If you Owe more than $30,000 contact us for a case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
contact us for a free case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
Call us (833) 428-0937

How Small‐Dollar Fraud Provides the SBA Powerful Leverage though the SBA OIG’s Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA) That Can Cost SBA Lenders, Borrowers, and Guarantors Up To $1 Million

How Small‐Dollar Fraud Provides the SBA Powerful Leverage though the SBA OIG’s Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA) Muscle That Can Cost SBA Lenders, Borrowers, and Guarantors Up To $1 Million

Book a Consultation Call

How Small‐Dollar Fraud Provides the SBA Powerful Leverage though the SBA OIG’s Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA) That Can Cost SBA Lenders, Borrowers, and Guarantors Up To $1 Million

Why the SBA Loan and Debt Playbook Changed

On December 23, 2024, Congress super-charged an obscure statute—the Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA)—when it passed the FY 2025 National Defense Authorization Act. The amendments raise the cap on administrative cases from $150,000 to $1 million and broaden what counts as a “false claim,” empowering every federal inspector general—including the SBA Office of Inspector General (OIG)—to pursue loan-related fraud or malfeasance even when the Department of Justice (DOJ) says “no thanks.”

More importantly, it should be noted that SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler published her "Day One Memo" confirming SBA plans to aggressively step up collection efforts and audit investigations for COVID loans disbursed due to the pandemic –which can lead to a number of AFCA actions in the near future.

As part of the Trump Administration’s policy to pursue SBA COVID Loan fraud specifically involving PPP and EIDL loans, legislation was introduced in Congress by Republicans to ensure that collections on loans made to small businesses borrowers and guarantors related to the COVID-19 pandemic will no longer be suspended.

Click the following link to learn more about the "Complete COVID Collections Act" that was introduced as a Senate bill and may become federal law in the future: COVID Collections Act

AFCA vs. the Civil False Claims Act: Same Bite, Faster Bark

Feature: Where the case is heard
AFCA (as amended): Administrative hearing before a United States Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) at the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals Court (OHA) or Board of Contract Appeals member
Civil FCA: Federal District Court

Feature: DOJ involvement
AFCA (as amended): DOJ must approve the filing but does not have to prosecute in Federal District Court
Civil FCA: DOJ (or a qui-tam relator) files the suit

Feature: Dollar threshold
AFCA (as amended): ≤ $1 million per case (indexed for inflation)
Civil FCA: No cap

Feature: Penalties
AFCA (as amended): Up to $5,000 per false claim/statement + double damages + investigation costs
Civil FCA: Up to ~$27,000 per claim + treble damages

Feature: Statute of limitations
AFCA (as amended): 6 years from violation or 3 years from discovery (max 10)
Civil FCA: 6–10 years depending on facts

Sources: 31 U.S.C. §§ 3801-3812; FY 2025 NDAA § 5203.

How an AFCA Case Starts Inside SBA

  1. Investigating Official – The SBA OIG assigns special agents to subpoena records and interview witnesses. (Small     Business Administration, eCFR)
  2. Reviewing Official – A senior SBA attorney reviews the OIG’s report to decide whether sufficient evidence supports a charge.
  3. DOJ  Screening – The package goes to DOJ. If DOJ declines to sue under the Civil FCA in Federal District Court, it can green-light SBA to proceed administratively before an ALJ at the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals Court (OHA) or Board of Contract Appeals member.
  4. Administrative Complaint – SBA files before an ALJ; Respondent SBA participating lenders, SBA loan borrowers, obligors or guarantors receive 30 days to file an answer or other responsive pleading.

Hearing & Decision – After discovery and an evidentiary hearing,the presiding ALJ issues findings in a Decision and Order – which can involve the imposition of penalties or dismisses the case. Appeals go to the SBA Administrator and then to the Federal D.C. Circuit pursuant to rights and remedies under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).

Red-Flag Scenarios for SBA Lenders, Borrowers, and Guarantors

Player: 7(a) / CDC Lenders
Potential AFCA Violation:
Certifying that collateral was properly perfected or liquidated in a commercially reasonable manner when it was not
Real-World Example:
Filing an SBA Form 159 indicating all fees were disclosed  when “packaging” fees were hidden

Player: Borrowers
Potential AFCA Violation:
Overstating payroll in a PPP forgiveness application
Real-World Example:
Claiming EIDL funds were used for working capital while  diverting cash to personal real estate or other personal expenses

Player: Guarantors
Potential AFCA Violation: Concealing assets to avoid repayment (reverse false claim)
Real-World Example: Transferring property to a spouse after default but before Treasury offset; Lying about or omitting relevant financial information in financial statements (Form 770), Offer in Compromise(Form 1150) or other pertinent documents submitted under penalty of perjury

Player: Servicers / Purchasers
Potential AFCA Violation: Misreporting liquidation proceeds to maximize the SBA guarantee purchase
Real-World Example: Failing to remit auction proceeds and certifying “no recoveries available"

Because the amended AFCA now covers reverse false claims,hiding assets or under-reporting recoveries can trigger liability even when no new funds are sought. Source: (National Law Review)

Penalties: What’s at Stake

  1. Civil Penalty – Up to $5,000 per false statement or claim (adjusted for inflation).
  2. Damage Multiplier – Up to the amount SBA already paid or credited.
  3. Cost Reimbursement – SBA recoups the OIG’s investigation and litigation costs first.

