If you Owe more than $30,000 contact us for a case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
contact us for a free case evaluation at (833) 428-0937
Call us (833) 428-0937

How Small‐Dollar Fraud Provides the SBA Powerful Leverage though the SBA OIG’s Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA) That Can Cost SBA Lenders, Borrowers, and Guarantors Up To $1 Million

How Small‐Dollar Fraud Provides the SBA Powerful Leverage though the SBA OIG’s Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA) Muscle That Can Cost SBA Lenders, Borrowers, and Guarantors Up To $1 Million

Book a Consultation Call

How Small‐Dollar Fraud Provides the SBA Powerful Leverage though the SBA OIG’s Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA) That Can Cost SBA Lenders, Borrowers, and Guarantors Up To $1 Million

Why the SBA Loan and Debt Playbook Changed

On December 23, 2024, Congress super-charged an obscure statute—the Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA)—when it passed the FY 2025 National Defense Authorization Act. The amendments raise the cap on administrative cases from $150,000 to $1 million and broaden what counts as a “false claim,” empowering every federal inspector general—including the SBA Office of Inspector General (OIG)—to pursue loan-related fraud or malfeasance even when the Department of Justice (DOJ) says “no thanks.”

More importantly, it should be noted that SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler published her "Day One Memo" confirming SBA plans to aggressively step up collection efforts and audit investigations for COVID loans disbursed due to the pandemic –which can lead to a number of AFCA actions in the near future.

As part of the Trump Administration’s policy to pursue SBA COVID Loan fraud specifically involving PPP and EIDL loans, legislation was introduced in Congress by Republicans to ensure that collections on loans made to small businesses borrowers and guarantors related to the COVID-19 pandemic will no longer be suspended.

Click the following link to learn more about the "Complete COVID Collections Act" that was introduced as a Senate bill and may become federal law in the future: COVID Collections Act

AFCA vs. the Civil False Claims Act: Same Bite, Faster Bark

Feature: Where the case is heard
AFCA (as amended): Administrative hearing before a United States Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) at the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals Court (OHA) or Board of Contract Appeals member
Civil FCA: Federal District Court

Feature: DOJ involvement
AFCA (as amended): DOJ must approve the filing but does not have to prosecute in Federal District Court
Civil FCA: DOJ (or a qui-tam relator) files the suit

Feature: Dollar threshold
AFCA (as amended): ≤ $1 million per case (indexed for inflation)
Civil FCA: No cap

Feature: Penalties
AFCA (as amended): Up to $5,000 per false claim/statement + double damages + investigation costs
Civil FCA: Up to ~$27,000 per claim + treble damages

Feature: Statute of limitations
AFCA (as amended): 6 years from violation or 3 years from discovery (max 10)
Civil FCA: 6–10 years depending on facts

Sources: 31 U.S.C. §§ 3801-3812; FY 2025 NDAA § 5203.

How an AFCA Case Starts Inside SBA

  1. Investigating Official – The SBA OIG assigns special agents to subpoena records and interview witnesses. (Small     Business Administration, eCFR)
  2. Reviewing Official – A senior SBA attorney reviews the OIG’s report to decide whether sufficient evidence supports a charge.
  3. DOJ  Screening – The package goes to DOJ. If DOJ declines to sue under the Civil FCA in Federal District Court, it can green-light SBA to proceed administratively before an ALJ at the SBA Office of Hearings & Appeals Court (OHA) or Board of Contract Appeals member.
  4. Administrative Complaint – SBA files before an ALJ; Respondent SBA participating lenders, SBA loan borrowers, obligors or guarantors receive 30 days to file an answer or other responsive pleading.

Hearing & Decision – After discovery and an evidentiary hearing,the presiding ALJ issues findings in a Decision and Order – which can involve the imposition of penalties or dismisses the case. Appeals go to the SBA Administrator and then to the Federal D.C. Circuit pursuant to rights and remedies under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).

Red-Flag Scenarios for SBA Lenders, Borrowers, and Guarantors

Player: 7(a) / CDC Lenders
Potential AFCA Violation:
Certifying that collateral was properly perfected or liquidated in a commercially reasonable manner when it was not
Real-World Example:
Filing an SBA Form 159 indicating all fees were disclosed  when “packaging” fees were hidden

Player: Borrowers
Potential AFCA Violation:
Overstating payroll in a PPP forgiveness application
Real-World Example:
Claiming EIDL funds were used for working capital while  diverting cash to personal real estate or other personal expenses

Player: Guarantors
Potential AFCA Violation: Concealing assets to avoid repayment (reverse false claim)
Real-World Example: Transferring property to a spouse after default but before Treasury offset; Lying about or omitting relevant financial information in financial statements (Form 770), Offer in Compromise(Form 1150) or other pertinent documents submitted under penalty of perjury

Player: Servicers / Purchasers
Potential AFCA Violation: Misreporting liquidation proceeds to maximize the SBA guarantee purchase
Real-World Example: Failing to remit auction proceeds and certifying “no recoveries available"

Because the amended AFCA now covers reverse false claims,hiding assets or under-reporting recoveries can trigger liability even when no new funds are sought. Source: (National Law Review)

Penalties: What’s at Stake

  1. Civil Penalty – Up to $5,000 per false statement or claim (adjusted for inflation).
  2. Damage Multiplier – Up to the amount SBA already paid or credited.
  3. Cost Reimbursement – SBA recoups the OIG’s investigation and litigation costs first.

