client’s small business obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for $150,000.  He and his wife signed personal guarantees and pledged their home as collateral. The SBA loan went into default, the term or maturity date was accelerated and demand for payment of the entire amount claimed was made.  The SBA lender’s note gave it the right to adjust the default interest rate from 7.25% to 18% per annum. The business filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy but was dismissed after 3 years due to its inability to continue with payments under the plan. Clients wanted to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which would have been a mistake as their home had significant equity to repay the SBA loan balance in full as the Trustee would likely seize and sell the home to repay the secured and unsecured creditors. However, the SBA lender opted to pursue the SBA 7(a) Guaranty and subsequently assigned the loan and the right to enforce collection to the SBA. Clients then received the SBA Official 60-Day Notice and hired the Firm to respond to it and negotiate on their behalf. Clients disputed the SBA’s alleged balance of $148,000, as several payments made to the SBA lender during the Chapter 11 reorganization were not accounted for. To challenge the SBA’s claimed debt balance, the Firm Attorneys initiated expedited discovery to obtain government records. SBA records disclosed the true amount owed was about $97,000. Moreover, because the Clients’ home had significant equity, they were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise or an immediate Release of Lien for Consideration, despite being incorrectly advised by non-attorney consulting companies that they were. Instead, our Firm Attorneys recommended a Workout of $97,000 spread over a lengthy term and a waiver of the applicable interest rate making the monthly payment affordable. After back and forth negotiations, SBA approved the Workout proposal, thereby saving the home from imminent foreclosure and reducing the Clients' liability by nearly $81,000 in incorrect principal balance, accrued interest, and statutory collection fees.

Read more Case Results
Providing real solutions to individuals who are facing SBA loan problems. Contact one of our experienced SBA Attorneys and Federal Agency Practitioners today for a Case Evaluation - (833) 428-0937.
©2021 Protect Law Group, All Rights Reserved.Design by T. Walker Consulting, Inc.