For a single 7(a) guarantee purchase of $400,000 supported by four false certifications, exposure can exceed $900,000 before interest.

To-Do Action Plans

  1. Tighten  Documentation – Keep source data (payroll reports, bank statements, appraisals) for six years.
  2. Refresh Training – Update staff and borrower on boarding materials to cover AFCA risks.
  3. Audit     Certifications – Double-check Form 172, Form 159, servicing reports, and loan forgiveness packages.
  4. Self-Disclosure – If errors surface, consider a proactive disclosure to SBA OIG before an investigation begins.
  5. Maintain  Guarantor Transparency – Track asset transfers post-default; document valuations.

Takeaway

The AFCA’s $1 million ceiling and broader definitions mean SBA OIG no longer needs to wait for DOJ to chase many PPP, EIDL, Disaster, 7(a)or 504 fraud cases. Small-dollar no longer means small risk. A single inaccurate certification under penalty of perjury can invite an administrative lawsuit before the SBA OHA Court that freezes assets, garnishes Treasury payments, and tarnishes reputations.

If you are an SBA  borrower, or guarantor facing an inquiry—contact the attorneys at SBA-Attorneys.com for a confidential Case Evaluation.

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified SBA-Attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.

Why Hire Us to Help You with Your Treasury or SBA Debt Problems?

construction accident injury lawyer

Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure

slip and fall attorney

Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements

truck accident injury attorney

Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.

$391,000 SBA COVID EIDL - CROSS-SERVICING DISPUTE | NEGOTIATED REINSTATEMENT & WORKOUT

$391,000 SBA COVID EIDL - CROSS-SERVICING DISPUTE | NEGOTIATED REINSTATEMENT & WORKOUT

Client's small business obtained an SBA COVID EIDL for $301,000 pledging collateral by executing the Note, Unconditional Guarantee and Security Agreement.  The business defaulted on the loan and the SBA CESC called the Note and Guarantee, accelerated the principal balance due, accrued interest and retracted the 30-year term schedule.  

The loan was transferred to the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service which resulted in the statutory addition of $90,000+ in administrative fees, costs, penalties and interest with the total debt now at $391.000+. Treasury also initiated a Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against the client's federal contractor payments for the full amount each month - intercepting all of its revenue and pushing the business to the brink of bankruptcy.

The Firm was hired to investigate and find an alternate solution to the bankruptcy option.  After submitting formal production requests for all government records, it was discovered that the SBA failed to send the required Official 60-Day Pre-Referral Notice to the borrower and guarantor prior to referring the debt to Treasury. This procedural due process violation served as the basis to submit a Cross-Servicing Dispute to recall the debt from Treasury back to the SBA and to negotiate a reinstatement of the original 30-year maturity date, a modified workout, cessation of the TOP levy against the federal contractor payments and removal of the $90,000+ Treasury-based collection fees, interest and penalties.

$220,000 SBA 7A LOAN -DOT WAIVER OF ADMINISTRATIVE FEES & COSTS

$220,000 SBA 7A LOAN -DOT WAIVER OF ADMINISTRATIVE FEES & COSTS

Clients personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan that was referred to the Department of Treasury for collection.  Treasury claimed our clients owed over $220,000 once it added its statutory collection fees and interest.  We were able to negotiate a significant reduction of the total claimed amount from $220,000 to $119,000, saving the clients over $100,000 by arguing for a waiver of the statutory 28%-30% administrative fees and costs.

$1,200,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OHA LITIGATION

$1,200,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OHA LITIGATION

Client personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan to help with a relative’s new business venture.  After the business failed, Treasury was able to secure a recurring Treasury Offset Program (TOP) levy against his monthly Social Security Benefits based on the claim that he owed over $1.2 million dollars. We initially submitted a Cross-Servicing Dispute, but then, prepared and filed an Appeals Petition with the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals (SBA OHA).  As a result of our efforts, we were able to convince the SBA to not only terminate the claimed debt of $1.2 million dollars against our client (without him having to file bankruptcy) but also refund the past recurring amounts that were offset from his Social Security Benefits in connection with the TOP levy.

Read more Case Results

Related Content

Read more sba debt articles