For a single 7(a) guarantee purchase of $400,000 supported by four false certifications, exposure can exceed $900,000 before interest.

To-Do Action Plans

  1. Tighten  Documentation – Keep source data (payroll reports, bank statements, appraisals) for six years.
  2. Refresh Training – Update staff and borrower on boarding materials to cover AFCA risks.
  3. Audit     Certifications – Double-check Form 172, Form 159, servicing reports, and loan forgiveness packages.
  4. Self-Disclosure – If errors surface, consider a proactive disclosure to SBA OIG before an investigation begins.
  5. Maintain  Guarantor Transparency – Track asset transfers post-default; document valuations.

Takeaway

The AFCA’s $1 million ceiling and broader definitions mean SBA OIG no longer needs to wait for DOJ to chase many PPP, EIDL, Disaster, 7(a)or 504 fraud cases. Small-dollar no longer means small risk. A single inaccurate certification under penalty of perjury can invite an administrative lawsuit before the SBA OHA Court that freezes assets, garnishes Treasury payments, and tarnishes reputations.

If you are an SBA  borrower, or guarantor facing an inquiry—contact the attorneys at SBA-Attorneys.com for a confidential Case Evaluation.

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified SBA-Attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.

Why Hire Us to Help You with Your Treasury or SBA Debt Problems?

construction accident injury lawyer

Millions of Dollars in SBA Debts Resolved via Offer in Compromise and Negotiated Repayment Agreements without our Clients filing for Bankruptcy or Facing Home Foreclosure

slip and fall attorney

Millions of Dollars in Treasury Debts Defended Against via AWG Hearings, Treasury Offset Program Resolution, Cross-servicing Disputes, Private Collection Agency Representation, Compromise Offers and Negotiated Repayment Agreements

truck accident injury attorney

Our Attorneys are Authorized by the Agency Practice Act to Represent Federal Debtors Nationwide before the SBA, The SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Treasury Department, and the Bureau of Fiscal Service.

$298,000 SBA 7A LOAN - NEGOTIATED WORKOUT AGREEMENT

$298,000 SBA 7A LOAN - NEGOTIATED WORKOUT AGREEMENT

Clients obtained an SBA 7(a) loan for their small business in the amount of $298,000. They pledged their primary residence and personal guarantees as direct collateral for the loan. The business failed, the lender was paid the 7(a) guaranty money and the debt was assigned to the SBA.  Clients received the Official 60-Day Notice giving them a couple of options to resolve the debt balance directly with the SBA before referral to Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service. The risk of referral to Treasury would add nearly $95,000 to the SBA principal loan balance. With the default interest rate at 7.5%, the amount of money to pay toward interest was projected at $198,600. Clients hired the Firm with only 4 days left to respond to the 60-Day due process notice.  Because the clients were not eligible for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) due to the significant equity in their home and the SBA lien encumbering it, the Firm Attorneys proposed a Structured Workout to resolve the SBA debt.  After back and forth negotiations, the SBA Loan Specialist assigned to the case approved the Workout terms which prevented potential foreclosure of their home, but also saved the clients approximately $294,000 over the agreed-upon Workout term with a waiver of all contractual and statutory administrative fees, collection costs, penalties, and interest.

$150,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC CASH SETTLEMENT

$150,000 SBA 7A LOAN - SBA OIC CASH SETTLEMENT

Client personally guaranteed SBA 7(a) loan balance of over $150,000.  Business failed and eventually shut down.  SBA then pursued client for the balance.  We intervened and was able to present an SBA OIC that was accepted for $30,000.

$505,000 SBA 7A LOAN - FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT LITIGATION (CALIFORNIA)

$505,000 SBA 7A LOAN - FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT LITIGATION (CALIFORNIA)

Clients borrowed and personally guaranteed an SBA 7(a) loan.  Clients defaulted on the SBA loan and were sued in federal district court for breach of contract.  The SBA lender demanded the Client pledge several personal real estate properties as collateral to reinstate and secure the defaulted SBA loan.  We were subsequently hired to intervene and aggressively defend the lawsuit.  After several months of litigation, our attorneys negotiated a reinstatement of the SBA loan and a structured workout that did not involve any liens against the Client's personal real estate holdings.

Read more Case Results

Related Content

Read more sba debt articles